Boy Bitten by a Lizard
Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Page Created on / Page Updated on
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

Boy Bitten by a Lizard: Caravaggio's London Painting

Caravaggio's Boy Bitten by a Lizard catches a youth in the instant he jerks back from an unseen danger among fruit and flowers. A lizard clings to his finger; his mouth opens and his free hand rises. The National Gallery in London owns this canvas, NG6504, and dates it to about 1594–95. The “1596” in this page's inherited address is an older label, not the owner's current object date.[1]

Another, closely related version is in the Fondazione Roberto Longhi, Florence. The National Gallery calls it a high-quality replica considered by many scholars to be another Caravaggio. That qualified Florence attribution should not weaken the clear identity of London's accepted painting, nor should findings about this canvas be assigned to the Florence one without evidence.[1][2]

Caravaggio in context

At a Glance

  • ArtistMichelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio[1]
  • TitleBoy bitten by a Lizard[1]
  • Dateabout 1594–95 in the National Gallery's current catalogue; URL suffix “1596” is inherited[1]
  • Mediumoil on canvas[1]
  • Dimensions66 × 49.5 cm, height × width[1]
  • CollectionNational Gallery, London, NG6504; acquired 1986[1]
  • Related versionFondazione Roberto Longhi, Florence, 65.8 × 52.3 cm, attribution debated[1][2]

Contents

  1. A Moment of Surprise
  2. The Fruit, Flowers and Glass Vase
  3. Possible Meanings
  4. What Technical Study Found
  5. Provenance and Acquisition
  6. The Florence Version
  7. Why the Date in the URL Differs
  8. Frequently Asked Questions

A Moment of Surprise

The boy's hand has reached toward the foreground arrangement. A tiny lizard bites him, and his face and body recoil. Caravaggio makes the reaction the main event rather than painting a static display of fruit. The National Gallery calls such a sudden moment of action unusual in a late sixteenth-century picture, and notes how the work helped bring the artist attention in Rome.[1]

The physical sequence is easy to trace. The bitten finger sits among foliage, the arm leads to the startled face, and the free hand rises as the shoulders twist. The lizard is small enough that a first glance may register the shout before its cause. This delayed discovery makes the viewer repeat the boy's attention: look at the beautiful still life, then notice the danger inside it.

The face is near the upper part of a narrow canvas. The body turns out of a loose white shirt, leaving a shoulder exposed. Darker leaves and fruit cluster below. The contrast between flesh and vegetation gives both elements force. It is neither merely a portrait nor merely a still life; the two depend on each other for the action.[1]

The Fruit, Flowers and Glass Vase

The National Gallery identifies cherries and plums in the foreground, and a rose and sprig of jasmine in a glass vase. The curved glass contains a small reflection of a room. These observations are specific to its NG6504 canvas; the reflection is easy to miss in a small reproduction.[1]

The arrangement is attractive before it becomes dangerous. Fruit suggests ripeness; flowers suggest fragrance and delicacy; glass displays the painter's ability to handle transparency and reflected light. A lizard among the leaves changes the meaning of the hand reaching toward them. The painting does not require a written warning in order to tell the story.

The vase can also show how carefully one must distinguish close looking from overclaiming. Its reflection may record a real studio arrangement, but it does not automatically prove the exact shape of Caravaggio's room or the use of a particular optical device. The painting is evidence of a painted reflection. Further conclusions need technical or documentary support.[1][3]

Possible Meanings

The National Gallery says the picture's precise meaning is uncertain. It suggests several possibilities: the pain that can follow attraction or love, the transience of beauty associated with a rose, or the sense of touch. None is presented as an established code. The immediate visual story can support more than one symbolic reading.[1]

The youth's rose behind an ear, exposed shoulder and surprised expression have encouraged erotic or theatrical interpretations. They may be useful, but the painting does not come with Caravaggio's explanatory text. No single moral is established by the fruit and flowers alone.

The National Gallery's 2025 account quotes Baglione's later reaction that a viewer could almost hear the boy scream. This is a biographer's description, written after Caravaggio's death, not a quotation from the artist. It captures the work's sense of immediacy while reminding us that historical reception and painterly intent are different categories.[4]

What Technical Study Found

Larry Keith's article in the National Gallery Technical Bulletin examined NG6504 alongside two other London Caravaggios. It reports a warm transparent ground used as a middle tone in areas of flesh and hair, egg tempera in some white paint, and walnut oil elsewhere. It also discusses incised lines and broad preparatory brush marks. These are material observations from this owner museum's study, not a blanket description of every Caravaggio canvas.[3]

The findings complicate a familiar slogan that Caravaggio worked with no preparation. A painter can work directly and rapidly from a model while also setting positions with brush marks or incisions and making choices about grounds and media. The painting-technique guide compares such object-level studies across several paintings instead of declaring one universal method.[3]

Technical evidence helps describe how the visible picture was built. It does not settle the painting's allegory or identify the sitter. Nor can it authenticate the Florence version by proxy. That canvas would need its own examination and comparison if the precise material relationship is to be argued.[2][3]

Provenance and Acquisition

The National Gallery's object record traces the painting with certainty to Sir Paul Methuen's collection and then, by 1809, to Viscount Harcourt at Nuneham. In the nineteenth century it carried an attribution to Murillo. It was sold at Christie's in 1948, later belonged to film producer Vincent Korda, and was bought by the National Gallery in 1986 with support from the J. Paul Getty Jr Endowment Fund.[1]

That history shows that even a famous Caravaggio can travel through changing names. The Murillo attribution belongs to a phase of reception and cataloguing; it is not evidence that the present museum regards the picture as Murillo. Conversely, the early documentary record is not a continuous account back to Caravaggio's studio. A measured provenance section identifies the first secure points and the later transfers without inventing missing owners.

The museum currently lists the painting in Room 32. Room placement is useful to a visitor but can change, especially during loans and displays. The durable identity for a page is NG6504. It keeps the painting distinct from both the Florence version and the National Gallery's later Caravaggios, The Supper at Emmaus and Salome Receives the Head of John the Baptist.[1]

The Florence Version

The Fondazione Roberto Longhi holds another canvas of the same subject, 65.8 × 52.3 cm. Its own record preserves multiple historical date proposals. The National Gallery describes it as a high-quality replica, considered by many to have been painted by Caravaggio himself. This wording is important: there is a serious argument for another autograph work, but the position is qualified.[1][2]

The two existing site images were visually compared with the National Gallery's owner image. The darker image currently assigned to this -1596/ route matches NG6504. The warmer, brighter image on the Florence page corresponds to the Longhi version. That avoids the most damaging form of page error: giving London provenance and technical results to a photograph of Florence or vice versa.

Comparison can focus on framing, colour, the glass vase, fruit and the boy's pose. Small web images may obscure the handling of paint and distort tones.

Why the Date in the URL Differs

This page's address contains “1596,” but the National Gallery now dates NG6504 to about 1594–95. The older date in the address is an inherited identifier; the museum's current catalogue date describes the painting.[1]

Revised museum dates need not erase a familiar address. What matters for understanding the work is the current catalogue date and the reason the two numbers differ.

The Florence object's date is less settled still. The Longhi Foundation record preserves various scholarly datings, including 1592–93 and c.1597. These should not be forced into London's 1594–95 range merely because the pictures resemble each other. Each page has its own object and source.[1][2]

Explore the Caravaggio collection

94 pages

NameDateType
Adoration of the Shepherds by Caravaggio: The Messina Nativity1608–09; precise order relative to Resurrection of Lazarus remains unresolvedArtwork
Amor Victorious by Caravaggio1601–02 in the Berlin owner recordArtwork
Bacchus by Caravaggio: The Uffizi Paintingabout 1598, according to the UffiziArtwork
Basket of Fruit by Caravaggioafter 1597, probably around the turn of the seventeenth century, according to the AmbrosianaArtwork
Boy Bitten by a Lizard: Caravaggio's London Paintingabout 1594–95 in the National Gallery's current catalogue; URL suffix “1596” is inheritedArtwork
Boy Bitten by a Lizard: The Florence Version Attributed to Caravaggiodisputed; Longhi's catalogue record preserves historical 1592–93 and other proposed ranges, including c.1597Artwork
Boy Peeling Fruit by Caravaggio: The Royal Collection Paintingabout 1592–93 in the owner's current exhibition recordArtwork
Boy Peeling Fruit in Florence: A Derivation from Caravaggio—Artwork
Boy with a Basket of Fruit by Caravaggioabout 1595 in the Galleria Borghese catalogueArtwork
Caravaggio Paintings in Rome: Churches, Museums and a Practical Route—Guide
Caravaggio Quotes: What the Documents Actually Record—Guide
Caravaggio's Lute Player: The Del Monte Painting Once Shown at the Metabout 1596–97 in the Met catalogueArtwork
Caravaggio's Painting Technique: Grounds, Incisions, Revisions and Light—Guide
Christ at the Column by Caravaggio: The Rouen Flagellationc.1606 in the owner caption; owner prose gives 1606–07Artwork
Christ on the Mount of Olives by Caravaggio: The Lost Berlin Painting—Artwork
Conversion on the Way to Damascus by Caravaggioabout 1601 in the Roma Capitale church recordArtwork
Crowning with Thorns by Caravaggio: The Vienna Paintingabout 1603 in the 2019 KHM record; “1607” is an inherited URL suffixArtwork
Crowning with Thorns in Prato: Attributed to Caravaggioabout 1602–03 in the collection presentationArtwork
David with the Head of Goliath by Caravaggio: The Borghese Painting1606–07 or 1609–10 in the Galleria Borghese catalogue; the later Naples period is favoured by many scholars, while the owner keeps the question openArtwork
David with the Head of Goliath by Caravaggio: The Prado Paintingabout 1600 in Prado material; “1599” survives only in the legacy URLArtwork
David with the Head of Goliath by Caravaggio: The Vienna Paintingabout 1600–01 in the KHM's 2019 exhibition record; “1607” is a legacy route labelArtwork
Did Caravaggio Make Drawings? What Survives and What Paintings Reveal—Guide
Ecce Homo: Caravaggio's Madrid Rediscovery and the Genoa Painting—Artwork
John the Baptist in Caravaggio's Paintings: A Guide to the Different Versions—Artwork
Judith Beheading Holofernes by Caravaggiobeginning of the seventeenth century in the owning museum's account; about 1599–1600 in the Kimbell's 2025 loan label; around 1602 in one specialist catalogueArtwork
Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto: Caravaggio's Ludovisi Ceilingabout 1597; the archive connects the work with Cardinal del Monte's 1597 commissionArtwork
Madonna and Child with Saint Anne by Caravaggio: The Palafrenieri Altarpiece1605 in the Galleria Borghese object field; completed and delivered by 8 April 1606Artwork
Madonna of Loreto by Caravaggio: The Pilgrims at Sant'Agostinobroadly c.1604–06; institutional records differ slightly in their starting yearArtwork
Madonna of the Rosary by Caravaggio: The Vienna Altarpiecearound 1603 in the Kunsthistorisches Museum's object recordArtwork
Martha and Mary Magdalene by Caravaggio: The Detroit Paintingabout 1598 in the Detroit Institute of Arts recordArtwork
Medusa by Caravaggio: The Uffizi Painted Shield1596–98 in the Uffizi's virtual exhibition; specialist research reports the shield delivered to the Medici wardrobe by 7 September 1598Artwork
Narcissus, Attributed to Caravaggiodependent on attribution; the Zeri catalogue gives a broad 1610–50 range under SpadarinoArtwork
Nativity with Saint Francis and Saint Lawrence: Caravaggio's Missing Paintingsomewhere in 1600–09 in the parliamentary report; a specific 1609 execution and place remain debatedArtwork
Penitent Mary Magdalene by Caravaggio1597 in the owner's catalogue, during Caravaggio's early Roman activityArtwork
Portrait of a Courtesan: Caravaggio's Lost Berlin PortraitBerlin's data field says c.1590, while its own text compares a Caravaggio work of c.1598; precise date unresolvedArtwork
Portrait of Alof de Wignacourt and His Page by Caravaggio—Artwork
Portrait of Fra Antonio Martelli? Caravaggio's Pitti Knight of Malta1608 in the Restituzioni object heading; within Caravaggio's Malta periodArtwork
Portrait of Maffeo Barberini: The Seated Corsini Paintingc.1596–97 in the national catalogueArtwork
Portrait of Monsignor Maffeo Barberini: Caravaggio's Newly Acquired Paintingaround the late 1590s / age thirty; “1598” in the inherited address is approximate, not an exact document dateArtwork
Portrait of Pope Paul V: A Caravaggio Attribution and a Borghese Copy—Artwork
Prints After Caravaggio: Who Made Them and What They Show—Guide
Reclining Saint John the Baptist: A Disputed Caravaggio Attributionoften proposed for the artist's final years; the later museum list does not give a precise year.Artwork
Rest on the Flight into Egypt by Caravaggioabout 1597 in the owner's catalogueArtwork
Saint Catherine of Alexandria by Caravaggio: The Thyssen Paintingabout 1598–99 in the Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza catalogueArtwork
Saint Francis in Meditation by Caravaggio: The Cremona Painting1603–06 in the owner account; c.1605–06 in a KHM exhibition captionArtwork
Saint Francis in Prayer: Caravaggio's Carpineto Painting1606 in a 2016–17 exhibition work listArtwork
Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy by Caravaggioc.1595–96 in the owner wall textArtwork
Saint Jerome in Meditation: Caravaggio's Montserrat Painting1605 in the owner record; an owner publication reports scholarship placing it about 1605–06Artwork
Saint Jerome Writing by Caravaggio: The Borghese Paintingc.1606 in the owner catalogue; the “1605” URL suffix is inheritedArtwork
Saint Jerome Writing by Caravaggio: The Malta Paintingaround 1607–08; foundation dates Malaspina's commission to 1608Artwork
Saint John in the Wilderness at Toledo Cathedralexact 1598 not established by the cited cathedral account.Artwork
Saint John the Baptist at Galleria Corsini, Romeabout 1606 in the national record; older proposals ranged from the late 1590s onward.Artwork
Saint John the Baptist at the Capitoline Museums, Rome1602.Artwork
Saint John the Baptist at the Galleria Borghese1609–10 in the current Borghese record.Artwork
Saint John the Baptist at the Spring: The Bonello Painting in Maltaearly seventeenth century in the institutional account; a precise 1608 is not established there.Artwork
Saint Matthew and the Angel: Caravaggio's Lost First Altarpiece—Artwork
Salome Receives the Head of John the Baptist: Caravaggio's London Paintingabout 1609–10, likely late Naples period in the Gallery's accountArtwork
Salome with the Head of John the Baptist: Caravaggio's Madrid Painting—Artwork
Sleeping Cupid by Caravaggio: The Painting Made in Maltaabout 1608, Malta periodArtwork
Still Life with Fruit on a Stone Ledge: Is It by Caravaggio?—Artwork
Supper at Emmaus (1606): Caravaggio's Brera Painting—Artwork
The Annunciation by Caravaggio in Nancyc.1607–10 in the collection record; 1608–10 in the museum's restoration accountArtwork
The Basel Saint John the Baptist: Once Labelled Caravaggio, Now Maínoabout 1608–10 in that schedule, rather than the legacy URL's 1600.Artwork
The Beheading of Saint John the Baptist by Caravaggioabout 1608; installed in the Oratory on 29 August 1608Artwork
The Burial of Saint Lucy by Caravaggio in Syracuse1608, during Caravaggio's Syracuse stayArtwork
The Calling of Saint Matthew by Caravaggioabout 1599–1600Artwork
The Calling of Saints Peter and Andrew by Caravaggioabout 1602–04 in the Trust's object textArtwork
The Cardsharps by Caravaggioabout 1596–97 in the Kimbell's current object recordArtwork
The Conversion of Saint Paul: Caravaggio's Odescalchi Panelcommissioned in 1600; painted around 1600–01Artwork
The Crucifixion of Saint Andrew by Caravaggio1606–07Artwork
The Crucifixion of Saint Peter by Caravaggioabout 1601Artwork
The Death of the Virgin by Caravaggiocommissioned 1601; completed late 1605 or early 1606, according to the LouvreArtwork
The Denial of Saint Peter by Caravaggio1610Artwork
The Doria Pamphilj Saint John the Baptist: A Second Youth with a Ramlinked compositionally to the Capitoline 1602 picture; an exact production year for this canvas is not established by the owner pages used here.Artwork
The Entombment of Christ by Caravaggio: The Vatican Depositionabout 1600–04 in Vatican Museums publication materialArtwork
The Flagellation of Christ by Caravaggio: The Capodimonte Altarpiecearound 1607, in the first Naples periodArtwork
The Fortune Teller by Caravaggio: The Louvre Version and Its Roman Counterpart—Artwork
The Holy Family with the Infant Saint John the Baptist by Caravaggioearly 1600s in the Met catalogue; no more exact owner date asserted hereArtwork
The Incredulity of Saint Thomas by Caravaggioabout 1601 in the SPSG presentationArtwork
The Inspiration of Saint Matthew by Caravaggiousually 1602; also catalogued 1602–03, for the installed final altarpieceArtwork
The Lute Player by Caravaggio: The Hermitage Paintingabout 1596 in the Hermitage collection publication; the Hermitage Friends restoration page gives about 1595–96Artwork
The Magdalen in Ecstasy: Caravaggio, Copies and a Disputed Original—Artwork
The Martyrdom of Saint Matthew by Caravaggio1599–1600; unveiled with The Calling in 1600Artwork
The Martyrdom of Saint Ursula by Caravaggio—Artwork
The Musicians by Caravaggio1597Artwork
The Resurrection of Lazarus by Caravaggio in Messina1609; delivered 10 June 1609 in the owner accountArtwork
The Sacrifice of Isaac by Bartolomeo Cavarozzi: A Former Caravaggio Attributionabout 1615–17 in the Nicholas Hall catalogue; “1598” is an inherited URL label, not the accepted dateArtwork
The Sacrifice of Isaac by Caravaggio: The Uffizi Paintingabout 1603 in the Uffizi catalogueArtwork
The Seven Works of Mercy by Caravaggio1606–07, according to the Pio MonteArtwork
The Supper at Emmaus by Caravaggio: The London Painting1601Artwork
The Taking of Christ by Caravaggio1602Artwork
The Toulouse *Judith Beheading Holofernes*: A Caravaggio Attribution Debatec.1606–07 if identified with the recorded Naples work; that identification is debatedArtwork
Young Sick Bacchus by Caravaggioabout 1595 in the Galleria Borghese catalogueArtwork
Youth with a Ram: Why Caravaggio's Saint John Looks So Unusual—Artwork

Discussion

Share a close observation about Boy Bitten by a Lizard or a source that clarifies its history.

Close looking

Which detail changes your reading?

Evidence

Is there a collection record or document worth comparing?

Open question

What remains uncertain?

Join the Conversation

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Boy Bitten by a Lizard is in London?

The National Gallery's accepted Caravaggio painting, inventory NG6504, is in London. The Fondazione Roberto Longhi holds a separate related canvas in Florence.[1][2]

When did Caravaggio paint the London picture?

The National Gallery dates it to about 1594–95. “1596” in the inherited URL should not be read as its current catalogue date.[1]

What bites the boy?

A small lizard in the fruit and flowers bites his finger, prompting his recoil. The museum identifies the animal and the moment clearly.[1]

Does the painting have a fixed symbolic meaning?

No single reading is established. The National Gallery suggests possible links with the pain of love, the transience of beauty and the sense of touch.[1]

Is the Florence picture another original Caravaggio?

Many scholars have considered it autograph, but the National Gallery presents that view as qualified. The Florence page keeps the attribution debate explicit.[1][2]

References

  1. National Gallery, London, Caravaggio, Boy bitten by a Lizard, NG6504, owner object record, interpretation and provenance.
  2. Fondazione di Studi di Storia dell'Arte Roberto Longhi, Ragazzo morso da un ramarro, Florence version record.
  3. Larry Keith, “Three Paintings by Caravaggio,” National Gallery Technical Bulletin 19, analysis of NG6504 and other London canvases.
  4. National Gallery, London, “Picture of the month: June 2025”, historical reception and possible meanings.

More CARAVAGGIO Artworks