%20Wassily%20Kandinsky.jpg)
by Tom Gurney
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Published on June 19, 2020 / Updated on October 14, 2023
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000
Improvisation 27 (Garden of Love II) by Wassily Kandinsky: Introduction
Figures are present in this painting, but they do not stand apart from their surroundings as solid bodies. Dark lines curl and cut through yellow, green, blue and red. Large colour masses overlap, and forms that might be heads, arms or torsos partly dissolve back into them. The Metropolitan Museum of Art identifies three iterations of an embracing couple, surrounded by serpentine forms. It catalogues Wassily Kandinsky's Improvisation 27 (Garden of Love II) as a 1912 oil on canvas, 120.3 × 140.3 cm, accession 49.70.1. The title points toward love and a garden; the museum suggests that biblical Eden is a likely reference, while leaving the painting's exact narrative open. [1].
This is a work in which recognition arrives slowly. One may first see a red sweep and a yellow central passage, then begin to gather bodies from the adjacent black lines. The museum's description helps identify recurring embraces without turning every serpentine line into a named creature. That balance matters. Kandinsky permits a subject to emerge, yet makes line and colour substantial experiences in their own right. The painting is neither a conventional depiction of a garden nor a collection of marks without any figurative ties. [1].
Watch: Wassily Kandinsky
Five museum videos about Kandinsky’s art, sources of inspiration and the relationship between colour and music.
Vasily Kandinsky: Around the Circle
Curator Megan Fontanella introduces Kandinsky and the Guggenheim collection.
Watch on YouTubeAt a Glance
- Artist and title:Wassily Kandinsky, Improvisation 27 (Garden of Love II).
- Date:1912, according to the owning museum.
- Medium and dimensions:Oil on canvas, 120.3 × 140.3 cm.
- Collection:The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, accession 49.70.1; Alfred Stieglitz Collection, 1949.
- Visible subject:The museum identifies three repeated embraces amid dark, curving lines and coloured masses; Eden is a likely interpretation of the subtitle, not a fully identified biblical episode.
- American history:Shown at the 1913 Armory Show; Alfred Stieglitz purchased it through dealer Hans Goltz that year, according to Met research.
- Image:Existing local splash retained. The Met explicitly restricts enlargement and download of its image; no replacement or new guide image is sourced.
Where this work sits in Kandinsky’s career
The Blue Rider
1903Composition VII
1913Composition VIII
1923Several Circles
1926Sky Blue
1940Contents
- Finding the three embraces
- Colour, line and an unstable setting
- The painting at the 1913 Armory Show
- Scale, display and image rights
- Frequently asked questions
- References
Finding the three embraces
The Met's short interpretation is a useful key because an embrace is easier to miss than a sharply outlined figure. In the left portion of the painting, a dark contour bends around pale and green passages. Elsewhere, forms gather around the large warm centre and toward the right, but their boundaries remain uncertain. The museum sees three iterations of a couple, not a single person repeated with portrait consistency. That phrasing leaves space for the painting's varying degrees of legibility. The viewer has to move between a figure and the abstract colour that surrounds or penetrates it. [1].
Dark, snake-like strokes wind among these forms. The owner calls them serpentine forms, an accurate description of their movement and appearance that stops short of saying they are all literal snakes. The subtitle Garden of Love II makes an Eden reading plausible, and the museum explicitly offers that as a likely reference. Yet it does not identify Adam and Eve in each embrace, a particular tree, a single serpent or a fixed sequence of events. The painting can evoke a biblical garden without acting as a narrative diagram. [1].
The Roman numeral II belongs to the museum's title and should be retained. It signals a title within a related sequence, but this page concerns one object: the Met oil, accession 49.70.1. Numbering does not make another Garden of Love study or painting interchangeable with it. The safest way to preserve its identity is to keep the complete title, owner, date and dimensions together. That is especially important for a composition whose imagery may recur elsewhere in Kandinsky's work. [1].
The inherited article described a reclining bather and compared the picture to Degas and Renoir. Those names do not appear in the Met's account of this object, and the comparison diverted attention from the repeated embraces the owner actually identifies. A viewer might perceive a reclining form, but that is a visual impression, not enough to call the painting a bather scene or connect it to a specific artist. The revised account starts with the museum's description, then invites close looking at how Kandinsky makes the figures difficult to isolate. [1].
Colour, line and an unstable setting
The painting's dark lines are forceful but do not consistently fence off one object from another. A curve may suggest a shoulder at one moment and then continue into a longer movement across the image. The yellow and orange near the centre can pull the eye forward, while blue and green passages alter the apparent distance around them. A broad red area on the right weighs differently from the smaller marks around it. The result is a field where the eye keeps rebuilding the relationship among figures, colour and background. These are observations from the reproduction, anchored by the Met's description of dark lines and colourful abstract masses. [1].
That organisation helps explain why the three couples are not simply hidden details waiting to be circled. Kandinsky uses changing colour boundaries and dark contours to make the same broad human action appear in different visual circumstances. A couple can feel close and bodily in one passage, then almost absorbed into colour in another. The garden is not mapped by a path, fence or botanical inventory; it is suggested through the title and the environment of forms. The exact degree to which a mark represents plant, body or serpent remains open to careful viewing. [1].
The Met relates the painting to Kandinsky's Concerning the Spiritual in Art, in which he argued for an art capable of evoking emotional and spiritual experience through abstract forms and colour. This is a historical framework supplied by the museum, not a proof that every colour in this canvas has one fixed symbolic translation. The lesson from the object is more specific: a recognisable embrace can coexist with forms that exceed its outline, and a title can guide interpretation without exhausting the image. [1].
It is tempting to label the painting simply abstract, but that label alone hides its unusual tension. The repeated couples and serpent-like curves give a viewer motifs to follow. The active colour and discontinuous line prevent those motifs from settling into a single realistic scene. Kandinsky's handling of the subject is what makes it compelling: recognition is offered and then unsettled. The museum's Eden suggestion gains force from this tension, because an account of love, temptation or origin would have to be read through ambiguous pictorial signs rather than literal storytelling. [1].
The painting at the 1913 Armory Show
The work's American history is unusually clear. The Met identifies it as the single Kandinsky painting at the 1913 Armory Show, the International Exhibition of Modern Art held in New York. Alfred Stieglitz bought it in connection with that exhibition. A Met research entry on dealer Hans Goltz says Stieglitz purchased the canvas from Goltz in 1913. These sources support a focused provenance statement: the painting travelled into an American modernist collection soon after it was made. They do not require an invented account of every conversation or visitor reaction at the show. [2]; [3].
Stieglitz was already familiar with Kandinsky's thinking. The Met notes that excerpts from Concerning the Spiritual in Art appeared in his journal Camera Work in 1912. It describes Stieglitz as a collector and advocate whose New York galleries helped introduce European and American modern art. The purchase thus belongs to a documented encounter between Kandinsky's ideas and an American circle of artists, photographers and patrons. That context is more useful than treating the painting's importance as a vague step toward later abstraction. [2].
The Met received the Alfred Stieglitz Collection in 1949, which is the credit line attached to this painting. Its 2011–12 exhibition of that collection selected Improvisation 27 as a highlight. The painting therefore has two stories that can be told without merging them: its 1912 visual experiment in embracing figures and colour, and its later role in the American reception and collecting of modern art. The owner record and exhibition history link those stories to the same physical canvas, accession 49.70.1. [1]; [4].
Scale, display and image rights
At 120.3 × 140.3 cm, this is a large canvas whose colour masses and dark contours can engage a viewer at bodily scale. A small web reproduction makes the overall arrangement available but compresses the distinction among thin strokes, broad patches and surface texture. The Met's current online record lists the painting on view in Gallery 965 at the Fifth Avenue museum. Gallery placement can change, so the live collection page is the source to check before a visit. [1].
The existing site splash is retained. The Met explicitly says its object image cannot be enlarged, viewed full-screen or downloaded. Although the museum offers unrestricted reuse for designated open-access images, this particular object is presented with restrictions. That specific notice controls the sourcing decision here: no new file has been taken from the Met, no permission request is planned, and the forthcoming artist guide can use the verified text entry without promising a larger picture. The existing local image is sufficient for the page's current presentation. [1].
The painting rewards a patient path from line and colour toward its repeated human subject. A viewer can find the couples, wonder whether the curling forms make Eden present, and still see how little of a conventional garden Kandinsky supplies. Its exhibition and collection history document how swiftly that experiment entered an American discussion of modern art. Both the visual reading and the history become clearer when grounded in the Met's exact object rather than a generic account of Kandinsky's career. [1]; [2].
Kandinsky artworks directory
Frequently Asked Questions
The Metropolitan Museum of Art dates it to 1912. [1].
It is oil on canvas, 120.3 × 140.3 cm. [1].
The Met describes three iterations of an embracing couple, surrounded by serpentine forms amid colourful abstract masses. [1].
The Met says the subtitle likely refers to biblical Eden. It does not identify every figure or line as a particular biblical character or object. [1].
Yes. The Met says it was the single Kandinsky painting shown at the 1913 Armory Show and that Alfred Stieglitz bought it in connection with the exhibition. [2].
It belongs to The Metropolitan Museum of Art, accession 49.70.1, as part of the Alfred Stieglitz Collection, 1949. The current owner record lists it on view in Gallery 965; check that record for changes. [1].
Discussion
What do you notice first in Improvisation 27 (Garden of Love II)? Share a close observation or a question about the evidence for this work.
Comments are for comparing what we see and what the cited sources establish.
Reader Insights
Where do you first find one of the three embraces described by the Met?
How do the dark curling lines change the coloured areas around them?
What supports an Eden reading, and what remains open in the image?
Join the Conversation
Add your observation below and tell us which part of the artwork led you to it.
References
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Improvisation 27 (Garden of Love II), accession 49.70.1. View source.
- The Met, “Alfred Stieglitz (1864–1946) and His Circle”. View source.
- The Met, Hans Goltz research entry. View source.
- The Met, Stieglitz and His Artists: Matisse to O'Keeffe, 2011–12 exhibition. View source.
%20Wassily%20Kandinsky.jpg)
