Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein

Gustav Klimt's portrait of Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein is a picture of poise held inside instability. The sitter stands almost life-size, her face and hands precisely present while a pale dress widens towards the foot of an unusually narrow canvas. A stole loops around her arms, exposing the shoulders and turning the body's outline into a sequence of openings, crossings and falls. Behind her, coloured zones suggest walls, screens or architectural divisions without settling into a room that could be entered.

The painting also preserves change. Klimt signed and dated it 1905, and that is the date used by the Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen. Yet it appeared at a Berlin exhibition in May of that year while still unfinished. A photograph records that earlier state; correspondence shows Klimt intended further work; comparison with the surviving canvas identifies important alterations to the background. Current Klimt Database research considers it likely that the portrait reached its completed form in 1906.^[1][2][3]

This is therefore one canvas with a documented working history, not a 1905 portrait and a separate 1906 version. It is also an oil painting rather than a textile or metal-leaf construction. The dress, stole, original frame and painted surface belong to connected fields of Viennese design, but each has its own material and authorship. Keeping those distinctions clear reveals how deliberately Klimt coordinated figure, fashion, furniture-scale format and abstracted environment.

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• Collection titleMargaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein
• Date on the object record1905
• Probable completion1906, after further work following the 1905 Berlin exhibition
• MediumOil on canvas
• Dimensions179.8 × 90.5 centimetres
• Inventory number13074
• CommissionersKarl and Leopoldine Wittgenstein
• Preparatory evidenceApproximately thirty surviving studies; work on the group began in 1904
• First public presentationSecond Exhibition of the Deutscher Künstlerbund, Berlin, May 1905, in an unfinished state
• FrameOriginal 1905 frame; designed by Josef Hoffmann and executed by the Wiener Werkstätte according to Klimt Database research
• Current collectionBayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, Neue Pinakothek, Munich
• AcquisitionPurchased from private ownership in 1960
• Current accessDisplayed in Room I on the ground floor of the Alte Pinakothek while the Neue Pinakothek is closed for renovation, as recorded on 9 August 2026^[1][2][8]

Margaret, Margarethe or Margareta?

The collection title uses Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein. German-language historical records often call the sitter Margarethe or Margarete Wittgenstein, while family usage included Gretl. These are naming layers around one person, not competing model identifications.

She was born Margarethe Wittgenstein in Vienna on 19 September 1882. After marrying Jerome Stonborough on 7 January 1905, she sometimes preferred the English form Margaret. That choice suited a marriage linking Vienna to an American husband and a household soon established in Berlin. The anglicised name did not erase her Wittgenstein identity; the double surname now familiar in the painting's title preserves both family histories.^[2][6]

An error in a contemporary Berlin report needs particular care. The writer observed that the portrayed Viennese woman had married an Englishman. Jerome Stonborough was American. The report remains valuable evidence that Margaret attended the exhibition and attracted public attention, but its mistaken nationality should not be inherited as biography.^[2][3]

The portrait is also encountered as Portrait of Margarethe Stonborough-Wittgenstein or Portrait of Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein. Neither wording describes another canvas. The Munich collection's shorter title is the safest object label; the longer forms explain the genre and help connect older catalogues.

The Exact Object

The Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen records an oil painting on canvas measuring 179.8 by 90.5 centimetres. Klimt's signature and the date 1905 appear within a small square device at the lower left. The picture's extreme verticality lets the standing figure approach life size while denying her the broad lateral room available in a conventional full-length society portrait.^[1][3]

No current collection record identifies gold leaf, silver leaf, brass, textile attachment or another applied substance on the canvas. Gold-coloured details, including the signet-like signature field, should be described as painted effects unless technical evidence establishes otherwise. Klimt was moving towards the material brilliance associated with his Golden Period, but that broader development cannot supply a medium that this object record does not name.

The physical frame is separately catalogued as the original frame for inventory 13074 and is dated 1905. Klimt Database research attributes its design to Josef Hoffmann and its execution to the Wiener Werkstätte. Those roles matter: Klimt painted the canvas; Hoffmann devised the surrounding design; specialist makers realised the frame. Its precise materials should not be guessed from other Wiener Werkstätte objects.^[1][2]

Seen together, canvas and frame make the portrait an object designed for an interior rather than a floating reproduction. Yet the frame is not proof that the painted background depicts a specific room. Klimt created a self-contained spatial system inside the boundary that Hoffmann's design completed from outside.

Who Was Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein?

Margaret was the youngest daughter of industrialist Karl Wittgenstein and Leopoldine Kalmus Wittgenstein. The family belonged among the wealthiest in the Habsburg monarchy, but wealth alone does not explain the portrait. Music, visual art and architectural design were sustained parts of Wittgenstein family life. Karl supported the Vienna Secession, bought modern art and became a significant client of the Wiener Werkstätte. Hermine, Margaret's elder sister, advised him on collecting and helped direct that patronage towards Viennese modernism.^[2]

It is tempting to define Margaret solely through famous male relatives: Karl's daughter, pianist Paul Wittgenstein's sister, philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein's sister, or Jerome Stonborough's wife. The portrait emerged from a family commission, but her later life demonstrates independent cultural judgment. She collected French modern art with Jerome, supported artists and institutions, commissioned ambitious domestic architecture and maintained extensive intellectual relationships. Her surviving papers include diaries, notes and hundreds of letters, evidence of a reflective life far beyond the silent role of a model.^[2][6]

Her position within design culture was active as well as inherited. In 1905, Margaret and Jerome commissioned the Wiener Werkstätte to furnish their Berlin apartment. Two decades later she initiated the house now known as Haus Wittgenstein in Vienna, first working with Paul Engelmann before Ludwig decisively intervened in the design. These later projects should not be read backwards as secret explanations of every rectangle in Klimt's background. They do show that the woman painted in 1904–06 would continue to make consequential choices about artists, objects and spaces.^[2]

A Family Commission in 1904

Karl and Leopoldine Wittgenstein commissioned Klimt to paint their youngest daughter. The engagement to Jerome had been announced in 1903, and the portrait has often been connected with that transition. Klimt Database places the commission probably in early 1904 and preserves correspondence in which the artist accepted Leopoldine's request while asking to delay substantial work until around the middle of March.^[2][3]

That evidence establishes parents, artist and a broad starting period. It does not turn the canvas into a wedding-day commission fixed by a surviving contract, nor does it prove that Margaret herself chose every term. The marriage occurred in January 1905, while work was already under way. Calling it a bridal portrait can be useful as social context, provided the phrase does not imply a bridal costume, a documented ceremonial display or completion before the wedding.

Karl's earlier relationship with Klimt made the choice intelligible. In 1903 he had acquired The Golden Knight (Life Is a Battle), which hung in the Palais Wittgenstein. His support of the Secession and the Wiener Werkstätte also placed the portrait within a wider patronage network. The commission joined painting to a family environment already shaped by new art; it was not an isolated purchase prompted only by a daughter becoming marriageable.^[2]

Approximately Thirty Preparatory Studies

The painted figure's apparent stillness was achieved through extensive drawing. The Leopold Museum associates the portrait with approximately thirty surviving studies and notes that correspondence places the beginning of the series in 1904. “Approximately” is essential: it describes a scholarly group rather than a final lifetime total, and catalogue associations may be refined as sheets are re-examined.^[4]

The studies concentrate on pose, garment and the relation between arms and stole. Klimt tried ways of containing the body within a narrow upright field before the coloured background existed. Drawing enabled him to alter the direction of the head, distribution of fabric and degree to which the shawl covered the shoulders. It did not provide a miniature blueprint of the final canvas.

One especially informative sheet is the Leopold Museum's Standing Lady from the Right, Her Hands Covered by Her Shawl. Dated 1904, it is black chalk on Japanese paper, measures 55.2 by 34.9 centimetres and has inventory number 1352. The figure is laterally reversed in relation to the painting. Her dress already broadens downward, and the wrap forms a strong patterned enclosure, but it covers more of the shoulders than in the final image. Her gaze also meets the viewer more directly than the painted Margaret's distant look.^[4]

Those differences are not failures of resemblance. They show drawing functioning as a field of alternatives. Reversal tests the composition's balance. Additional coverage changes the proportions of bare skin and cloth. A direct glance establishes a different social relation from the final averted gaze. Klimt could keep the broad silhouette while revising the sitter's address.

An Albertina sheet catalogued as Study for the Portrait of Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein: Standing from the Front with a Slight Turn to the Left provides another exact point within the group. Dated 1904, the black-chalk drawing on paper measures 55 by 35 centimetres and has inventory number 29842. It belongs to the same preparatory field without proving that every extant standing woman from the period represents Margaret.^[5]

The group also marks a shift in Klimt's graphic practice. The Leopold Museum notes his initial use here of black chalk on Japanese paper, before the increasingly fine pencil line that would characterise many later drawings. Material terms must remain attached to the paper works: black chalk, pencil and Japanese paper do not describe the oil canvas. What passes from sheet to painting is an investigated relation among posture, garment and contour, not the physical substance of the sketch.^[4][5]

Berlin, May 1905: An Unfinished Public State

Klimt requested the portrait from Karl Wittgenstein for the second exhibition of the Deutscher Künstlerbund in Berlin. His correspondence explicitly acknowledged that it was not finished. The show opened in May 1905, and the portrait appeared in a room devoted to Klimt alongside works including The Three Ages of Woman. A photograph published in Kunst und Künstler records how the canvas looked at that stage.^[2][3]

This is unusually valuable evidence. “Unfinished” does not depend on a modern viewer deciding that a passage looks sketchy; it comes from Klimt's own request and is supported by a dated photograph. Nor is the photograph a second version. It is a monochrome witness to one painting during its development. Its strengths are structural: it can show the placement of divisions and ornaments. It cannot establish every historic colour or surface effect.

Margaret attended the exhibition, giving reviewers the rare opportunity to compare portrait and sitter in the same space. The Neue Freie Presse admired the slender young woman in the picture and remarked on the attention produced by her presence. The report's description tells us how the portrait registered publicly: elongated, recognisable and socially immediate even before Klimt considered it complete. It does not tell us whether Margaret agreed with the critic, admired the canvas, or silently rejected it.^[2][3]

Klimt's room was itself a significant exhibition setting. While most rooms were plain, his was specially decorated, and delays meant it was not ready for the press preview on 18 May but was finished for the official opening the next day. The portrait therefore entered public life as part of a deliberately staged presentation. That context should not be confused with the painted setting inside the canvas or with the work's future domestic installation.^[3]

What Klimt Changed after Berlin

During the exhibition Klimt told Karl that the problem was not simply that the picture remained incomplete: he did not yet consider it good enough. He intended to continue after the show. The distinction is revealing. Completion involved qualitative judgment, not merely filling blank canvas according to a predetermined plan.^[2][3]

Comparison between the Berlin photograph and the surviving painting locates the most evident changes in the background. Klimt introduced a dark horizontal divider with small checkerboard accents in the lower portion and added ornament in the field behind Margaret's head. He also placed his signature and 1905 date at lower left within the square signet-like field.^[3]

These modifications strengthen the architecture of the surface. The horizontal divider checks the uninterrupted upward pull of the figure, while the patterned area around the head concentrates the upper zone. Small squares echo the larger rectangular organisation without turning the background into a literal tiled wall. The additions make the sitter's placement more exact even as the setting becomes less conventionally representational.

Current research considers the portrait likely completed in 1906, when it was installed in the Palais Wittgenstein. This does not invalidate the signed date. “1905” records Klimt's inscription and the year of first exhibition; “completed probably in 1906” describes the best reconstruction of subsequent work. A responsible account needs both.^[1][2][3]

A Narrow Full-Length Portrait

The format is the first source of the picture's tension. At nearly 180 centimetres high but only about 90 centimetres wide, the canvas gives Margaret the scale of a bodily encounter while compressing her laterally. The dress expands towards the base, yet the figure never acquires a broad platform. She seems both monumental and precariously contained.^[1]

Traditional full-length portraits often use furniture, columns, curtains or landscape to declare a sitter's status. Klimt keeps the prestige of scale but weakens those stable props. The background contains architectural suggestions—uprights, crossbars, panels and changes of colour—without specifying a salon. Social position remains visible through the commission, fashion and controlled bearing, but space itself has become an active pictorial problem.

The result is not pure flatness. Margaret's face, shoulders, hands and parts of the garment carry modelling. One arm bends beneath the encircling stole; the lower dress swells and recedes. Yet these bodily cues operate against broad fields that resist depth. Klimt allows naturalistic likeness and abstract organisation to remain in unresolved contact.

This helps explain why the portrait stands between phases of his work. The elongated dressed figure recalls the narrow, ornamented construction of Emilie Flöge, but Margaret's background is more insistently partitioned. The later Fritza Riedler converts a related tension between figure and geometric setting into a square, seated composition. Margaret's canvas has its own answer: vertical confinement, a pale garment and coloured planes calibrated around a standing body.^[3]

Face, Hands and the Distant Gaze

Margaret's face receives close descriptive attention. Flesh, features and dark hair remain legible against the surrounding simplification. The head turns slightly, and her eyes look away rather than confronting the viewer. This is not absent-mindedness recovered from a painted expression. It is a compositional choice that alters the portrait's social address.

Many related drawings give the figure a more direct gaze. The final turn separates the sitter from the viewer's demand for response. Her hands, partly involved with the stole, do not perform a narrative action or display an identifiable token. Face and hands secure bodily individuality while leaving intention inaccessible.^[4]

It would be easy to translate the effect into a fixed psychological description—aloof, melancholic, proud or dissatisfied. None can be verified from appearance alone. The more defensible observation is relational: Margaret is visibly present but does not return our look. Klimt's precision produces likeness without offering unrestricted access to the person.

The White Dress and Stole

The pale garment is central to the painting's structure. The Munich collection describes a long velvet-moiré Wiener Werkstätte dress with a matching stole and embroidered floral ornament. Klimt Database speaks more cautiously of a delicate white dress and stole whose painted materiality suggests velvet jacquard. These institutional descriptions agree that fabric and pattern matter, but they do not establish a surviving garment that can be physically tested.^[1][3]

The dress must also remain distinct from the medium. What viewers see is oil paint representing sheen, weight, weave and embroidered or woven effect. No cloth is attached to the canvas. The attribution to Wiener Werkstätte design belongs to the garment as represented and to the portrait's design context, not to the list of substances on the painting.^[1][2]

Klimt uses fabric to negotiate exposure. The stole passes around the arms but opens the shoulders, unlike the more enclosing arrangement in the Leopold study. Its ornament breaks the pale mass into intervals. Below, the dress widens, establishing the triangular support that the narrow format otherwise withholds. Cloth supplies both movement and compositional stability.

The colour white is not empty. Shifts of tone create volume, while nearby coloured planes alter how pale passages register. Rather than isolating Margaret in immaculate brightness, Klimt lets the garment absorb and reflect the environment's visual pressures.

Geometry without a Documented Room

The background is divided into coloured regions of different width and density. Some behave like walls or panels; others read simply as painted areas. A darker vertical band on one side and the ornamented field near the head resist a single, continuous depth. The lower horizontal element added after Berlin cuts across those uprights and makes the picture's surface harder to overlook.^[3]

This geometry belongs to the portrait, but it does not reproduce the Stonboroughs' Berlin apartment. The couple commissioned its Wiener Werkstätte furnishings in 1905, and that documented interest provides meaningful context. Still, no retained source identifies the canvas as an accurate interior view. Klimt's setting is an invented pictorial environment.^[2]

The same caution applies to later architecture. Margaret's Vienna house, developed with Paul Engelmann and Ludwig Wittgenstein in the 1920s, is important evidence of her role as a patron. It cannot be used as the source of rectangles painted two decades earlier. Similar interests in proportion and spatial control do not collapse separate projects into a prophecy.

Within the picture, geometry performs several tasks at once. It disciplines the long canvas, opposes the mobile edges of the dress and supplies contrasts against which head and hands become legible. It also prevents the portrait from settling into a simple equation of wealth with luxurious surroundings. Margaret occupies a designed world whose coherence remains visibly constructed.

The Original Frame and Viennese Design

The surviving original frame gives the painting a material relation to the Wiener Werkstätte beyond the represented clothing. Josef Hoffmann designed it, and the workshop executed it. This is a documented division of labour rather than a reason to call the whole object a joint painting.^[1][2]

Hoffmann and the Wiener Werkstätte were already deeply connected with the Wittgensteins. Karl supported the organisation and commissioned interiors; in the same year as the portrait's Berlin showing, Margaret and Jerome asked it to furnish their Berlin home. The frame therefore linked Klimt's canvas with both family patronage and contemporary interior design.^[2]

Its role is more than ornamental. A full-length painting approaching human height becomes furniture-like in its physical presence. The frame establishes an outer geometry against which Klimt's internal divisions can act. When installed in a staircase or drawing room, the ensemble would participate in an architecture while retaining its own boundary.

Authorship remains layered. Hoffmann's design, workshop execution, Klimt's image and the commissioners' choices meet in one displayed object. Acknowledging those parts restores the portrait's design history without weakening Klimt's authorship of the painted field.

Did Margaret Reject the Portrait?

The story that Margaret disliked the painting and banished it to an attic has circulated widely. The Munich collection repeats the account as an allegation. More recent Klimt Database research makes the evidentiary problem explicit: no concrete source currently proves that she rejected it.^[1][2]

One circumstance probably encouraged the legend. After marrying, Margaret moved to Berlin while the portrait remained in Vienna. But a large family commission staying in the Palais Wittgenstein does not by itself demonstrate dislike. The completed canvas was installed first in the palace staircase and later in the drawing room, positions inconsistent with a securely documented disappearance into storage.^[2]

The myth also benefits from retrospective psychology. The painting's distant gaze and severe geometry can be made to look like estrangement, then treated as evidence of Margaret's response. That reverses the direction of proof. A painted expression cannot authenticate a later anecdote.

The careful conclusion is modest: some accounts say she rejected the portrait, but surviving documentation has not established the story. Uncertainty is not a gap to fill with imagined dialogue.

Patron, Collector and Intellectual

Margaret's later activities complicate the idea that she was merely a reluctant society sitter. With Jerome she assembled a collection of French modern art that included works by artists such as Matisse, Gauguin, Picasso, Modigliani and Utrillo. A selection appeared at the Vienna Secession in 1934. She was also named with Hermine among donors associated with the opening of the Modern Gallery at the Belvedere's Orangery in 1929.^[2]

Her surviving archive reinforces this broader identity. The University of Innsbruck's Brenner Archive holds diaries from 1917 to 1919, notes and substantial correspondence. A 2025 university account of the published diaries highlights not only literary and philosophical reflection but also her engagement with people suffering deprivation during and after the First World War.^[6][7]

Architecture became another field of action. The house at Kundmanngasse is inseparable from Ludwig Wittgenstein's forceful involvement, but Margaret was the client who initiated a new residence and sustained the project. That choice belongs to the biography of the person portrayed; it is not an attribute Klimt encoded in the white dress.

Returning this agency to Margaret changes how the painting can be viewed. The canvas records how Klimt and her family presented her during a marriage transition. It does not contain her whole intellectual life. The disparity between a silent image and an active later career is not a failure of portraiture so much as a reminder of its limits.

From Palais Wittgenstein to Munich

After further work, the portrait was installed in the Palais Wittgenstein, initially in the staircase and subsequently in the drawing room. It remained within a family collection that also included several other paintings by Klimt. Domestic placement gave it a different function from the public experiment seen unfinished in Berlin: it became part of the family's own display of modern art.^[2]

The Nazi annexation of Austria in 1938 placed the Wittgenstein family, whose ancestry was Jewish, under persecution. Family members fled and worked through dangerous, coercive circumstances to secure their status and property. After the war, Margaret returned to her Vienna house and recovered a substantial part of Karl Wittgenstein's collection, including her Klimt portrait.^[2]

The current object record does not support a more elaborate wartime itinerary for the canvas. Recovery should not be expanded into a guessed hiding place, seizure route or restitution case. The secure statement is that the painting returned to Margaret's possession after the war.

The Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen acquired it from private ownership in 1960, two years after Margaret's death. The record does not name the seller, and none should be supplied by inference. It has since belonged to the Neue Pinakothek collection under inventory number 13074.^[1]

Where Is the Painting Now?

The Neue Pinakothek building is closed for renovation, with reopening planned for 2029. During the closure, selected nineteenth-century works are being shown in the Alte Pinakothek and the Sammlung Schack. The live collection record locates Margaret's portrait at “AP EG → Saal I”: the Alte Pinakothek, ground floor, Room I.^[1][8]

That location was current on 9 August 2026. It should not be treated as permanent, since museum rotations and renovation plans can change. The painting remains part of the Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen and the Neue Pinakothek collection even while displayed in another building.

Its temporary setting adds a final layer to an object repeatedly shaped by place: Klimt's studio, an unfinished Berlin exhibition state, the Palais Wittgenstein staircase and drawing room, and now a temporary Munich display during renovation. None changes the identity of the canvas. Each changes the conditions under which its narrow standing figure meets a viewer.

Why the Portrait Matters

Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein occupies a pivotal place in Klimt's portraiture because it makes development visible without reducing the work to a bridge between masterpieces. The painting transforms a life-size commission through extreme narrowness, an unstable architectural ground and a fabric system that both defines and disperses the body.

Its surviving evidence is equally important. Approximately thirty studies show Klimt searching for pose and garment. A photograph fixes an unfinished public state. Letters record dissatisfaction and the intention to continue. The final canvas shows specific background changes, while its signature preserves the earlier date. Few portraits allow viewers to distinguish so clearly among preparation, exhibition, revision and probable completion.^[2][3][4]

The picture also reveals how Viennese modernism was made through connected authorships and patronage. Klimt's oil painting, Hoffmann's frame design, Wiener Werkstätte execution, the represented fashion and the Wittgenstein family's commissioning culture meet without becoming the same material or the same creative act.

Most importantly, historical accuracy prevents the sitter from disappearing behind either family fame or a rejection anecdote. Margaret was present at the Berlin debut, became a collector and patron in her own right, maintained an extensive intellectual life, survived displacement and recovered the portrait after the war. Klimt's canvas captures one highly designed encounter with her. It should be read intensely, but not mistaken for the whole person.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Accessed August 2026.

1. Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, “Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein”: holder title, 1905 date, oil-on-canvas medium, dimensions, inventory number, original frame, acquisition and current display code. View source.
2. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Wittgenstein Family”: family patronage, commission, names, marriage, Berlin presentation, completion, frame, rejection caution, later collecting and wartime recovery. View source.
3. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Klimt Affair Surrounding the Faculty Paintings”: portrait development, 1904 commission evidence, unfinished Berlin state, reception, photographic record, background alterations and stylistic context. View source.
4. Leopold Museum Online Collection, “Standing Lady from the Right, Her Hands Covered by Her Shawl. Study for Portrait of Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein”: approximately thirty-study context and object data for inventory 1352. View source.
5. Albertina Online Collection, “Study for the Portrait of Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein: Standing from the Front with a Slight Turn to the Left”: 1904 black-chalk study, dimensions, inventory and catalogue association. View source.
6. University of Innsbruck, Brenner Archive, “Margarete Stonborough-Wittgenstein Collection”: sitter dates, diaries, notes and family correspondence in the archive. View source.
7. University of Innsbruck, “The Diaries of Margaret Stonborough-Wittgenstein”: dated account of the published diaries, their period and their record of literary reflection and social engagement. View source.
8. Pinakothek, “Visit”: Neue Pinakothek renovation closure, planned reopening and temporary display arrangements. View source.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Death and Life

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

The Three Ages of Woman

Water Serpents I