Nastagio: Forest Banquet

Explore Botticelli art prints
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

A closer look

Guests sit at a long table beneath pine trees when a horse breaks into the clearing. A naked woman runs ahead of it, hounds close at her heels, while the armoured rider leans forward. People rise, turn and scatter. Plates and cups remain on the cloth as the feast loses its order. This is the third panel of The Story of Nastagio degli Onesti: the moment when a terrifying chase is deliberately brought before a wedding party's future guests.^[1][2]

The painting is P002840 in the Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid. The museum dates it to 1483, calls its technique “mixed method” on panel, and records its size as 83.5 × 142.5 cm. It is one of four long scenes based on a tale in Giovanni Boccaccio's Decameron. Three are in the Prado; the fourth is in a private collection. The museum's public metadata names Sandro Botticelli, but technical study gives this particular panel a more precise collaborative history: Botticelli's drawing beneath the paint and Bartolomeo di Giovanni's execution of the painted surface.^[1][2]

The title of the complete series can obscure which event belongs to which object. P002838 shows Nastagio's first sight of the ghostly hunt. P002839 shows its gruesome continuation. P002840, the subject here, returns the hunt to the woods in front of invited diners. The final panel depicts the wedding feast after the threatened woman agrees to marry Nastagio. The long route name “Banquet in the Pine Forest” helps distinguish this third scene from that fourth banquet.^[1][2]

Contents

1. At a Glance
2. A Feast Prepared as a Trap
3. The Meaning of the Repeated Hunt
4. Heraldry in a Marriage Painting
5. Whose Hand Painted the Banquet?

A Feast Prepared as a Trap

In Boccaccio's story, Nastagio is a young man from Ravenna whose desired bride, a daughter of Paolo Traversari, has refused him. After he withdraws to the nearby woods, he sees a woman endlessly pursued by a knight and hounds. The knight says that they are both condemned to repeat this violent pursuit: he had killed himself when she rejected him, and she is punished for her response to his death. Nastagio learns that the spectacle returns every Friday. He then arranges a meal in the same place and invites the woman he hopes to marry, along with her family, to witness it.^[2][3]

This panel is the result of that plan. The first encounter happened to Nastagio without his preparation; the banquet happens because he knows what will occur. The woman fleeing the rider is not a diner who wandered from the table. She is the victim in the repeated apparition. The invited guests occupy the left and middle, where the meal has been laid out. Their shock is real within the story, but Nastagio's is no longer innocent surprise. He has made their fear part of his proposal.^[1][2][3]

The forest links this panel to the earlier paintings. Straight trunks and high crowns give the action a measured structure. At the feast, however, the trees also enclose a social gathering. A long white tablecloth and carefully placed vessels make the meal seem settled before the hunt cuts across its edge. The rider and dogs run parallel to the table, their speed opposing the still geometry of dining. The contrast is what allows the apparition to work so forcefully on the guests.^[1]

The Met's close reading draws attention to the feast's material abundance: metal plates bearing fruit and sweets, glass vessels, and musical instruments laid aside when the chase breaks in. Those objects matter to the story's timing. The guests were not gathered to witness a punishment; they were enjoying a carefully supplied meal. Nastagio alone arranged both the hospitality and the interruption. The decorated woven screen behind the diners, topped with greenery, also makes this a prepared social occasion rather than a casual stop in the woods.^[5]

The painter spreads their reactions across the full width. Some figures lean away from the table, others turn to look, and a person in the foreground stands between us and the fleeing woman. No single startled face carries the whole meaning. The eye travels along the diners as the news of what they see seems to travel among them. Across the middle of the panel, horse, hounds and victim connect the seated group to the deeper grove where the hunt has come from.^[1]

The Meaning of the Repeated Hunt

The Prado explains that the second panel shows the knight cutting the woman's heart out and feeding it to the hounds. The first panel introduced her flight; here the threat reappears before a new audience. The painted banquet does not need to show every stage of the punishment again. Its force depends on the invited viewers recognising the chase and hearing the knight's account, just as Nastagio had earlier. The tale makes repetition a device both within the supernatural punishment and within the four-panel visual story.^[2][3]

At the far right of the third painting, another small group appears near a tent. The Prado reads this as the next stage of the story: a servant comes from Nastagio's desired bride to convey that she will accept marriage. The picture therefore folds response into spectacle. It is not simply a snapshot of a horse crossing the dinner; it lets the viewer see the outcome Nastagio sought, while the disorderly feast still fills the centre.^[1][2]

The traditional ending presents this as the successful resolution of his courtship. Read closely, the choice offered to the bride is constrained by the image he has arranged for her to see. She has witnessed a woman hunted and killed because she resisted a man. The painting itself records her fear through the banquet's disruption. Describing that pressure does not require inventing the bride's private feelings; it follows from Nastagio's timing and from the punishment that the guests are made to observe.^[2][3]

Bayer's Met catalogue entry also describes a possible warning directed at the groom. The ghostly knight wasted his life through despair and suicide; before the hunt, Nastagio was spending his wealth and energy on an unreturned pursuit. In that reading, the series presses both partners towards a socially approved marriage. It is an interpretation, not a message preserved in a Pucci commission contract, and it does not remove the coercive force of what Nastagio shows the woman. It helps explain why a marriage household might have chosen a tale with such a disturbing middle.^[5]

Heraldry in a Marriage Painting

The Prado identifies the series as a commission by Antonio Pucci for the 1483 marriage of his son Giannozzo to Lucrezia Bini. On the third panel, the Pucci and Bini coats of arms flank those of the Medici. Those signs bring the patrons' social world into Boccaccio's Ravenna. The scene of a staged feast would be encountered by people who knew the real marriage for which the pictures were made.^[1][2]

The Prado's fuller Spanish entry says the real marriage occurred between late 1482 and early 1483 and that the panels were painted in the first half of 1483. The museum's encyclopaedia describes Lorenzo de' Medici as a mediator in arranging Giannozzo's second marriage, which helps explain the Medici arms between those of the two families. The coats of arms therefore refer to a specific alliance as well as a general atmosphere of Medici influence. The Prado suggests that some figures may represent members of the families, but it does not securely identify individual diners as portraits.^[2][4]

The heraldry does not make every character a portrait of a wedding guest, and it does not soften the tale's violence. It fixes the work's original family context more firmly than many Renaissance domestic pictures permit. The panel joins a literary warning about courtship to a material celebration of a specific union. That tension is worth keeping visible: the painting was made for a marriage, and the depicted marriage is secured by a frightening public lesson.^[1][2]

As a spalliera, a long narrative panel for a domestic wall, the picture suited an interior where viewers could move along its width. The four scenes could be read together, but each has a different role. This one concentrates the act of looking inside the story. Nastagio becomes the organiser of an audience, the guests watch the hunt, and we watch them. The panic at the table is the mechanism by which the supernatural event becomes social power.^[1][2]

Whose Hand Painted the Banquet?

The Prado's technical examination complicates a simple “by Botticelli” label. Infrared study finds more visible underdrawing in P002840 than in the two earlier Prado panels. The brush-drawn plan is graceful and loose, and the painted forms do not always follow it exactly. The museum's cited conservation interpretation concludes that Botticelli made that underlying drawing while Bartolomeo di Giovanni carried out the entire painted surface. The general catalogue still lists Botticelli as author because the design belongs to his series, but the object record supplies the more specific account of making.^[1][2]

This distinction matters to how the picture is described. Botticelli can be credited with the conception and preparatory drawing of the banquet without assigning every face, tree and painted fold to his brush. Bartolomeo's role is substantial, not a small final touch. A viewer can still follow the visual decisions that structure the feast and the sudden chase while recognising that Renaissance workshops could divide design and execution between artists.^[1]

The Prado traces the panel from the Pucci collection through several European owners before Francisco Cambó's collection; it entered the museum with his 1941 bequest. Today the three Prado panels can be viewed as successive parts of the same commission, while the fourth remains separately held. Their history reinforces the need to use the inventory number when discussing a specific scene. “The Story of Nastagio” names a cycle, not one single canvas or panel.^[1][2]

In P002840, the meal's carefully set table makes the interruption legible. The rider and hounds are terrifying, but the deeper change lies among those watching. Nastagio has taken an event that once startled him and chosen the time and audience for its return. Botticelli's design and Bartolomeo's painting hold that moral discomfort within an elegant grove: the same picture shows a festive commission, a repeated assault and the fear used to obtain a marriage.^[1][2][3]

References

1. Museo Nacional del Prado, “Scenes from the Story of Nastagio degli Onesti,” P002840, third-panel object record and technical discussion, accessed through indexed Prado text 29 September 2026 View source.
2. Museo Nacional del Prado, “Scenes from the Story of Nastagio degli Onesti,” series catalogue account, accessed through indexed Prado text 29 September 2026 View source.
3. Giovanni Boccaccio, “Fifth Day, Eighth Tale,” Decameron Web at Brown University, original Italian text, accessed 29 September 2026 View source.
4. Museo Nacional del Prado, “Escenas de La historia de Nastagio degli Onesti,” Spanish third-panel object entry, with commission chronology and heraldry, accessed 29 September 2026 View source.
5. Andrea Bayer, “The Banquet in the Pinewoods: Scene Three of The Story of Nastagio degli Onesti,” in Art and Love in Renaissance Italy, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2008, cat. 139, pp. 300–303, especially p. 302; accessed 1 October 2026 View source View source.

More BOTTICELLI Artworks

The Birth of Venus

Primavera

Venus and Mars

Adoration of the Magi

Madonna of the Magnificat

Pallas and the Centaur

The Mystical Nativity

Fortitude