Madonna and Child with Two Angels, Attributed to Botticelli
The infant Jesus stretches towards Mary's face while she steadies him with both hands. One angel supports him from below; another peers out from behind the group. Their bodies nearly fill an oval painting, yet a distant landscape opens above their heads. The closeness of the figures and the space behind them make this Madonna and Child with Two Angels feel at once like an intimate encounter and a scene set in a wider world.[1]
The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York currently catalogues the work as attributed to Sandro Botticelli. That qualification matters. The painting resembles a famous Madonna by Botticelli's teacher, Filippo Lippi, and specialists have disagreed about who painted this particular version. It is tempera on wood, measures 99.7 by 71.1 centimetres in its present oval shape, and entered the Met with the H. O. Havemeyer Collection in 1929. The museum gives no date in its current online record and says it is not on view.[1]
At a glance
- Current attributionAttributed to Sandro Botticelli, Metropolitan Museum of Art
- TitleMadonna and Child with Two Angels
- Datenot specified in the Met's current object record
- Mediumtempera on wood
- Shape and sizeoval, 99.7 × 71.1 cm
- CollectionMetropolitan Museum of Art, New York, H. O. Havemeyer Collection
- Accession number29.100.17
- Displaynot currently on view
The Met panel and related works: chronology is uncertain
Filippo Lippi’s Uffizi Madonna
c. 1460–65Fortitude
1470Met Madonna and Child with Two Angels
Date not assigned by the MetThe Last Communion of Saint Jerome
early 1490sContents
- Four Figures in a Narrow Oval
- A Familiar Composition, Rearranged
- Why Is the Attribution Qualified?
- From Tuscany to the Havemeyer Collection
- Which *Madonna and Child with Two Angels*?
Four Figures in a Narrow Oval
Mary occupies the left half of the panel. Her head bends towards the child, drawing attention to the space where their faces almost meet. Her blue mantle surrounds a red dress, and the gold-edged fabric curves along the lower left of the picture. The child reaches towards her neck and shoulder. She holds him firmly across his body, so his movement feels energetic without unsettling the composition.[1]
The angels have different roles. The one at lower right is close to the child's body and helps support him. The other appears behind the child near the right edge. Its face turns outward, interrupting the inward movement between mother and son. The foreground angel's mauve clothing and the second angel's pale face keep that side of the image from disappearing behind Mary's larger, darker form. The picture is a carefully packed group rather than a simple pair of mother and child.[1]
The oval's curve matters to how we see them now. The rounded top encloses Mary's bowed head and the sky; the sides press close to her mantle and the outward-looking angel. At the bottom, a decorated fabric or cushion projects into the foreground. It brings a patch of light and pattern near the viewer and gives the figures a place to rest. The present shape makes the group feel enclosed, but it does not prove that an oval was the painter's first intention. An older Met catalogue described the panel as apparently a fragment of a larger composition.[1][2]
Above the figures lies a quiet stretch of country. Pale sky, winding paths, green land and steep rocks create depth behind the close-up group. The landscape has a different tempo from the touching hands in the foreground. It gives the eye somewhere to travel before returning to Mary and the child. The bright opening also separates their heads from the darker clothing below. No document identifies this view as a real place or explains it as a portrait of a particular region.[1]
A Familiar Composition, Rearranged
The painting belongs to a family of images related to Filippo Lippi's celebrated Madonna and Child with Two Angels in the Uffizi, Florence. The Uffizi dates Lippi's panel to about 1460–1465 and describes how two angels present the child to Mary. In that picture, she brings her hands together in prayer and a smiling foreground angel looks out at the viewer. The scene opens to a broad landscape through a window. The Uffizi notes that the composition became a model for other artists, including the young Botticelli.[3]
The Met's oval takes up the close grouping of mother, child and angels but does not simply repeat every gesture. Here Mary's hands hold the child rather than meeting in prayer. The supporting angel is low and close to him, while another face appears farther back. The child's reach towards his mother draws the two main figures together. The shared arrangement makes the relationship to Lippi's model clear, while the differences give this version its own balance and emotional pace.[1][2][3]
That relationship does not by itself settle the artist's name. Apprentices, followers and later painters could work from a successful image. A resemblance may show where an artist learned or what painting a patron admired; it cannot establish whose brush made each surviving passage. It is especially difficult to judge a work whose painted surface has changed through cleaning and wear. The Met's current wording preserves an attribution to Botticelli while acknowledging uncertainty.[1][2]
Why Is the Attribution Qualified?
The Met's 1971 catalogue, written by Federico Zeri with Elizabeth Gardner, presented this panel under “Follower of Fra Filippo Lippi.” Zeri saw it as one of several closely related versions of Lippi's Uffizi Madonna. He judged the panel difficult to attribute firmly because old overcleaning had badly affected the painting. He thought the better-preserved landscape and the angel at the far right were of higher quality than the rest, but did not consider the overall handling characteristic of Botticelli. He also compared the right-hand angel with work by Francesco Botticini.[2]
That is an important historical assessment, not the Met's current label. The museum now writes “Attributed to Botticelli,” and its object page does not offer a detailed public argument for that attribution. The two records can be read together without pretending they say the same thing: the older catalogue gives reasons for doubt, while the present museum record states the working identification. Earlier writers had also moved between names, including Filippo Lippi and Botticelli, when discussing the panel.[1][2]
Looking at the painting with that history in mind need not turn every detail into a test of authorship. The line of Mary's bowed face, the child's extended arm and the glimpse of the second angel remain central to the image whatever name is placed before them. At the same time, “attributed to” is more precise than simply calling it a Botticelli. It tells readers that the painting has a place in his artistic circle and in the debate about his early work, while its authorship is not presented as settled.[1][2]
The Met does not date the object on its current page. The close relationship to Lippi's work offers a historical context, and the Fondazione Zeri catalogue has recorded a proposed range of 1465–1475 for this panel under a different attribution. That proposal should not be silently turned into an exact date or into the Met's current view. The safe starting point is the museum's title, materials, size and qualified artist line.[1][2][4]
From Tuscany to the Havemeyer Collection
The 1971 Met catalogue records the painting in the parish church of San Tommaso at Castelfranco di Sopra, near Florence, and says it was removed in the late eighteenth century. It later belonged to the Counts Baglioni at their villa in Cerreto, where it remained until about 1903. Mr and Mrs H. O. Havemeyer then owned it in New York; the painting came to the Met through Mrs Havemeyer's 1929 bequest.[2]
This is a more specific history than the painting's current brief object page provides, but it begins centuries after Lippi and Botticelli worked. A record in a Tuscan church does not prove that the church originally commissioned it. Nor does the oval shape prove it was designed to fit a known architectural opening. The surviving documentation follows the panel through later places and owners, not back to a named first patron.[1][2]
A recent study of dealer Stefano Bardini’s business adds a narrower account of the final move from Italy. Lynn Catterson reports that the panel was with Bardini by 1903 and that his associate Albert E. Harnisch mediated its 1907 acquisition by the Havemeyers, who bought it as a Filippo Lippi. This fills part of the gap between the Baglioni villa and New York while showing how an attribution could change in the art market. Catterson calls its present attribution “after Botticelli”; the Met’s current object record instead says “Attributed to Botticelli.” The latter is the museum label used here. The dealer trail and the artist label are separate questions.[5][1][2]
The former church location is nevertheless useful. It places the painting in a history of devotional images, not merely in a modern museum sequence. Its subject offers viewers Mary and the child close enough for their touch to carry the meaning of the scene. The angels help support and witness that relationship. Whether seen in a church or in a collection, the image directs attention first to the human closeness of the sacred figures, then lets the landscape widen the view.
Which Madonna and Child with Two Angels?
The title belongs to more than one Renaissance painting. Filippo Lippi's Uffizi panel is the influential model, not this Met object. Other Botticelli-associated paintings with two angels are held in Naples, Strasbourg and Washington. The New York painting is identified by its present oval format, Mary's bowed profile, the child reaching up, the supporting angel at lower right, the second face behind and the Met accession number 29.100.17.[1][2][3]
For this particular panel, its qualified attribution is part of the story. The scene is visually direct, but the question of who painted it has moved through different scholarly judgements. Its relationship to Lippi's model is clear; its first commission and exact date are not. Keeping those distinctions intact makes the painting more interesting to look at, because we can see both the confidence of its composition and the limits of what its records tell us.
Botticelli and related artworks
Discussion
Look again at the details and evidence discussed above. Which part of the painting changes most when you know its history?
These prompts invite close looking and source-led questions rather than a single settled interpretation.
Reader Insights
How do Mary, the child and the two angels fit within the oval?
Which similarities to Filippo Lippi’s Uffizi painting are clearest?
How does the qualified attribution affect the way you describe this work?
Join the Conversation
Share an observation or question about the painting below.
References
- Metropolitan Museum of Art, “Madonna and Child with Two Angels,” accession 29.100.17, current object record; accessed 29 September 2026 View source.
- Federico Zeri, with Elizabeth E. Gardner, Italian Paintings: Florentine School: A Catalogue of the Collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, vol. 1 (New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1971), 93–94 View source.
- Uffizi Galleries, “Madonna and Child with Two Angels,” Filippo Lippi, inventory 1890/1598, current object record; accessed 29 September 2026 View source.
- Fondazione Federico Zeri, “Madonna con Bambino e angeli,” photo archive record for Met 29.100.17; accessed 29 September 2026 View source.
- Lynn Catterson, “Stefano Bardini’s Sculptor from Philadelphia: A. E. Harnisch & the Manufacture of Italian Renaissance Sculpture in the Late Nineteenth Century”, Predella 53 (2023), p. 67 (PDF p. 16), on Bardini, Harnisch, the 1907 Havemeyer acquisition and the historical Filippo Lippi attribution; consulted 1 October 2026. Its description of the current attribution differs from the Met’s present object label View source.
- Image credit. Madonna and Child with Two Angels, attributed to Sandro Botticelli. H. O. Havemeyer Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 29.100.17. Public Domain. Image shown at no more than its 491-pixel source width.











