Death and Life

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About Death and Life

Death leans towards a cluster of living bodies, grinning and holding a small raised club. Its narrow, dark form occupies the left side of Gustav Klimt's canvas. Life gathers opposite: an infant, women and men, youth and old age, tenderness, sleep, fear and erotic contact compressed into a single many-coloured island.

The gap between them is crucial. Death does not break into the group. It watches from a separate field. Most of the human figures keep their eyes shut or turn inward, apparently unaware of the threat. Only a young woman at the island's upper-left edge looks across with alarm.

This familiar arrangement is not the painting Klimt first showed. He began the canvas in 1910 and presented an earlier state in Rome in 1911. The first Death bowed its haloed head and seemed inwardly absorbed. The human group was smaller. Klimt reconsidered the picture in 1912/13, repainted it extensively around 1915–17 and enlarged the population of Life to nine. Photographs and reproductions preserve stages that the surviving surface replaced.^[1][2][3][4]

The work's history therefore belongs inside its meaning. Death and Life is not simply an allegory to decode. It is a painting Klimt kept testing in public: changing its title, its balance, the character of Death and the number of bodies that oppose it. The current image is the last known answer, not the only question he asked.

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• Current titleDeath and Life (Tod und Leben)
• Earlier exhibition titlesDeath in Rome in 1911; Death and Love in Dresden in 1912^[1]
• Initial painting1910/11
• RevisionsA first reworking in 1912/13; a major later campaign conventionally dated 1915/16 by the Leopold Museum and 1916/17 by the Klimt Database^[1][3][4]
• MediumOil on canvas^[1]
• Dimensions180.8 × 200.6 centimetres^[1]
• Signature“GUSTAV KLIMT” at lower left^[1]
• CollectionLeopold Museum, Vienna
• Inventory number630^[1]
• Principal structureA solitary personification of Death facing an oval group of nine human figures
• First-state evidenceA Moriz Nähr photograph, a Miethke portfolio colour lithograph, a 1913 colour magazine illustration and exhibition views^[2][3]
• Final-state evidenceThe surviving canvas and photographs of the 1917 Austrian Art Exhibition in Stockholm^[4]
• Current displayThe Leopold Museum's online record lists the painting on display on level OG4 as of August 2026^[1]

Annotated Details from Death and Life

The painting turns on a visual confrontation: Death is separated from, but fixed upon, the island of bodies.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Details from DEATH AND LIFE

These close views use the high-resolution public-domain source while keeping annotation markers in CSS rather than in the image file.

1

Death

The skeletal figure stands apart, frontal and watchful, rather than mingling with the human group.

2

Club

The club makes Death active in the final state without spelling out a narrative episode.

3

Human island

The bodies form a compact island of ages, contact and sleep rather than a literal family chart.

4

Child

The child anchors renewal inside the same group that remains exposed to Death's gaze.

5

Patterned enclosure

Pattern and colour bind the group together while keeping individual bodies partly legible.

6

Sleeping couple

The embracing adults turn life into a state of dependence and exposure, not heroic resistance.

7

Gap between groups

The empty space between Death and the bodies is the painting's crucial dramatic interval.

A Painting Divided in Two

The composition has the clarity of a confrontation. Death stands alone on the left. Life occupies the right as a compact population. Between them lies open ground.

The division is not perfectly symmetrical. Death is tall, thin and vertical. The human group is broad and approximately oval, made from bodies that overlap, bend and turn in several directions. One side is an individual; the other is a collective.

This imbalance gives the title more than one possible grammar. Death faces Life as an abstract force. One death threatens many lives. A single endpoint watches a multitude of ages and relations. The viewer can move among these meanings without deciding that each person illustrates a separate chapter in a universal biography.

The open interval keeps the opposition legible from a distance. It also delays action. Death's club is raised, but no strike occurs. The group is vulnerable, yet it is not physically invaded. Klimt built tension out of adjacency.

Scale and the Viewer's Position

At just over two metres wide and more than 1.8 metres high, Death and Life is close to the scale of a wall rather than a domestic cabinet picture. The Leopold Museum calls it Klimt's second-largest surviving painting.^[1][3]

Size changes the body's encounter with it. Death approaches human height, while the island becomes too large to take in as a collection of small emblems. From a distance the two silhouettes dominate: thin vertical against rounded mass. Closer inspection breaks Life into faces, limbs and fabrics.

The viewer occupies neither side. We stand before the interval and can see what most of the figures cannot. This frontal position creates an unsettling completeness: Death, the fearful girl and the sleeping bodies are available at once, though no person inside the painting commands the whole scene.

The large format also makes pattern architectural. Crosses and coloured textile units do not simply decorate clothing; they organise broad zones. Klimt's subject may be universal, but its force depends on the physical fact of a canvas capable of confronting a standing spectator.

Death in the Final Painting

The final figure of Death is a skeleton enclosed by a long hooded cloak. Its spine curves, its skull tilts forward and its empty sockets direct attention towards the people. Teeth form a grin that can look malicious because the figure appears alert to what most of the group ignores.^[1]

The garment turns bone into pattern. Dark blue, violet, green, black and white organise its surface, while repeated crosses make the cloak look ceremonial as well as ominous. Klimt Database relates those crosses to Christian death imagery.^[3] They do not establish a specific rite or denomination.

One bony hand emerges near the face; the other controls a small red club or cudgel. The object changes Death from a passive reminder into a possible agent. Yet it is neither a scythe nor a sword, and the painting shows no blow. The threat is prepared rather than completed.

Death's isolation intensifies its awareness. No ornament joins the cloak to the patterns across the gap. It has its own palette, contour and posture. The figure belongs to the same canvas but appears to inhabit a colder visual climate.

The First Death Was Different

Moriz Nähr's photograph of the 1910/11 state records a more inward personification. Death inclined its head and carried a halo-like circular form. The posture was static and almost meditative. The final skull instead looks outward, grins and raises the club.^[1][2]

This is not a minor restoration difference. Klimt changed the emotional relation between the halves of the painting. The first Death seemed absorbed by its own condition. The later figure observes Life and appears ready to act.

The earlier title Death suited a composition in which the solitary personification may have held greater conceptual priority. By Dresden in 1912, the work was exhibited as Death and Love. Later displays used Death and Life.^[1] Titles and paint changed in overlapping phases, so no one word can be assigned mechanically to one visual alteration.

The first state survives only in documentary images. It should not be described as though both Death figures remain on the present canvas. Klimt painted over one solution to produce another.

Earlier Motifs, Newly Combined

The cowled skeleton was not entirely new in Klimt's work. The Klimt Database relates it to the personifications of Death that appear in Hope I and Hope II. In Death and Life, crosses and the halo-like element developed this earlier figure through Christian funerary signs.^[3]

The piled human body also had a history. Klimt had used vertical streams and accumulations of people in the University Faculty Paintings. Those lost compositions set life stages within cosmic or medical uncertainty. Here he separated the human population from institutional knowledge and gave mortality its own facing figure.^[3]

These antecedents explain form more securely than they explain intention. Death and Life is not a sequel to either Hope painting, and its figures do not retain the Faculty Paintings' university programme. Klimt reused pictorial problems—pregnancy and infancy, crowded ages, a skeleton, isolation—under a new title and horizontal confrontation.

The combination was decisive. A personification that had once appeared within or behind female imagery now stands in a separate zone. A stream of humanity becomes a bounded island. Earlier motifs acquire new meaning because Klimt changes their spatial relations.

The Island of Life

Opposite Death, nine people form a densely connected enclosure in the final state. The Leopold Museum identifies an amorous couple, a mother holding an infant and an old woman among them.^[1][2] Other bodies extend the cluster without turning it into a literal family tree.

There is no ground beneath each person. Figures lean, float or rest against one another. Arms and shoulders pass across neighbouring forms. Patterned textiles help close gaps until the group reads almost as one organism.

The oval shape matters. It offers Life a boundary but not a fortress. A rose-like patterned edge near the late-added girl rounds the upper-left side; folded bodies complete the lower curve. The island seems self-contained precisely where Death makes self-containment impossible.

Touch circulates throughout the group. An infant depends on an adult body. Lovers turn towards each other. An elderly figure rests within the same enclosure as younger flesh. Care, desire and age appear together, not arranged in a left-to-right timeline.

Nine People, Not One Family

The final count of nine comes from the museum's comparison between the first-state photograph and the enlarged later composition.^[2] It describes visible persons, not documented identities.

An infant and mother invite kinship language. An embracing pair invites the word lovers. Beyond those relations, it is risky to assign every figure a role such as father, daughter, sister or grandparent. Klimt gave the island recognisable bonds without producing a genealogical portrait.

The distinction protects the allegory's breadth. Life is embodied through different dependencies: a baby held by an adult, erotic partners, bodies supporting other bodies and an old woman enclosed within the group. Biological family is one possible relation among several.

Nor do the nine people represent nine successive ages. Their positions overlap too strongly for a numbered progression. The island condenses simultaneous life rather than diagramming it.

The Open-Eyed Young Woman

At the upper-left edge of the final group, a young woman looks towards Death. Her eyes are wide, and her hands rise near her chest. The Leopold Museum reads the gesture as fear.^[1]

She is especially important because she was added late. Klimt Database notes that her inclusion completed the oval and that a rose-bush surround recalls floral forms used in the Stoclet project.^[3] This is a formal relation, not evidence that the woman belongs to the Stoclet narrative.

Her gaze breaks the group's prevailing inwardness. Most figures close their eyes, sleep, embrace or turn away. She alone appears to recognise the figure across the gap.

Awareness does not release her from the island. She remains enclosed by its bodies and pattern. Nor does she warn the others in an explicit action. Her fear becomes a local opening inside collective unawareness.

The addition altered more than the number of people. It introduced a psychological bridge between the two halves. Death's gaze now finds a human gaze in return.

From a Pyramid to an Oval

The first group rose more like a cone or pyramid. During the later repainting, Klimt added people to both lateral edges, broadened the mass and made its outer contour increasingly oval. The 1916 record already shows this expansion; the final girl and rose surround complete it.^[2][3][4]

Geometric change altered the group's emotional character. A pyramid suggests upward organisation and a base. An oval has no privileged beginning. It circulates the eye around sleeping heads, bent backs and patterned garments, making the people seem enclosed within a common membrane.

The broader shape also balances the composition without making it symmetrical. Death remains thin and exposed. Life becomes more populous and self-protective, but it also presents a larger surface to the watcher.

Klimt revised internal details as the boundary changed. Klimt Database notes that he shortened the hair of the young woman held by a man and altered garment patterns on both sides.^[3] These changes show that enlargement was not a matter of attaching extra figures to a finished core. Contour, identity and decorative rhythm were reconsidered together.

Mother and Infant

The mother-and-child relation places life's continuation near the centre of the allegory. The infant is held rather than isolated, its small body sheltered by an adult curve. The pair supplies the clearest image of dependence within the group.^[1][2]

Klimt does not set maternity apart in a sacred zone. Mother and child share the same compact field as lovers, old age and fear. Birth does not cancel mortality; it enters a population already watched by Death.

The adult's closed or lowered attention contributes to the island's dream-like quality. Care is active through bodily support even when the face does not confront the external threat.

It would be misleading to identify the woman and baby as portraits or to make them the origin of all the other figures. Their function is both specific and allegorical: one life is physically sustained by another.

Lovers and Bodily Continuity

Erotic contact supplies another form of connection. The lovers lean into one another so closely that individual contours become difficult to separate. Faces, shoulders and arms help bind the lower and central portions of the group.^[1]

In earlier Klimt paintings, ornament sometimes encloses a couple as though clothing created a shared shell. Here intimacy joins a much larger social body. The lovers do not occupy a private world; the infant, old woman and fearful girl remain near them.

Love is therefore part of Life without becoming its complete definition. The 1912 title Death and Love may direct attention to erotic union, but the final title better accommodates the enlarged range of ages and relations.

Sexuality also carries a double force. It suggests pleasure and generation, while the bent and sleeping bodies remain exposed to time. Klimt does not present desire as a magical victory over the skeleton.

The Old Woman

The old woman's head lies within the human cluster, above or near other folded figures. Her eyes close, her features turn inward and her patterned garment moves towards the cooler colours associated with Death.^[1][3]

Klimt Database treats that chromatic shift as a sign that she has approached Death's sphere.^[3] The interpretation is persuasive because it begins from a visible exception: warmer reds, pinks and oranges dominate much of Life, while her clothing is cooler.

Age does not expel her from the group. She remains physically enclosed by younger people. At the same time, her colour and face introduce difference within the apparent unity of the oval.

The figure resists a simple opposition in which Life occupies one side and Death the other. Mortality has already entered the human island through ageing. The skeleton is separate; the condition it personifies is not.

Bodies Below

Near the bottom of the group, bodies fold, lean and support weight. One female figure bends forward with her head close to a knee. Another body helps form the island's lower boundary. Their postures bring melancholy and physical heaviness into a composition often reproduced for its bright pattern.

The Leopold Museum's study record connects many 1908/09 drawings with this region, while warning that several are loose variations rather than exact preparations.^[5] Klimt explored how a seated or crouched woman could appear burdened, withdrawn and materially present.

These lower forms matter structurally. The upper figures can seem to float because the bent bodies below create a visual base. Yet no single person becomes a pedestal. Weight passes through contact.

The poses also complicate the word Life. Not every body expresses energy, youth or delight. Fatigue, grief and introspection belong inside the category.

Eyes Closed, Eyes Open

Vision distributes awareness across the painting. Death looks. The late-added young woman looks back. Most of the people do not.

Closed eyes can indicate sleep, erotic absorption, inward feeling or refusal. Klimt does not provide labels for each face. Their cumulative effect is more secure: the group is largely self-absorbed while danger remains visible to the viewer.

This creates an uncomfortable advantage. We see Death before most of Life does. The painting does not place us safely inside the island; it gives us a lateral view of both threat and unawareness.

The open-eyed woman prevents that advantage from becoming absolute. Human consciousness has begun to register the skeleton, but it has not reorganised the group. Knowledge appears as fear without rescue.

Colour as Opposition

Klimt built the two halves from different chromatic families. According to the Klimt Database, Death's cloak concentrates cool blue, violet and green with black and white. Life is dominated by warmer red, pink and orange, except where the old woman's cooler garment draws her towards mortality.^[3]

These observations support a symbolic reading because colour and subject reinforce each other. They should not become a rigid dictionary. Blue is not always death in Klimt, and red does not invariably mean life.

The final painting is significant within Klimt's development because bright colour has replaced the extensive gold associated with his most famous works. Pattern remains powerful, but it is carried by painted hue rather than by an overwhelmingly metallic surface.^[3]

Warmth does not make Life tranquil. Strong colour gathers bodies into a vivid mass, while the open-eyed girl's fear disturbs it. Coolness does not make Death inert. The dark figure is the most alert presence in the scene.

Crosses and Other Patterns

The cloak's crosses are the most legible repeated signs. Some are upright; others turn with the folds. Their Christian association gives Death a culturally familiar garment without converting the skeleton into a specific saint, priest or apocalyptic character.^[3]

Patterns within Life are more various. Floral, circular, rectangular and mosaic-like units change from garment to garment. They help preserve individual surfaces even as bodies interlock.

The contrast is not pattern against nature. Both sides are patterned. Death's garment repeats a narrow set of hard signs; Life contains more varied shapes and colours. Uniformity faces plurality.

Ornament also controls scale. Small motifs draw attention back to the flat canvas just as modelling persuades us that limbs and faces occupy space. Klimt keeps allegorical bodies between physical presence and decorative field.

The First State as Evidence

The first state is unusually well documented. Moriz Nähr photographed the painting around 1910/11. A colour lithograph appeared in the Miethke portfolio, and a colour illustration was published in Kunst für Alle in 1913. Exhibition photographs show the canvas in Rome and Dresden.^[2][3]

Each record answers a different question. Nähr's photograph is strong evidence for arrangement and tone, but not original colour. The period colour reproductions preserve historical impressions, though printing processes mediate hue. Exhibition views establish hanging context and public presence at a distance.

Together they permit responsible comparison. They show the bowed Death, the smaller life group and broad compositional relations before later repainting. They do not reproduce every brushstroke of the lost surface state.

The documentary set also proves that “first version” means an earlier appearance of the same canvas. Klimt did not make a second easel painting and discard the first. Revision converted the object.

What Reproductions Can Tell Us About Colour

The black-and-white photograph offers the clearest early structural witness. It distinguishes light and dark, documents the bowed skull and preserves the first group's outline. It cannot tell us directly whether two areas of similar grey were originally blue, green or red.

Period colour reproductions help, but they introduce another layer. A lithograph and a magazine illustration translate oil paint through inks, paper and editorial production. Their historical closeness makes them valuable evidence for how the first state was circulated; it does not make every printed hue identical to Klimt's surface.^[2][3]

The current canvas supplies original colour for the final state. Where a passage was thoroughly repainted, that colour cannot simply be projected backwards. Where a figure persisted, later glazing or pattern change may still have altered its effect.

This evidence hierarchy permits a rich comparison without pretending that the first palette survives intact. Structure is best secured through Nähr's photograph, historical colour impression through contemporary prints, and the last campaign through the painting itself.

Reworking in 1912/13

Recent Klimt Database research places an initial major reworking in 1912/13. The Dresden exhibition closed in October 1912, and by 4 March 1913 Klimt wrote to Emilie Flöge that he was working vigorously on the dead figure.^[3]

The letter confirms activity, not a complete inventory of changes. No photograph securely records exactly how the picture appeared at the Budapest exhibition opening days later. The name also shifted, but the surviving documents do not allow every title change to be matched with every repaint.^[3]

This first revision matters because it breaks the familiar story of a 1911 image suddenly transformed only in 1915. Klimt had already reopened the problem soon after its initial success.

Repeated public display may have sharpened his dissatisfaction. That is a reasonable inference from the sequence, not a documented motive. What is certain is that the canvas did not settle after Rome.

The Major Late Campaign

In December 1915, Egon Schiele told Anton Peschka that Klimt's Death and Life had been “completely repainted” for the Vienna Kunstschau at the Berlin Secession.^[4] The statement is valuable contemporary evidence, but the January 1916 catalogue image still shows an intermediate condition.

By then Death had changed substantially and additional figures appeared at the right. Yet the young woman who completes the final upper-left curve was not fully integrated in the documented Berlin state. Klimt continued after the exhibition.^[3][4]

This is why modern dates differ. The Leopold Museum labels the late reworking 1915/16; the Klimt Database uses 1916/17.^[1][3][4] Both acknowledge a campaign extending across conventional calendar boundaries rather than a single decisive day.

Stockholm exhibition photographs from September 1917 show the final state for the first time. They provide a terminus: by then the composition corresponded to the surviving painting.^[4]

Why Keep Reopening a Successful Work?

The documentary record establishes dissatisfaction more clearly than motive. The painting was praised and travelled internationally, yet Klimt returned to it repeatedly. Public approval did not give him a fixed endpoint.^[1][3]

Several visual problems were at stake. A bowed Death produced contemplation; a raised skull and club produced confrontation. A conical group organised bodies hierarchically; an oval enclosed them collectively. A closed population made Death external; the added fearful girl allowed awareness to cross the gap.

It is reasonable to see these as increasingly active relations, but no statement by Klimt defines a single programme for the repainting. Nor should the outbreak of war be treated as an automatic explanation for every darkening or threat. The largest changes occurred across years and exhibition contexts.

Revision was itself part of Klimt's practice. In this case, unusual documentary survival lets us see that practice working at monumental scale: not polishing a settled image, but replacing its emotional architecture.

Paint on the Original Frame

The Leopold Museum displays the painting with its original frame and notes traces of paint on it as evidence of revision.^[1] Those marks carry a different kind of historical information from photographs.

A reproduction records appearance at a chosen moment. Paint on a frame records physical activity at the boundary of the canvas. It suggests that alteration did not remain neatly within a removable pictorial field.

The traces should not be used to reconstruct exact colours or sequence on their own. Their importance is simpler: the surviving object bears material signs that Klimt reopened it.

Frame and canvas therefore belong to the work's biography together. The edge is not a neutral later accessory; it participated in the long act of repainting.

The Rome Exhibition of 1911

Klimt first presented the painting under the title Death at the International Art Exhibition in Rome. The Austrian pavilion gave him rooms of his own, and the work entered a setting of major public and national representation.^[1][3]

The event brought important recognition, but the exact award statement requires care. The Leopold Museum says Death and Life earned Klimt a gold medal in Rome.^[1][2] The Klimt Database's archival account says Klimt received the exhibition's only painting prize, worth 10,000 lire, but concludes that the records do not establish which of his exhibited canvases won it.^[3]

Both institutions agree that the Rome showing mattered. They differ over whether the distinction can be attached securely to this one painting. The responsible formulation is therefore that the work was central to Klimt's acclaimed Rome presentation and is traditionally credited by its museum with the award, while specialist archival research leaves the winning canvas unresolved.

The disagreement is not an obstacle to interpretation. It reveals how even famous exhibition histories can harden from a general honour into an object-specific claim.

From Death to Death and Love to Death and Life

Titles altered the balance of the allegory. Death names the solitary figure and makes the human group its object. Death and Love elevates erotic connection as the opposing force. Death and Life accommodates infancy, maternity, age, fear and intimacy together.^[1]

The sequence should not be mistaken for a simple march towards one final philosophical statement. Titles can be selected for catalogues, translated, shortened or adjusted while paint changes continue independently.

Still, the expanding language parallels the expanding composition. As Klimt added people and differentiated relations, “Life” became a more comprehensive term than “Love”. The final name acknowledges the group's plurality.

The German and English variants do not indicate separate works. Tod und Leben, Tod und Liebe, Death and Life and Death and Love belong to the same object's exhibition history.

Studies for Melancholy and Weight

The Leopold Museum holds a 1908/09 pen-and-ink study on Japanese paper of a seated female nude resting her head on her right knee. It measures 56.6 by 37.4 centimetres and is connected with the bent woman in the lower life group.^[5]

The short, searching strokes look unusually restless. The museum notes that the rare pen technique contributes to this effect. Eroticism recedes as the pose becomes heavy and melancholic.^[5]

The sheet also demonstrates the danger of treating every related drawing as an exact preparatory stage. The majority of studies explore motifs loosely associated with the life group. Klimt could test an emotional and bodily possibility without transferring its complete contour.

Such variation helps explain the final island. It did not begin as an abstract oval filled from memory. Individually observed poses were altered, overlapped and absorbed into a collective structure.

The Old Woman Who Endured Revision

A second Leopold sheet, also dated 1908/09, shows the head of an old woman in pencil on Japanese paper. The museum describes it as one of the few studies transferred almost unchanged into the 1910/11 painting and retained through the later reworking.^[6]

This persistence is revealing. Klimt transformed Death, expanded the group and revised its boundary, yet he preserved one inward face near the island's centre.

The study gives old age individual attention before pattern incorporates it. Lines around the eyes, mouth and bowed profile carry observation that a general emblem of “age” would not require.

Continuity across versions prevents the revision story becoming a tale of total destruction. Klimt repainted extensively, but he also recognised forms worth keeping.

A Public Life Across Europe

After Rome, the canvas travelled widely. It appeared in Dresden in 1912, Budapest and Mannheim in 1913, Prague in 1914, Berlin in 1916, Stockholm in 1917 and Copenhagen in the winter of 1917/18.^[1]

This exhibition sequence overlaps with its changing surface. Viewers in different cities did not necessarily see the same Death and Life. Dresden encountered the early state under Death and Love. Berlin saw an extensively altered but still intermediate image. Stockholm documented the final arrangement.^[3][4]

Public success did not end Klimt's revision. That is one of the painting's most unusual features. Recognition and dissatisfaction coexisted.

This circulation also made the allegory part of Klimt's international late reputation. Its broad human subject could travel across national settings, while the documentary photographs generated by those exhibitions now help reconstruct its development.

Price, Buyer and the Last Exhibitions

Klimt Database records an asking price of about 26,000 crowns and says the canvas was repeatedly offered for sale. It identifies Hans Böhler as the probable buyer before the Stockholm exhibition of September 1917.^[3]

“Probable” matters because the precise transaction date remains less secure than the later provenance. The Leopold Museum safely places Böhler after Klimt's estate; the database uses sale and exhibition evidence to move his involvement earlier.^[1][3]

The high price belongs to the painting's public status, but it does not explain the repainting. Klimt may have hoped to sell the work while still revising it. Commercial availability and artistic incompletion were not mutually exclusive.

Böhler's association also helps connect the exhibition record with the later ownership chain. Yet price should not dominate the allegory's reception. It is evidence that the canvas was valued and market-facing, not a measure of which state was aesthetically superior.

Provenance After Klimt

The Leopold Museum's provenance record begins with Klimt's estate in 1918 and then names Hans Böhler in Vienna after the artist's death. From 1943 the painting was placed in a wartime storage location used by the municipal collections.^[1]

Storage is not the same as ownership. The record does not identify a Nazi confiscation, and the painting should not be folded into the histories of Klimt works that were seized from Jewish collectors without object-specific evidence.

Marietta Preleuthner owned it before 1958 and until 1978. Rudolf Leopold acquired it in 1978. In 1994 it was contributed to the Leopold Museum Private Foundation, where it holds inventory number 630.^[1]

The chain is concise but important. Unlike works destroyed at Immendorf, this heavily reworked canvas survived the war. Unlike an image known only from reproduction, it still carries Klimt's final surface and the physical traces of alteration on its frame.

What Does Death and Life Mean?

The simplest reading is true but incomplete: Death threatens everyone. The skeleton's watch, the infant's vulnerability and the old woman's proximity to cool colour support that statement.

Klimt's arrangement adds complications. Life is collective; Death is solitary. The human island contains care and desire as well as fear. Most figures remain inwardly occupied, suggesting that living depends partly on not sustaining constant attention to extinction.

The open-eyed young woman introduces consciousness, but no moral lesson follows. She neither escapes nor defeats Death. Her fear is one response among sleep, love, maternity, age and melancholy.

The painting also refuses an easy triumph of Life. Warm colour and abundance do not eliminate the club. Nor does Death possess the group. The gap remains open, holding threat and continuation in permanent relation.

Artist Up Close

Begin with the interval. The unpainted-looking visual space between the two groups is as active as any body. It prevents touch and makes looking possible.

Then compare the two open gazes. Death's skull looks right. The late-added girl looks left. Their sightline crosses the gap while the rest of the human island curls inward.

Finally, follow pattern. Crosses repeat with severe regularity on Death. Life's textiles change colour, scale and motif as they move through different bodies. Klimt opposed one end to many living forms without giving either side a purely naturalistic surface.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Accessed August 2026.

1. Leopold Museum, Vienna, “Death and Life,” object data, current display, dimensions, title sequence, first/final description, date conventions, frame evidence, exhibitions and provenance. View source.
2. Leopold Museum, Vienna, “Contemporary Reproduction of Gustav Klimt's Painting Death and Life, 1st Version,” Moriz Nähr photograph, first-state evidence, nine-person final count and major changes. View source.
3. Gustav Klimt Database, “Expressive Blaze of Colors,” composition, colour interpretation, first-state documentation, 1912/13 revision, late additions, exhibition history and uncertainty over the Rome prize-winning painting. View source.
4. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Final Years,” Schiele's 1915 repainting report, Berlin intermediate state, 1916/17 convention and Stockholm documentation of the final state. View source.
5. Leopold Museum, Vienna, “Seated Female Nude, Her Head Resting on Her Right Knee. Study for Death and Life,” 1908/09 date, pen technique, dimensions, melancholy and loose/direct study relationships. View source.
6. Leopold Museum, Vienna, “Head of an Old Woman. Study for Death and Life,” 1908/09 pencil study, dimensions and unusually close survival of the motif through both painted states. View source.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

The Three Ages of Woman

Water Serpents I

Pallas Athene