The Three Ages of Woman

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About The Three Ages of Woman

A sleeping infant rests against a young mother's breast. Her eyes are closed, her head inclined and her arms gathered around the small body. Beside them stands an old woman in profile. She bows her head and covers her face with hair and one hand, but her ageing body remains exposed.

Gustav Klimt called these figures The Three Ages. The title is simple; the relationships are not. Childhood and maternity form an intimate enclosure. Old age shares the same painted field but stands apart, physically near and psychologically withdrawn. The three bodies belong together as an allegory of time while experiencing that time in radically different ways.

Klimt painted the work in 1905. He did not place the figures in a room, garden or continuous landscape. Naturalistically observed flesh meets flattened ornament, open colour and patterned zones. The changing female body becomes the clock. No written narrative tells the viewer what happens next, and no named portrait identities are required.^[1][2][3]

The painting is now in Italy's National Gallery of Modern and Contemporary Art in Rome. Its current object title is Le tre età, literally The Three Ages. The fuller English title The Three Ages of Woman describes its female life stages without identifying a different canvas.^[1][2]

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• Current Italian titleLe tre età (The Three Ages)^[1]
• Established fuller titleThe Three Ages of Woman
• Alternative catalogue wordingLe tre età, Tre figure femminili (The Three Ages, Three Female Figures)^[2]
• Date1905^[1][2][3]
• MediumOil on canvas in the current GNAMC object record^[1]
• Dimensions171 × 171 centimetres^[1]
• CollectionGalleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Rome
• Inventory number951^[1][2]
• FiguresA sleeping infant, a young mother and an elderly woman
• Principal subjectInfancy, maternity/adulthood and old age embodied as female life stages
• Preparatory periodIndividual and grouped studies from 1904–05, including infant, mother-and-child and elderly-nude sheets^[3][5][6][7]
• First public exhibitionSecond exhibition of the Deutscher Künstlerbund, Berlin, May 1905^[3]
• Italian acquisitionBought for the Galleria Nazionale in 1911; sources differ over its relation to the Rome International Art Exhibition^[2][4][9]
• August 2026 display noteTemporarily lent to Palazzo Bonaparte through 23 August 2026, according to GNAMC's current notice^[9]

Annotated Details from The Three Ages of Woman

The painting depends on contact and separation: infant, mother and elderly woman occupy one allegory but not one emotional space.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Details from THE THREE AGES OF WOMAN

These close views use the high-resolution public-domain source while keeping annotation markers in CSS rather than in the image file.

1

Mother and child

The mother encloses the infant, making touch the centre of the youthful group.

2

Infant

The infant belongs to a visible relation, not to a named family portrait.

3

Old age

The elderly body is exposed, isolated and given its own weight within the square.

4

Gap

The gap between figures is as important as the grouping itself.

5

Monumental field

The square field makes the three stages read as an allegorical structure.

6

Hair and concealment

Hair covers and frames bodies differently, sharpening the contrast between exposure and protection.

7

Square format

The square format makes the allegory feel compressed and monumental rather than episodic.

Three Bodies in One Square

The canvas is almost exactly square. Within it, the figures rise vertically but do not fill the whole surface evenly. The mother and child create one rounded unit; the old woman creates another, thinner contour. Pattern surrounds and separates them.^[1]

Klimt did not arrange the ages in a horizontal sequence from infant to adult to elder. They stand together. Time is condensed rather than narrated. The child does not look towards the mother it may become, and the mother does not visibly look towards the older body as a future self.

This simultaneity is the painting's first disturbance. We see three stages at once, but the figures do not share our overview. Their closed eyes, bowed heads and inward gestures make each age absorbed in its own condition.

The square format strengthens the sense of an emblem. Yet the bodies resist becoming tidy symbols. The baby's weight, the mother's curved hold and the old woman's altered flesh insist on physical difference.

Monumental, but Not a Mural

At 171 centimetres in both directions, the canvas is large enough for the adult figures to approach the spectator's bodily scale.^[1] Klimt was not making a small philosophical illustration. He made age confront viewers through the presence of painted flesh.

The work remains an easel painting rather than an architectural commission. It does not inherit a university programme, a patron's dining room or a fixed ceiling position. Its square field travels as an independent object.

That independence helps explain the abstract setting. Klimt did not need to accommodate a doorway, frieze sequence or official emblem. He could concentrate the three bodies within a self-contained surface and let ornament supply their environment.

Scale also changes the elderly figure's effect. She cannot be overlooked as a small warning beside a beautiful central subject. Her body rises through much of the canvas and occupies the viewer's space with the mother. Equality of size does not produce equality of comfort, but it prevents age becoming a footnote.

The Sleeping Infant

The infant is the smallest figure and the most completely dependent. Its eyes are closed; its limbs draw in towards the mother's body. It does not occupy a separate cradle or symbolic pedestal. The adult torso and arms provide its shelter.

Sleep gives childhood a state before self-consciousness. The baby does not recognise time, ageing or the viewer. Its position is secure only because another body holds it.

The child's scale matters to the group. It allows the mother's arms to close around both bodies, creating a compact rhythm of curves. Head, shoulder, forearm and small limbs form an intimate knot within the larger composition.

It would be easy to treat the infant simply as “the future”. The visible relation is more immediate. It is vulnerable life receiving warmth and support. Any symbolic future is carried through present physical dependence.

The Young Mother

The mother stands or hovers frontally, her pale torso exposed and her face inclined towards the child. Her eyes remain shut. One arm rises around the infant while the other helps secure the body against her breast.^[3]

Her nudity does not produce the same effect as the old woman's. Smooth modelling, youth and maternal contact allow viewers to recognise an inherited ideal of beauty. Yet Klimt does not turn her into a remote goddess. The weight she holds and the downward inclination of her head make care bodily.

She is also psychologically unavailable. Closed eyes prevent a direct encounter with the viewer. Maternity is shown as inward concentration rather than public display.

The figure's outline is softened by ornament. Patterned colour gathers around her hair, shoulders and lower body until flesh and decorative field meet. Klimt preserves the naturalistic torso while flattening much of its environment.

An Intimate Enclosure

Mother and child form the painting's tightest bond. Their heads approach one another, their skin touches and their bodies share a common surrounding shape. The child is not merely placed beside a personification of adulthood; infancy is physically contained by maternity.

The arrangement can recall images of the Madonna and Child, but the resemblance has limits. There is no halo, throne or secure sacred setting. The old naked woman stands immediately beside the group, making ageing rather than salvation the principal horizon.

Nor is maternal tenderness offered as a complete account of womanhood. The title demands that the viewer also consider a body no longer protected by youthful beauty or by the culturally admired role of mother.

The enclosure is therefore both comforting and selective. The young pair can seem to inhabit a private field from which the elderly figure has been excluded. Their closeness intensifies her separation.

The Elderly Woman

The old woman turns in profile. Her head bows; long hair falls across her face; one raised hand adds another partial screen. She avoids the outward gaze that might invite recognition, but the rest of her body remains presented with unusual candour.^[2][3]

Klimt records the physical marks of age: lowered breasts, a rounded or slackened abdomen, prominent joints, thinner limbs and changing skin. These are not signs of a specific illness. They make duration visible on the body.

Her posture carries emotional weight. Covering the face can suggest grief, shame, fatigue, inwardness or refusal. No institutional record establishes one feeling as definitive. The bowed head is visible; its private thought is not.

Ageing has often been allegorised through an external attribute—a staff, hourglass, skull or winter landscape. Klimt needs none of these. The woman's anatomy and gesture bear time directly.

Exposed Body, Covered Face

The old woman's gesture produces a paradox. The part through which identity and emotion are usually recognised is concealed. The body that social convention often asks art to conceal is exposed.

This reversal shapes the viewer's discomfort. We cannot meet her eyes, ask consent through returned attention or soften the encounter with a smile. We are left before a body whose vulnerability is visible while its personhood withdraws behind hair and hand.

It would be wrong to call the figure merely grotesque because some contemporary critics did. Klimt's observation is unsparing, but it is not caricature. The body's unevenness, weight and bone are rendered as facts within the same allegorical field as infant softness and maternal beauty.

The figure also resists sentimental dignity. Klimt does not idealise age into serene wisdom. He allows grief or self-concealment to remain. The painting's seriousness depends on granting old age a condition that is neither comic nor consoling.

Contact and Separation

All three figures stand close enough to read as one group. Their contours nearly meet, and ornamental fields help bind the composition. Yet contact is distributed unequally.

The infant touches the mother extensively. The mother's arms organise that connection. The old woman appears adjacent rather than embraced. She belongs to the sequence but not to the intimate circuit.

This physical arrangement can support several readings. It may show the solitude of age, the young pair's unawareness of time or the fact that each stage is lived from within. None requires the figures to be a literal grandmother, daughter and grandchild.

The absence of obvious exchange is as important as proximity. No hand reaches from youth to age. No open eye recognises the neighbouring body. Klimt made continuity visible through grouping and discontinuity visible through gesture.

Three Kinds of Inwardness

Every figure turns away from direct visual engagement. The infant sleeps. The mother closes her eyes and inclines towards the child. The elderly woman hides her face.

These are not identical states. The baby lacks awareness; the mother concentrates on care; the older figure actively or instinctively covers herself. Klimt gives time a psychological dimension by varying how consciousness appears.

The viewer, by contrast, sees all three. We possess the temporal overview the figures lack. The painting therefore turns looking into knowledge: to understand the title is to recognise that the young body and the old body belong to one continuum.

That recognition can be tender or unsettling. Klimt does not direct it through an explanatory inscription. Closed eyes preserve silence.

Flesh and Ornament

The figures are modelled with enough tonal variation to feel bodily. Around them, depth collapses. Coloured and patterned fields press towards the picture surface rather than opening into a believable room.^[3]

This contrast was central to Klimt's work in the mid-1900s. Naturalistic faces and flesh could coexist with ornament that behaved like textile, mosaic or abstract design. The body remained tangible while the setting became a visual field.

In The Three Ages, pattern does not merely beautify the young figures. It separates regions, closes spaces and changes the visual temperature around each body. Organic curls, discs, small flowers and darker zones create differing envelopes.

Individual motifs should be described before they are translated. A circle may suggest recurrence, fertility or decoration; a flower may suggest growth or simply provide colour. The painting contains no surviving key that assigns a single meaning to every mark.

What Is the Painting Made Of?

GNAMC's current object record lists the medium as oil on canvas.^[1] That is the most stable public description. A 2019 museum report about conservation work uses the broader phrase “mixed media on canvas”.^[10]

The difference does not justify an improvised materials list. In particular, the glinting or gold-coloured parts should not automatically be called gold leaf. Paint can imitate metallic brilliance, and “mixed media” does not identify a particular metal.

Until a detailed technical report specifies binders and additions, oil on canvas is the responsible baseline. The museum's wider conservation wording can be acknowledged without pretending that it resolves every bright surface.

This caution improves looking. Material splendour in Klimt is not always produced by the same technique. A viewer can attend to luminous colour, reflective effect and ornamental density without assigning substances that the accessible object record does not name.

A Vanitas Without a Skull

The Klimt Database places The Three Ages within the tradition of vanitas: images that remind viewers of transience and death.^[3] The Italian cultural-property record likewise interprets the three female stages as the passage of time.^[2]

Klimt's version is unusual because the warning is carried by bodies rather than by a collection of symbolic objects. There is no need for a clock, extinguished candle or decaying fruit. Infancy, maturity and age appear simultaneously.

The Italian record notes the absence of a skull and describes the gaunt, sorrowing old body as taking over its function.^[2] This is an interpretive comparison, not evidence that Klimt painted and removed a skull from the canvas.

“Vanitas” therefore names a tradition, not a complete solution. The painting does not declare youth vain in the narrow sense of moral pride. It makes beauty temporary by placing it beside a body transformed by time.

Time Is Not a Straight Line

Although the title names stages, the composition refuses the form of a diagram. There are no arrows, steps or receding distances. The three ages share one plane.

This creates temporal compression. The infant and old woman can be seen as the beginning and end of one life, yet the painting gives no narrative identity that makes them literally the same person. They are particular bodies and general conditions at once.

The mother occupies the centre conceptually but not as a neutral midpoint. Maternity makes adulthood relational. Her age is defined through the child she holds, while old age is defined through a body that stands alone.

The imbalance may expose cultural expectations as much as biological change. Youthful womanhood appears through beauty and care; old age appears through exposure and grief. The painting presents these codes powerfully without proving that Klimt endorsed every hierarchy they contain.

Why All Three Ages Are Female

Klimt could have represented “the ages of humanity” through a male sequence or a mixed group. Instead, the current title and composition define time through infancy, a young mother's body and an old woman.^[1][2]

This choice makes reproduction and care central to adulthood. It also narrows the allegory: a woman's middle stage appears through maternity, although not every adult woman is a mother. The painting's symbolic economy should not be mistaken for a complete social definition of female life.

The old figure intensifies that problem. She is no longer presented through fertility or erotic ideal, and no profession, possession or family role replaces them. Her body alone identifies the stage.

Klimt exposes the cultural structure as he uses it. Youth and maternity receive closeness, colour and protection; age receives solitude and unsoftened observation. Viewers can recognise the force of that structure while asking why the stages are valued so unequally.

Studying the Infant

Klimt prepared the work through repeated observation. A 1904 Wien Museum sheet contains three studies of seated nude infants. It is pencil on packing paper and measures 34.9 by 55 centimetres.^[7]

Multiple poses on one sheet show inquiry rather than illustration. Klimt tested how a baby's limbs fold, how a large head balances above a small torso and how sitting weight changes the contour.

Another 1904 sheet records two seated child nudes, again linked by the museum to The Three Ages. Such studies do not reproduce the final sleeping infant exactly; they expand the range of observed possibilities.^[3][7]

The drawings keep the baby's body from becoming a generic emblem of innocence. Before the figure entered a patterned allegory, Klimt attended to proportion, curl and dependence.

Studying Mother and Child

The Wien Museum holds a 1904–05 chalk drawing on packing paper showing a mother with a baby or young child. At 45.8 by 31.5 centimetres, the sheet concentrates on bodily relation rather than surrounding ornament.^[6]

Klimt explored the contact points that make care legible: the adult's arms, the angle of the small body and the way two heads approach. The final painting transforms these observations into a larger frontal group.

Klimt Database also describes rapid sheets containing several mother-and-child variants.^[3] Repetition allowed him to distinguish a natural hold from a symbolic silhouette.

The study relation remains specific but not mechanical. A drawing can contribute weight, gesture and emotional proximity without fixing the final orientation or pattern.

Studying Old Age

A 1904–05 Wien Museum sheet shows an elderly female nude in left profile. Klimt used blue pencil on packing paper; the sheet measures 44.7 by 31.7 centimetres and is catalogued as a study for The Three Ages.^[5]

The medium isolates contour and bodily change. Without colour or ornament, the line has to describe the descending breast, torso, hip and altered stance. Observation precedes allegorical placement.

Another Wien Museum drawing, dated around 1905, shows an old woman in profile with her head against folded hands. The museum associates that sheet with both The Three Ages and the Faculty Painting Medicine.^[8]

The dual association is a useful warning. Klimt's studies could serve recurring problems of age, grief and bodily exposure. Catalogue links are scholarly judgements, not labels written by the artist for every sheet.

The Transfer Sketch and Reversal

A 1904 transfer sketch in a private collection records an important compositional difference. In it, mother and child face towards the old woman. The figures overlap more closely, and the mother's inclination strengthens contact across the age boundary.^[3]

In the painted work, the young group turns the other way. Klimt Database proposes that tracing paper helped him reverse this arrangement.^[3] The hypothesis is grounded in the relationship between sketch and canvas, but it does not make the whole painting a mechanically transferred image.

Reversal changed meaning as well as direction. By turning the mother and child away, Klimt weakened their exchange with old age and increased the older figure's isolation. A technical operation became a psychological one.

The sketch is therefore valuable precisely because it preserves an alternative. It shows that the final separation was not inevitable from the first design.

Did Klimt's Mother Pose?

The Klimt Database notes that Klimt made studies of his seated elderly mother, Anna Klimt, during this period and says she may have posed for the old-age figure.^[3]

The cautious verb must remain. Similarity of age, timing and studio access can support a model proposal; it does not turn the painted allegory into a portrait with a documented sitting history.

Even if Anna contributed a pose, the final woman belongs to an invented composition. Klimt altered contour, gesture, scale and setting. A model's body can inform a personification without supplying its complete identity or meaning.

The proposal also cannot make the painting a coded statement about Klimt's private feelings towards his mother. No surviving source provides that biographical key.

From Separate Studies to a Shared Field

The surviving drawings concentrate on one problem at a time: an infant turning or sitting, a mother supporting a child, an elderly torso in profile. Their paper grounds contain little of the canvas's elaborate surrounding pattern.^[5][6][7]

This separation reveals two stages of invention. Drawing let Klimt examine pose, weight and contact through line. Painting required him to decide how independently observed bodies would coexist inside a flattened ornamental whole.

The final image does not erase the studies' specificity. The baby's compact limbs, the mother's supporting arms and the old woman's altered contour remain distinct. Ornament joins them without making their anatomy interchangeable.

Nor does the process prove that every painted figure had one definitive model. Several studies could contribute to a single contour, and one sheet could be associated with more than one composition. The artwork emerged through selection and rearrangement rather than the enlargement of three fixed portraits.

Berlin, May 1905

Klimt first showed The Three Ages at the second exhibition of the Deutscher Künstlerbund in Berlin. He and Ferdinand Hodler were the only artists given rooms of their own, and Klimt's room contained thirteen paintings.^[3]

The presentation had practical difficulties. Decorative work on the room took longer than expected, and customs problems delayed the paintings. The public gained access after the broader exhibition had begun.^[3]

These details matter because the work's debut was not an isolated unveiling. It appeared within a substantial presentation of Klimt's art, alongside Water Snakes II and the portrait of Margarethe Stonborough-Wittgenstein. Viewers encountered different ways of painting women within the same room.

The painting occupied a conspicuous main-wall position. Its size, square format and exposed bodies made it difficult to treat as a minor allegory.

The Reception of the Elderly Nude

Contemporary reporting acknowledged Klimt's skill while describing visitors' discomfort. One review attacked the old woman's “repulsive realism” and treated her aged body as a provocation.^[3]

The phrase reveals more about decorum than anatomy. Art audiences were accustomed to idealised female nudity associated with youth, mythology or beauty. Klimt applied sustained observation to a body outside those conventions.

The infant and mother were also nude, but the old woman drew particular hostility. Age changed the cultural acceptability of exposure. The review therefore documents a gendered boundary: the female body was welcomed as an ideal and resisted as evidence of time.

Klimt's response is not recorded as a manifesto. The painting itself supplies the counterargument by giving old age equal scale and unavoidable proximity. The viewer cannot enjoy youthful maternity without also confronting the body beside it.

Venice in 1910

The painting was shown at the Venice Biennale in 1910 as part of a large presentation of Klimt's work.^[9] Italy was already an important setting for his international reputation, and the canvas's subsequent acquisition secured that connection.

The Venice exhibition should not be confused with the Rome International Art Exhibition of the following year. They were separate events with different catalogues and installation histories.

Venice established the painting's public presence in Italy before the purchase. It did not itself transfer ownership to the Roman gallery.

Keeping the exhibitions separate prevents a familiar but inaccurate compression in which every Italian event becomes “Rome 1911”.

The 1911 Acquisition and the Rome Problem

The secure fact is that the Italian state acquired The Three Ages for the Galleria Nazionale in 1911. GNAMC describes the purchase as following the Rome International Exhibition.^[9] The Italian cultural-property record says the canvas does not appear among the displayed works but may have been bought with funds associated with that event.^[2]

Klimt Database offers a more precise archival caution. A Galerie Miethke card first connected the work with the Rome sale and was then corrected to say it had been sold directly by the artist. The painting is absent from the exhibition catalogue and has not been identified in installation photographs. It therefore seems to have entered the gallery before the exhibition rather than hanging in the Austrian pavilion.^[4]

These accounts agree on buyer, year and destination. They differ over how closely the transaction should be described as an exhibition purchase.

The distinction also protects another object history. Klimt did receive Rome's important painting prize, but The Three Ages was probably not among the displayed canvases to which that jury could respond.^[4]

An Austrian Painting in an Italian National Collection

Acquisition by the Galleria Nazionale made The Three Ages part of Italy's public account of modern European art. It received inventory number 951 and remains one of the institution's recognised masterpieces.^[1][2]

The painting's Italian title history reflects that setting. The current object page uses the concise Le tre età. The national catalogue also records fuller variants equivalent to The Three Ages of Woman and The Three Ages of Life.^[1][2]

These are title variants, not evidence of repainting. Unlike Death and Life, this canvas does not have a documented sequence of major later states. The object shown today is the 1905 painting, subject to normal conservation and exhibition history.

Its public ownership also distinguishes it from Klimt works that disappeared into private collections or were destroyed in 1945. The Rome canvas survives as a directly inspectable surface rather than a photographic reconstruction.

Where Is It in August 2026?

GNAMC owns the painting, but ownership and temporary display are different facts. A museum notice dated July 2026 states that Le tre età is on loan to Palazzo Bonaparte through 23 August 2026.^[9]

The loan is temporary. It should not be converted into a new permanent location or a transfer of ownership. After the announced period, visitors should consult GNAMC's current information before planning a visit.

This dated qualification matters for a frequently travelling masterpiece. A collection label can remain stable while the object itself moves for exhibitions, conservation or installation changes.

As of 9 August 2026, the accurate statement is therefore two-part: the canvas belongs to GNAMC, and it is temporarily displayed at Palazzo Bonaparte.

The Three Ages and Death and Life

Klimt later returned to infancy, adult intimacy and old age in Death and Life, but the two paintings organise time differently. The 1905 canvas isolates three female stages. The later work builds a nine-person island watched by an external skeleton.

In The Three Ages, mortality is carried by the changing body. In Death and Life, it also receives a separate personification. The earlier figures close their eyes or hide the face; the later painting adds an open-eyed young woman who recognises the threat.

The comparison clarifies each work without making one a preliminary version of the other. The Three Ages has its own scale, study history, exhibition reception and Italian object life.

Its narrower structure can be more severe. There is no crowd to absorb old age and no named Death to blame. Time acts through the bodies themselves.

What Does The Three Ages of Woman Mean?

The painting gives no single moral sentence. It joins tenderness and estrangement, beauty and bodily change, protection and isolation.

Infancy is held. Maternity holds. Old age stands alone. That progression can seem pessimistic, but the old woman is not expelled from the composition. Her body completes the title and makes the young group's meaning possible.

Closed eyes further complicate the allegory. None of the figures surveys the whole cycle. The knowledge of continuity belongs to the viewer, who must recognise relation where the bodies show little mutual awareness.

Klimt's most radical choice may be the simplest: he makes ageing visible at the same scale and with the same seriousness as maternal youth. The work does not ask us to prefer one body. It asks us to understand that time inhabits both.

Artist Up Close

Start with the hands. The mother's hands secure the child. The elderly woman's hand covers her face. One gesture sustains contact; the other creates withdrawal.

Then compare the eyes. Sleep, inward tenderness and self-concealment prevent any figure from meeting the viewer. Their common inwardness contains three different relationships to consciousness.

Finally, trace the outer contours. Mother and child produce a rounded shared shape. The old woman forms a narrower, broken vertical. Klimt's allegory is built not only from three bodies but from the unequal spaces between them.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Accessed August 2026.

1. Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Rome, “Le tre età,” current object title, 1905 date, inventory 951, oil-on-canvas medium and 171 × 171 cm dimensions. View source.
2. Italian Ministry of Culture, ArCo catalogue, “Le tre età, Tre figure femminili,” title variants, inventory, Berlin history, 1911 acquisition context and interpretation of the three stages and skull-free vanitas. View source.
3. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Klimt Affair Surrounding the Faculty Paintings,” composition, vanitas context, 1904–05 studies, transfer/reversal proposal, possible maternal model, Berlin debut and contemporary reception. View source.
4. Gustav Klimt Database, “Expressive Blaze of Colors,” Galerie Miethke record, direct-sale correction, absence from the Rome catalogue and photographs, GNAMC acquisition and Rome-prize context. View source.
5. Wien Museum, “Nude Depiction of an Elderly Woman in Profile to the Left,” 1904–05 date, blue-pencil medium, dimensions and catalogue association with The Three Ages. View source.
6. Wien Museum, “Study of a Mother with Child,” 1904–05 chalk drawing, dimensions and catalogue relationship. View source.
7. Wien Museum, “Three Studies of Seated Child Nudes,” 1904 pencil drawing, dimensions and catalogue relationship. View source.
8. Wien Museum, “Nude Depiction of an Old Woman in Profile to the Left, Head Resting on Folded Hands,” circa-1905 drawing and dual catalogue association with The Three Ages and Medicine. View source.
9. Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Rome, “Le tre età by Klimt on loan to Palazzo Bonaparte until 23 August,” Berlin and Venice exhibition history, 1911 Italian purchase and dated August 2026 loan status. View source.
10. Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Rome, 2019 Annual Report, conservation reference describing Le tre età as mixed media on canvas. View source.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Death and Life

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

Water Serpents I

Pallas Athene