The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady by Alphonse Mucha: a red-clad envoy faces the standing king in a crowded chamber

The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady (1923), No. 13 in the Mucha Foundation’s individual Slav Epic catalogue.

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Page Created on / Page Updated on
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady by Alphonse Mucha: A Broken Audience

A bright window floods a crowded chamber. At one side, a red-clad visitor faces the court; at the other, a king has risen so suddenly that his chair falls behind him. Officials and attendants watch across a table, while a child and books occupy the foreground. Alphonse Mucha's The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady turns an argument over religious authority into a room full of reactions. The Mucha Foundation identifies it as No. 13 in the Slav Epic, painted in 1923, and sets the encounter in 1462.[1]

The dispute concerns the Basel Compacts, an agreement connected to the position of the Utraquist Church in Bohemia. Pope Pius II refused to continue recognising it, and his demand was brought to King Jiří's court.[1][2] Mucha does not show a battle. He shows a political break taking shape through posture, distance and a small book closing at the edge of the scene.

At a Glance

  • ArtistAlphonse Mucha
  • CycleThe Slav Epic, No. 13 of 20[1]
  • Foundation titleThe Hussite King Jiří of Podĕbrady. Treaties Are To be Respected (1462)[1]
  • Painting date1923[1][3]
  • Mediumegg tempera on canvas[1]
  • Dimensions405 × 480 cm, for the finished canvas[1]
  • Depicted subjectKing Jiří's 1462 confrontation with a papal representative over the Basel Compacts[1][2]

The thirteenth Epic canvas in Mucha’s career

Contents

  1. Why the agreement mattered
  2. A king rises from his chair
  3. What Pius II remembered of the assemblies
  4. The red visitor and the watching court
  5. The book marked Roma
  6. A dispute that travelled beyond Prague
  7. Painted in 1923
  8. Looking again

Why the agreement mattered

King Jiří of Poděbrady ruled Bohemia from 1458 to 1471. The Foundation explains that the Basel Compacts had recognised beliefs and practices of the Utraquist Church after the earlier Hussite conflicts.[1] When Jiří sought papal confirmation of Bohemia's religious position, Pius II refused to recognise the agreement and pressed the king to bring the kingdom under Rome's direction.[1][2]

The journey to Rome makes the court scene more specific. The Old Czech Annals name five members of the delegation sent in January 1462: Zdeněk Kostka, Jan Malovec, the royal chancellor Prokop of Rabštejn, Václav Vrbenský and Václav Koranda. They were to seek confirmation both of the Compacts and of the elected archbishop Jan Rokycana.[10] A Czech introduction to Pius II's own memoir identifies Rabštejn as Catholic and the other principal spokesmen as Utraquists.[9] The king was therefore trying to negotiate through a delegation that crossed the very confessional division at issue. Its failure affected more than a single court faction.

Pius's memoir supplies the Roman side of the encounter, although its language is openly hostile to the Bohemian request. It records the ambassadors asking Rome to confirm their agreement with the Council of Basel and presents the pope's refusal as a defence of church authority.[9] Read alongside the Bohemian annals, this is evidence of two incompatible interpretations of the same diplomatic mission, rather than a neutral record of what all parties believed. Pius also says the envoys asked for Fantino to accompany them back to Bohemia; the Czech editor questions that explanation. The reason for his appointment remains less certain than the fact that he carried the papal answer.[9]

The timing needs care. Prague City Gallery says the envoys returned to Prague with Fantinus de Valle on 3 April 1462, then describes the audience at the king's court in the Old Town.[2] Italian historian Paolo Cherubini, using a dated payment in Rome's state archives, says Fantino was paid for the journey on 2 April, reached Prague only in mid-May, and was received by the king on 13 August.[5] The Gallery's April return cannot describe Fantino's arrival if that archival chronology is right. The painting reconstructs the confrontation, not a dated document; this article follows Cherubini's more specific evidence for the envoy's journey and audience.

The Old Czech Annals put the Bohemian delegation's return after 18 April and say a diet was convened in Prague for 10 August. They place the announcement of Pius's refusal and Fantino's speech before that assembly.[10] Those dates help bridge the Roman mission and the August confrontation, but the day the diet was called is not necessarily the day Fantino spoke. Cherubini's 13 August audience date remains the more precise date for his reception by the king.[5] The different records also show why an April return for the royal ambassadors should not be confused with an April arrival by the papal envoy.

The papal decision had already been made before Fantino's meeting. A Czech scholarly account explains that Jiří's delegation sought confirmation of the Compacts in Rome; after negotiations, Pius II declared them invalid and treated the settlement as a concession made to one earlier generation.[6] That helps explain why the scene is charged. The visitors were bringing a decision about the kingdom's religious order into a court whose ruler did not accept that the agreement could simply be set aside.

The Foundation's subtitle, “Treaties Are To be Respected,” tells readers how Mucha frames the disagreement.[1] It places weight on a prior settlement and on Jiří's refusal to abandon it. A treaty can be a legal text, a political promise and a symbol of collective memory at once. Mucha makes that abstract problem visible as one group confronts another before a watching court.

A king rises from his chair

Jiří stands at the right, set higher than many of the people before him. The Foundation and Gallery both read the tipped chair as the result of his sudden, forceful response.[1][2] His outstretched body gives movement to an otherwise formal audience. A viewer can trace the exchange from the red visitor, across the table, toward the king's raised position.

The Gallery recounts a fierce verbal reply from Jiří.[2] The Old Czech Annals also attribute an extended answer to him: he would not exchange his faith for a more advantageous kingdom, and he spoke for his wife and children as well as himself.[10] This is a partisan chronicle's report of a speech, not a stenographic transcript. We cannot hear it in the painting. Mucha conveys the reply through action: the fallen chair, the king's posture and the faces turned toward him. The room seems to have been interrupted in the middle of court procedure.

In the annals, the king calls in representatives from Bohemia and Moravia, the Six Cities, two bishops, nobles and towns. The queen stands at his right and his sons at his left.[10] That written arrangement conveys how broadly the reply was meant to be witnessed, even though it cannot be used on its own to identify every figure Mucha painted. The canvas similarly widens a dispute between envoy and monarch into a public test of allegiance. Its many observers matter because a papal refusal had consequences throughout the kingdom, not only for the person who delivered it.

In After the Battle of Vítkov Hill, a commander stands apart after fighting. Here, a ruler takes a public stand inside a political assembly. Both paintings concern the long consequences of the Hussite movement, with this canvas shifting the conflict from arms to authority over a religious settlement.[1][2]

What Pius II remembered of the assemblies

The pope's Commentarii gives a second, sharply partisan narrative of the Prague meetings. In its account, Jiří first gathered Utraquist and Catholic representatives to hear the returning Bohemian envoys report on their Roman mission. He then defended the Compacts before asking each religious group whether it would support him if the kingdom faced war over them.[11] This is the king's declaration as retold by his opponent, not a recording of his exact words. The passage is nevertheless useful because it makes visible a political question behind Mucha's raised chair: could the ruler call on both confessions to defend a settlement that only one embraced?

Pius describes a confident Utraquist answer through Zdeněk Kostka, one of the envoys, but gives the Catholics a more qualified reply through Zdeněk of Šternberk. They would retain their attachment to Rome and had not agreed to the Compacts, although they would not willingly abandon king and kingdom where conscience and justice allowed support.[11] That distinction complicates the Gallery's impression of a single proud court. A crowd could witness Jiří's stand without sharing his reading of the agreement. Mucha's dramatic focus makes the king's position legible while leaving the different responses of Catholic and Utraquist nobles harder to see.

In Pius's sequence, Fantino addressed a subsequent assembly, after the king had heard the Bohemian envoys. The papal account says Fantino asked to speak and return safely as an envoy; it then has him defend papal authority, challenge Jiří's interpretation of his coronation oath and argue that the Compacts' concession had been forfeited.[11] Its rhetoric also portrays Fantino as courageous and the king as threatening. Those judgments served Pius's case. Set beside the Old Czech Annals, which preserve a pro-Utraquist royal reply, the memoir shows competing efforts to make the confrontation morally decisive. Neither text confirms that Mucha drew a specific gesture from its wording.

The accounts disagree even about the calendar. The Danish edition of Pius's book heads the first assembly 9 August and describes Fantino's appearance next; Cherubini places his reception by the king on 13 August, while Boublík dates the Diet's opening to 12 August.[5][6][11] They may describe different stages of proceedings, but the sources here do not establish one continuous, precisely timed meeting. Mucha's single room can therefore be read as a condensation of report, declaration and confrontation. The boy closing Roma gives that sequence a visual full stop that the historical record does not supply.

The red visitor and the watching court

The Foundation calls the red-clad figure Cardinal Fantin; the Gallery describes Fantinus de Valle as a returning Bohemian emissary and papal representative.[1][2] Cherubini identifies him as a canon of Zara in an April 1462 payment record and says he became a bishop only in 1463.[5] The “cardinal” title is therefore unsupported by this biographical evidence. Here he is a papal envoy. He had previously served as Jiří's own representative in Rome, which made the confrontation more personal than a meeting with a stranger.[5]

Cherubini's account says the king rebuked Fantino for failing in his former duty as royal procurator and then had him imprisoned for roughly three months.[5] The Old Czech Annals say he was arrested a day or two after the speech and held at Poděbrady for several weeks.[10] Prague City Gallery likewise reports imprisonment after the audience.[2] The sources agree on the arrest but differ over its duration; the article cannot turn “weeks” and “three months” into one certain term. Nor can the outcome be read from the red garment alone. It does, however, show that the figure across from Jiří stood at the centre of a relationship that had crossed from royal service into papal service.

The annals also say the king arrested his chancellor Rabštejn, suspecting that he had departed from his instructions during the Rome mission, then restored him to office. They describe Fantino's release and escort towards Regensburg after intercession by Duke Ludwig of Bavaria and other princes.[10] Cherubini likewise links Fantino's release to pressure from European rulers.[5] This aftermath complicates the apparent simplicity of Mucha's scene. Even within the king's own delegation, a Catholic chancellor could become suspect; beyond Bohemia, other rulers pressed for the papal envoy's freedom. The argument in the chamber did not remain within its walls.

The Gallery identifies several figures in the crowd, including Jan Rokycana, a lord of Rožmberk and the king's adviser Jan Paleček.[2] It reads their expressions as a mixture of shock and pride. Those named figures make the room a political assembly as well as a royal audience. Jan Boublík's Czech study describes the Old Town Diet convened in August 1462 as including both Utraquists and Catholics, Queen Johana and Jiří's sons.[6] It reports Utraquist support for the king but a Catholic noble's reluctance to break with the papal court. Mucha's court is visually united by a single dramatic exchange; the historical assembly contained divisions that the painting's decisive gesture cannot settle.

Mucha's large luminous window does more than decorate the room. It makes the assembly look exposed, almost staged before public judgment. The officials are not hidden in a private negotiation; they form a visible audience for a break in authority. The grandeur of the architecture contrasts with the disorder of the overturned chair.

The book marked Roma

Near the lower right, the Gallery identifies a boy closing a book whose cover reads “Roma.” It interprets the gesture as Mucha's sign that negotiations with Rome have ended.[2] The Foundation also notes the closing book and its symbolic meaning.[1] The word is too small to read securely in the inherited reproduction, so that identification rests on the institutional accounts.

This small action balances the king's large one. A toppled chair makes rupture immediate and physical; a closed book makes it procedural and final. Yet the painting does not prove that every relationship between Bohemia and Rome ended at this instant. It dramatizes a particular failure of agreement and Mucha's chosen meaning for it.

The title's appeal to respecting treaties is also an argument. It tells us where Mucha places moral weight, not that every participant in the historical dispute would have understood the Compacts in the same way. The canvas is most revealing when seen as an interpretation of a contested decision rather than an impartial courtroom diagram.[1][2]

A dispute that travelled beyond Prague

The rupture was not confined to a debate between court and curia. Jiří Jurok's study of the king's diplomatic missions identifies 31 March 1462 as the date when Pius cancelled the Compacts. It also places Jiří's meeting with King Casimir IV of Poland at Głogów in May, before the August Prague audience. Their 27 May agreement pledged friendship and mutual help, especially against Ottoman attack, while excepting the pope.[7] These dates show that the king was already managing alliances across borders as the religious dispute sharpened. They do not make the Głogów agreement an illustration hidden inside Mucha's chamber.

Jurok also traces the later peace-league proposal associated with Jiří and his adviser Antonio Marini. The plan developed through several missions rather than springing from a single indignant royal reply.[7] Mucha's canvas captures the force of a refusal; diplomacy required a longer series of messages, councils and negotiations. The contrast helps explain why the artist chose an indoor confrontation for this part of the Slav Epic: one broken audience can stand for a political turn, even though the practical response was dispersed across many courts.

An archival description in Thuringia records a later 1463–67 document in which Jiří explained to Duke Wilhelm of Saxony his reasons for Fantino's arrest and addressed the papal proceedings against him.[12] The record establishes that the king's own defence of the arrest circulated beyond Bohemia; the catalogue description does not disclose its full argument, so it cannot settle whether the imprisonment was justified. It also shows the limits of the painting's closing-book symbol. However final the gesture appears, both sides continued to argue their case in writing after the audience.

Painted in 1923

Mucha completed the canvas in 1923. The Foundation's timeline groups it with two other Slav Epic paintings presented to Prague that year.[3] Its more than four-metre height makes the confrontation monumental, even though the subject is an indoor exchange over the terms of an agreement.[1]

Jiří's reign extended well beyond this episode. After 1462, he pursued diplomatic alliances and a proposed league of Christian rulers. Jurok's study places negotiations in France in 1464, and a later Council of Europe speech recalls his peace proposal.[7][8] These later efforts help explain why the king remains prominent in European historical memory. They belong after the confrontation shown here; Mucha's canvas focuses on an audience over the Compacts, not the drafting of a peace league.

The historical dispute was also less cleanly divided than Mucha's staging. Boublík's account notes that Jiří's coronation oath was read differently by Rome and by the king: the pope counted Utraquists among the people to be suppressed, while Jiří did not.[6] The title's “treaties” therefore names a genuine conflict over obligations and interpretation. The king's refusal had support, but it also placed Catholic allies under growing pressure. Mucha gives the audience a moment of moral clarity; the history that followed remained politically unsettled.

Looking again

Follow the gaze from the red envoy toward the king, then down to the boy and the closed book. The painting moves from a demand, to a public response, to a compact sign of broken negotiation. The surrounding officials make the room feel full of witnesses to a decision that will travel beyond it.[1][2]

The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady gives Mucha's Slav Epic a scene of resistance without weapons. Its dramatic chair and quiet book translate a dispute over authority into gestures anyone can see. The room is crowded, but the central choice is clear in Mucha's telling: whether a ruler will yield a religious settlement or insist that it be honoured.[1][2]

Watch: Alphonse Mucha

Place Mucha’s Czech and Slavic projects beside his better known Paris work.

Artworks directory

292 artworks

NameDateMedium
'Accept Love and Enthusiasm from Your Son, Mother of the Holy Nation': study for the mural 'By Own Strength III' at the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Pencil and charcoal on canvas
'By force towards freedom, with love towards unity!': study for the mural 'By Own Strength II' at the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Pencil and charcoal on canvas
'The Passing Wind Takes Youth Away': design for a fan and the façade of the 'Pavilion of Man' (unrealised)1899Colour lithograph
'Through humiliated and tortured, you will live again, my country!': study for the mural 'By Own Strength II' at the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Pencil and charcoal on canvas
1918-1928: Poster for the 10th Anniversary of the Independence of the Republic of Czechoslovakia1928Colour lithograph
6th Sokol Festival1912Colour lithograph
8th Sokol Festival1925Colour lithograph
After the Battle of Grunwald1924egg tempera on canvas
After the Battle of Vitkov Hill1923egg tempera on canvas
Age of Love1936–1938
Age of Reason1936–1938
Age of Wisdom1936–1938
Amants1895Colour lithograph
Apotheosis of the Slavs1926Egg tempera on canvas
As Hamlet1899colour lithograph
Au Quartier Latin1898Magazine cover
Banknotes of Czechoslovakia, designed by Mucha: 500 crown; 50 Crown; 10 Crown1929Banknotes
Bieres de la Meuse1897Colour lithograph
Biscuits Champagne Lefevre Utile1896Colour lithograph
Biscuits Lefevre Utile1896 design for 1897 calendar; Foundation object/Carnavalet 1897Colour lithograph
Blessed are the Pure in Heart1906Printed magazine illustration
Bleu Deschamps1903 (deposit)Colour lithograph
Bosnia & Herzegovina Pavilion - illustration featured in 'Le Figaro Illustré' (1 March 1900)1900Reproduction from Le Figaro Illustré after watercolour original
Bosnia-Herzegovina Pavilion: cartoon for the mural 'The Roman Period and the Arrival of the Slavs'1899-1900ink and crayon on paper
Bosnia-Herzegovina Pavilion: fragment of the upper frieze featuring Ivo and Anica, characters from Bosnian legends1899-1900tempera and watercolour on canvas
Bosnian Legends: Death of Hasanaga's Bride1899Charcoal on paper
Bosnian Legends: Murcia - The Plague Lady1899Charcoal on paper
Bosnian Pavilion Restaurant at the Paris Exhibition 1900: design for the menu1900Pencil and watercolour on paper
Boutique Fouquet (interior design)1901Shop interior design
Boutique Fouquet: sketches of the shop's signboard and decorative detailsc.1900Pencil, ink and watercolour on paper
Box for Lefèvre-Utile biscuits: Gaufrettes Vanillec.1900Tin box covered with lithographed label
Box for Lefèvre-Utile biscuits: Madèrec.1900Tin box covered with lithographed label
Brightness of the Day1899Colour lithograph
Broach with Pendant1900Gold, ivory, mother-of-pearl and semi-precious stones
Byzantine Head - The Blonde1897Colour lithograph
Byzantine Heads (pair)1897Colour lithograph
Byzantine Heads: Brunette1897Colour lithograph
Bénédictine1898 (BnF deposit); Hamburg 1899; MNAC 1896 or 1898Colour lithograph
Champagne Ruinart1896Colour lithograph
Chocolat Idealbefore or in 1897 (catalogue conflict)Colour lithograph
Chocolat Masson (1897 calendar)1896–1897Colour lithograph
Choirboys at Petrov Church, Brno1905Watercolour on cardboard
Cloches de Noel1900Illustrated book
Comedy: study for a mural for the German Theatre, New York1908Oil on canvas
Cours Mucha: poster advertising Mucha's art classes held at the Académie Colarossi, Paris1900colour lithograph
Creative Force - Jan z Pernštýna: study for a pendentive of the Lord Mayor’s Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Oil on canvas
Crucifixionc.1868Pencil, crayon and watercolour on paper
Cycles Perfecta1897 or 1902 (catalogue conflict)Colour lithograph
Dance1898Colour lithograph
Dead Couple - Abandonedc.1899-1900Charcoal and pastel on blue paper
Defense of Sziget against the Turks by Nicholas Zrinsky1914egg tempera on canvas
Design for a champagne posterc. 1896Charcoal and pastel on paper
Design for a display stand at the Paris Exhibition 1900c.1899-1900Pencil and wash on paper
Design for Champagne Ruinartc. 1896Pencil, watercolour and gold leaf on paper
Design for the cover of the magazine 'Fantaz'1882Ink and watercolour on paper
Design for the heading of the cover of the magazine 'Krokodil'1885Pen and ink on cardboard
Design for the poster for the Mucha Exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum, New York, January-February 19211920Pen and ink and watercolour on paper
Designs for cutleryc.1900Charcoal and white on card
Designs for tablewarec.1900Charcoal, coloured pencil and white on card
Diadem for 'La princesse lointaine'1895metal and pearls
Diploma of Ivančice: Mock diploma honouring a local celebrity, with illustration of the first line of 'May', a poem by Karel Hynek Mácha1882Pen and ink and watercolour on paper
Documents décoratifs: designs for a watch and accessories (unused)1901-1902Pencil, ink and white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 25, featuring studies of lily1901-1902Pencil on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 431901-1902Pencil, ink and wash, heightened with white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 491901-1902Pencil and white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 501901-1902Pencil and white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 601901-1902Pencil, ink and wash, heightened with white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 631901-1902Pencil and white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 671901-1902Pencil and white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 711901-1902Pencil and white on paper
Documents décoratifs: final study for Plate 721901-1902Pencil and wash, heightened with white on paper
Documents décoratifs: line drawing for Plate 33, featuring lily motifs1901-1902Pencil, pen and ink on paper
Documents décoratifs: Plate 541902Lithograph
Dreaming of Freedom: study for a Panel of the Small Reception Room at the Lord Mayor’s Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Pen and ink and watercolour on paper
Dusk1899Colour lithograph
Evening1899Colour lithograph
F. Champenois (Rêverie imprint)1898Colour lithograph
F. Guillot-Pelletier calendar (1898)1897–1898Colour lithograph
Feather1899Colour lithograph
Figures décoratives: final study for Plate 21904-1905Pencil and white on paper
Figures décoratives: final study for Plate 31904-1905Pencil and white on paper
Figures décoratives: final study for Plate141904-1905Pencil with white on paper
Figures décoratives: sketch study for Plate141904-1905Blue pencil on paper
Flirt Lefevre Utile1899 (Foundation design); BnF legal deposit 1900Colour lithograph
Flower1897Colour lithograph
Flower: final study for decorative panel1897Pencil, ink and watercolour on paper
France Embraces Bohemia1918oil on canvas
Fruit1897Colour lithograph
Georges Fouquet (1858-1929), Paris, after design by Mucha: Ornamental Chain with pendants1900Gold, enamel, fresh-water pearls, mother of pearl and semi-precious stones
Georges Fouquet (1858-1929), Paris, after Mucha design: 'Peacock' Ring (Exhibited at the Paris Exhibition 1900)1900Opal and gold
Girl Weepingc.1899-1900Black chalk and pastel on paper
Girl with Loose Hair and Tulips1920Oil on canvas
Gismonda1894Colour lithograph
Head of a Girl, statue for the stand of the Houbigant Perfumery at the Paris Exhibition 19001900Bronze, silver and parcel gilt
Head of Sarah Bernhardt: Study for 'Lorenzaccio'1896Pencil on paper
Heather from Coastal Cliffs1902Colour lithograph
Heidsieck & Co1901Colour lithograph
Holy Mount Athos1926Egg tempera on canvas
Ilsée, Princesse de Tripoli1897Illustrated book
In the Desert: Study for an illustration for the Světozor magazine1889Pencil, watercolour and gouache on paper
Incantation (Salammbô)1897Lithograph
Independence - Jiří z Poděbrad: study for a pendentive of the Lord Mayor’s Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Oil on canvas
Interior and furniture designsc.1900Pencil on paper
Interior of Boutique Fouquet: design for a wall-mounted display cabinet with statuette and mirrorc.1900Pencil on paper
Interior of Boutique Fouquet: design for the fireplace with statuettes, mirror, and the ornamental details of the wallc.1900Pencil and watercolour on cardboard
Interior of Boutique Fouquet: sketches of the fireplace with statue, mirror, display cabinet, and the ornamental details of the wallc.1900Pencil, pen and ink on paper
Ivy1901Colour lithograph
Jan Milic of Kromeriz1916egg tempera on canvas
Jaroslava and Jiří, the Artist’s Children1918Oil on canvas
JOB poster1896Colour lithograph
Judgement of Paris (calendar for Vieillemard printing company)1895Colour lithograph
Justice - Master Jan Hus: study for a pendentive of the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní dům, Prague1910-1911Oil on canvas
L'Annee Qui Vient1897red chalk on paper
L'Illustration magazine - cover for Christmas 1896/18971896Magazine cover
L'Illustré Soleil du Dimanche1897Magazine cover
La Dame aux Camélias: designs for cover and interior of special programme1896Pencil and watercolour on paper
La Nature1899-1900Bronze and amethyst
La Plume1897Magazine cover
La Samaritaine1897colour lithograph
Lance Parfum Rodo1896; Albertina print c. 1900Colour lithograph
Laurel1901Colour lithograph
Le Monde Illustré1900Magazine cover
Le Pater1899Illustrated book
Le Pater: early study for the 1st allegorical scene 'Our Father who art in Heaven' (1899) (Mucha Foundation object 300)1899Pencil on paper
Le Pater: early study for the 1st allegorical scene 'Our Father who art in Heaven' (1899) (Mucha Foundation object 302)1899Pastel on paper
Le Pater: study for the 6th allegorical scene 'Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors'1899Charcoal and ink wash on paper
Lefevre Utile1904Advertisement
Leslie Carter1908Colour lithograph
Letem Českým Světem1898Printed book
Lorenzaccio1896Colour lithograph
Luchon poster (attributed to Mucha)1895Colour lithograph
Madonna of the Lilies1905Tempera on canvas
Master Jan Hus Preaching at the Bethlehem Chapel1916egg tempera on canvas
Maude Adams1908Lithograph, hand-coloured in watercolour and gouache
Maude Adams as Joan of Arc1909Oil on canvas
Medea1898Colour lithograph
Menu for the Bosnian Pavilion Restaurant at the Paris Exhibition 19001900Colour lithograph
Militancy - Jan Žižka: study for a pendentive of the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní dům, Prague1910-1911Oil on canvas
Military Camp in Winter, near a City on Firec.1899-1900Pastel on paper
Moet et Chandon1899Colour lithograph
Monaco Monte Carlo1897Colour lithograph
Moon1902
Moravian Teachers' Choir1911Colour lithograph
Morning Alphonse Mucha Painting / AlphonseMucha.org1899Colour lithograph
Morning Star1902Colour lithograph
Moët & Chandon White Star1899Colour lithograph
Mrs Mucha’s Necklace1906gold, enamel and semi-precious stones
Mural for the Bosnia-Herzegovina Pavilion: The Roman Period and the Arrival of the Slavs1900tempera and watercolour on canvas
Murals by Mucha in the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní Dům (Municipal House), Prague (1910-1911)
Music1898Colour lithograph
Nativityc. 1934oil on canvas
Nestle's Food for Infants1897Colour lithograph
Night1899Colour lithograph
Nude on a Rock1898-1899Bronze
Official Banquet of the Paris Exhibition 1900: design for the menu featuring a fashionable woman wearing a Mucha-style jewellery1900Pencil, gouache and wash on grey paper
Ornamental motifs designed for 'Combinaisons Ornementales se Multipliant à l'Infini à l'Aide du Miroir' (1901)c.1900-1901Blue and red pencil on paper
Packaging for 'Savon Mucha Violette'1906Colour lithograph
Packaging for Lefèvre-Utile biscuits: Boudoir1901Colour lithograph
Page's Costume: study for an illustration for 'Le Costume au Théâtre'1890Pencil and watercolour on cardboard
Painting1898Colour lithograph
Peonies1897–1898Ink and watercolour
Petr Chelcicky at Vodnany1918egg tempera on canvas
Poetry1898Colour lithograph
Portrait of Jaroslavac.1927-1935Oil on canvas
Portrait of Josephine Crane Bradley as Slavia1908Oil and tempera on canvas
Portrait of Marie Chytilová (Maruška), Mucha's Future Wife1903pastel on paper
Portrait of Mucha's Sister, Angelac.1880Oil on canvas
Portrait of Mucha's Sister, Annac.1885Oil on canvas
Portrait of Mucha's Son, Jiří1925Oil on canvas
Portrait of Mucha's Wife, Maruška1908/17Oil on canvas
Portrait of Womanc. mid 1910s - 1925Blue pastel on grey paper
Poster for 'Hommage Respectueux de Nestlé' (the Nestlé Company's tribute to Queen Victoria's 60th Jubilee)1897Colour lithograph
Poster for 'Imprimerie Cassan Fils'1896Colour lithograph
JOB poster (1898)1898Colour lithograph
Poster for 'La Dame aux Camélias'1896Colour lithograph
Poster for 'La Tosca'1899Colour lithograph
Poster for 'Regional Exhibition at Ivančice 1913'1912Colour lithograph
Poster for 'The Slav Epic Exhibition, Brno, 1930'1928-1930Colour lithograph
Poster for 'Waverley Cycles'1898Colour lithograph
Poster for the 'Lottery of the Union of Southwestern Moravia'1912Colour lithograph
Poster for the Austrian Pavilion at the Paris Exhibition 19001900Colour lithograph
Prague Subjugated: study for a Panel of the Small Reception Room at the Lord Mayor’s Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Pen and ink and watercolour on paper
Primrose1899Colour lithograph
Primrose and Feather (paired image)1899Colour lithographs (paired image)
Princess Hyacinth (Princezna Hyacinta)1911Colour lithograph
Print proof for the Biscuits Lefèvre-Utile tin1899Lithograph
Reverie1898Colour lithograph
Russia Restituenda [Russia Must Recover]1922Colour lithograph
Salome1897Colour lithograph
Salon des Cent1896Colour lithograph
Salon of the Hundred1897Colour lithograph
Sarah Bernhardt - La Princesse Lointaine - Lefevre Utile1903Colour lithograph
Sarah Bernhardt as La Princesse Lointaine: poster for 'La Plume' magazine1897Colour lithograph
Sarah Bernhardt in the role of the Duc de Reichstadt in L’Aiglon1900Pencil on paper
Sarah Bernhardt: study of her full-standing figurec.1896Pen and ink on paper
Savonnerie de Bagnolet calendar1898 (calendar)Printed advertising calendar
Self-portrait (1899)1899Oil on board
Self-portrait (1907)1907Blue and white crayon on blue Ingres paper
Self-portrait, sketching in his apartment, Parislate 1880soil on canvas
Sketches of flowers for Documents décoratifsc.1900-1901Pen and ink on paper
Slavia insurance poster1907Poster
Slavs in their Original Homeland1912Egg tempera on canvas
Snake Bracelet with a Ring1899Gold, enamel, opal, ruby and diamond
Société Populaire des Beaux Arts1897Colour lithograph
Song of Bohemia1918oil on canvas
St. Vitus Cathedral Stained-glass Window, Prague: final design for the central panels, featuring SS Cyril and Methodius1931Ink and watercolour on paper
St. Vitus Cathedral Stained-glass Window, Prague: final design for the central panels, featuring St. Ludmila1931Ink and watercolour on paper
St. Vitus Cathedral Stained-glass Window, Prague: final design for the central panels, featuring St. Wenceslas (Duke of Bohemia) kneeling next to his Grandmother, St. Ludmila1931Ink and watercolour on paper
St.Vitus Cathedral Stained-glass Window, Prague: final design for the bottom left panels1931Ink and watercolour on paper
St.Vitus Cathedral Stained-glass Window, Prague: final design for the bottom right panels1931Ink and watercolour on paper
Stained-glass Window designed by Mucha at St. Vitus Cathedral, PragueEarly 1930sN/A
Study for 'The Age of Reason'1936-1938Pencil and watercolour on paper
Study for 'The Slav Epic cycle' No.19: The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia1913-1914Watercolour and gouache on paper
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.14: The Sacrifice at Szigetvár by Nikola Zrinskic.1913-1914Photographed drawings stuck together, tinted with watercolour and gouache
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.17: The Holy Mount Athos (1926)c.1925-26Charcoal heightened with white on cardboard
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.18: The Oath of Omladina under the Slavic Linden Treec.1925-1926Pencil and watercolour on paper
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.1: The Slavs in Their Original Homeland (1912)c.1910-1912Oil on canvas
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.2: The Celebration of Svantovítc.1910-1912Oil on canvas
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.7: Jan Milíč of Kroměřížc.1915-1916Oil on canvas
Study for 'The Slav Epic' cycle No.9: Master Jan Hus Preaching at the Bethlehem Chapel. The Magic of the Word: Truth Prevails (1412).c.1915-1916Oil on canvas
Study for 'The Three Ages' triptych: Reason, Wisdom and Love [unfinished project]1936-1938Pencil and watercolour on paper
Study for 'Woman in the Wilderness' (c. 1922-1923) (Mucha Foundation object 315)c. 1922-1923oil on canvas
Study for 'Woman in the Wilderness' (c. 1922-1923) (Mucha Foundation object 316)c. 1922-1923oil on canvas
Study for Savon Notre Damec. 1896pencil and watercolour on paper
Study for the poster 'Russia Restituenda [Russia Must Recover]'1922Pen and ink and watercolour on paper
Study of a Male Nude1885-1887Oil on canvas
The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia1914Egg tempera on canvas
The Arts (series)1898Colour lithograph
The Arts: study for 'Dance'1898Pencil and watercolour on paper
The Arts: study for 'Music'1898Pencil and watercolour on paper
The Arts: study for 'Painting'1898Pencil and watercolour on paper
The Arts: study for 'Poetry'1898Pencil and watercolour on paper
The Bohemian King Premysl Otakar II1924egg tempera on canvas
The Bulgarian Tsar Simeon1923egg tempera on canvas
The Burr McIntosh Monthly, 19071907Magazine cover
The Celebration of Svantovit1912egg tempera on canvas
The Coronation of the Serbian Tsar Stefan Dusan as East Roman Emperor1923egg tempera on canvas
The Devil and Mr Twardowsky: study for an illustration for 'The Tale of Pan Twardowsky' (a variation of 'Faust')c.1887-1888Charcoal on paper
The Flowers (series)1898Colour lithographs
The Flowers: Carnation1898Colour lithograph
The Flowers: Iris1898Colour lithograph
The Flowers: Lily1898Colour lithograph
The Flowers: Rose1898Colour lithograph
The Hussite King Jiri of Podebrady1923Egg tempera on canvas
The Introduction of the Slavonic Liturgy1912egg tempera on canvas
The Last Days of Jan Amos Komensky (Comenius) in Naarden1918Egg tempera on canvas
The Light of Hope1933Oil on canvas
The Meeting at Krizky1916egg tempera on canvas
The Months (January-June)1899Colour lithograph
The Months (July-December)1899Colour lithograph
The Moon and the Stars (four-panel montage)1902Colour lithographs (four-panel montage)
The Moon and the Stars (series)1902Colour lithograph
The Moon and the Stars: study for 'The Evening Star'1902Ink and watercolour on paper
The Moon and the Stars: study for 'The Pole Star'1902Ink and watercolour on paper
The New York Daily News art supplement1904Printed art supplement
The Oath of Concord of the Slavs (unfinished)1939oil on canvas
The Oath of Omladina under the Slavic Linden Tree1926, unfinishedEgg tempera on canvas
The Precious Stones (four-panel montage)1900Colour lithographs (four-panel montage)
The Precious Stones (series)1900Colour lithograph
The Precious Stones: Amethyst1900Colour lithograph
The Precious Stones: Emerald1900Colour lithograph
The Precious Stones: Ruby1900Colour lithograph
The Printing of the Bible of Kralice in Ivancice1914egg tempera on canvas
The Seasons (series)1896Colour lithograph
The Seasons (series) (1900)1900Colour lithograph
The Seasons (variation in screen format)1896Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Autumn (1896)1896Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Autumn (1900)1900Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Spring1900Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Spring (1896)1896Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Summer1900Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Summer (1896)1896Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Winter1900Colour lithograph
The Seasons: Winter (1896)1896Colour lithograph
The Slavonic Concord: study for the ceiling painting for the Lord Mayor's Hall, Obecní Dům, Prague1910-1911Oil on canvas
The Threat1912Colour lithograph
The Times of the Day (series)1899Colour lithograph
The West End Review1897 (Foundation); 1898 promotional coverColour lithograph
Thistle from the Sands1902Colour lithograph
Théâtre de la Renaissance: design for poster advertising Sarah Bernhardt's theatrec.1895Pen and ink on paper
Tin for Lefèvre-Utile biscuits1899Circular tin with lid and handle; colour print on metal
Topaz1900Colour lithograph
Tragedy - study for a mural for the German theatre New York1908Oil and tempera on canvas
Trappistine Liquors1897colour lithograph
Wiener Chic1905Magazine cover
Woman in the Wilderness1923Oil on canvas
Woman masked in white head-scarf - study for the illustration of the Bosnia & Herzegovina Pavilion featured in 'Le Figaro Illustré' (1 March 1900)1899Pencil and wash heightened with white on paper
Woman with a Daisy - textile designed by Mucha1900Printed upholstery fabric
Zdenka Cerny1913Colour lithograph
Zodiac (La Plume calendar)1896–97Colour lithograph
Zodiac (textless decorative panel)1896Colour lithograph
‘At the sight of the two storks the owl rose.’ Study for an illustration for Contes de Grand-mères1891Watercolour and gouache on paper

Frequently Asked Questions

When did Mucha paint The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady?
The Mucha Foundation dates the finished canvas to 1923. It depicts a confrontation set in 1462.
What are the Basel Compacts?
They were an agreement connected to the position of the Utraquist Church in Bohemia. The painting shows a dispute over their recognition.
Why is a boy closing a book?
The Mucha Foundation and Prague City Gallery read the book marked Roma as a sign of broken negotiations with Rome.

Discussion

Mucha arranges a papal envoy and King Jiří across a crowded court chamber.

The overturned chair and closed book make a political break visible.

Reader Insights

Close Looking

Where does the bright window direct your attention?

Context

How does the king’s fallen chair change the mood of the room?

Open Question

What role do the watching figures play in the scene?

Join the Conversation

Share what you notice about the envoy, the king and the book in the foreground.

References

  1. Mucha Foundation, “The Slav Epic cycle No. 13: The Hussite King Jiří of Podĕbrady,” object 224, finished-canvas identity, date, medium, dimensions and interpretation. View source.
  2. Prague City Gallery, “The Hussite King Jiří of Poděbrady,” illustrated story presented through Google Arts & Culture, based on the 2022 Moravský Krumlov exhibition catalogue. View source.
  3. Mucha Foundation, timeline, 1923 entry recording the canvas among three Slav Epic works presented to Prague. View source.
  4. Radio Prague International, “George of Podebrady,” interview with historian Miloslav Polívka on the king's reign and wider papal conflict. View source.
  5. Paolo Cherubini, “Della Valle, Fantino,” Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, vol. 37 (1989), documenting the 2 April travel payment, mid-May arrival, 13 August audience, prior royal service, rank and imprisonment. View source.
  6. Jan Boublík, “Měnové poměry doby poděbradské,” Sborník Národního muzea v Praze, series A, 60, nos. 1–2 (2006), historical introduction on the Compacts, coronation oath and August 1462 Diet, pp. 22–23. Read the National Museum PDF.
  7. Jiří Jurok, “Mírová a propagační poselstva krále Jiřího z Poděbrad v letech 1461–1467,” Historica Olomucensia 53 (2017), 47–86; Czech-language study of the 1462 papal decision, Głogów agreement and subsequent diplomacy. Read the university journal PDF.
  8. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, 1990 address recalling Jiří's proposal to Louis XI for a peace league. View source.
  9. Pius II, Commentarii, book VII, chapter 15, Czech translation by Monika Navrátilová with introduction by Jiří Špička, published by iLiteratura; papal account of the 1462 Bohemian embassy and editorial discussion of its perspective. Read the translation and introduction.
  10. Ze Starých letopisů českých, edited by Jaroslav Porák and Jaroslav Kašpar (Prague, 1980), p. 188, digitised by AHISTO; Bohemian chronicle account of the embassy, August diet, royal reply and arrests. Read the edited chronicle.
  11. Pius II, Commentarii, book X, chapters 1–3, Danish translation hosted by Wikisource; papal account of the separate Prague assemblies, confessional replies, Fantino's speech and arrest. Its sequence and judgments are partisan, and its dating conflicts with other records. Read the translated primary text.
  12. Thuringian State Archives, Ernestine General Archive, Reg. B, file 1515, catalogue record for Jiří's 1463–67 explanation to Duke Wilhelm of Saxony concerning Fantino's arrest and the papal proceedings; description only, not a full text. View archive record.