Medicine

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About Medicine

At the lower edge of Gustav Klimt's Medicine, the goddess Hygieia faced the viewer. A snake curled around her arm and drank from a bowl. She wore gleaming ornament and stood with ceremonial authority. Behind her rose a dense current of naked people: infants and the old, lovers and sufferers, a pregnant woman and a skeleton.^[1][2]

The contrast was the painting's provocation. Hygieia embodied health, but she did not control the lives around her. Human beings drifted through birth, desire, illness and death while the faculty's deity remained magnificently present and visibly separate.

Medicine was meant for the ceiling of the University of Vienna's Great Hall. It never reached that location. Klimt first exhibited the immense oil painting in 1901, revised it repeatedly and completed its final state in 1907. The original was destroyed in the fire at Immendorf Castle in May 1945.^[1][3]

Its composition survives through drawings, an oil sketch, photographs and printed reproductions. One historic colour collotype records Hygieia in red and gold. Modern recolourisations offer a researched impression of the lost whole, but most of the original palette cannot be known with the same confidence.^[1][4]

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• TitleMedicine (Medizin)
• TypeFaculty Painting commissioned for the University of Vienna Great Hall ceiling
• Original mediumOil on canvas
• Original dimensionsApproximately 430 × 300 centimetres^[1]
• Work begunEarly studies from 1894; monumental painting under way around 1900^[2][3]
• First public state10th Vienna Secession exhibition, March–May 1901^[3]
• Later statesSubstantial revisions documented in 1903 and completed by 1907^[3][5]
• Principal figureHygieia, Greek goddess of health and daughter of Asclepius
• Principal groupA vertically drifting stream of humanity containing many ages and conditions
• Major motifsPregnancy, newborn life, old age, suffering, erotic contact, a skeleton and an isolated floating woman
• Preparatory recordMore than 200 drawings are currently associated with the painting in the Albertina's evolving catalogue^[2]
• Surviving oil studyThe Israel Museum holds Klimt's 1897–98 compositional sketch, oil on canvas, 74.7 × 54.8 centimetres^[6]
• Historic colour evidenceA 1931 collotype preserves a red-and-gold impression of Hygieia^[7]
• FateOriginal destroyed at Immendorf Castle in May 1945^[1]
• Current public reconstructionA large-scale replica derived from the modern colour reconstruction has covered the Anna Spiegel Research Building façade at MedUni Vienna since November 2024^[1][8]

A Lost Painting, Not a Surviving Object

The familiar image of Medicine is usually a reproduction. This fact changes how every visual claim should be made.

Black-and-white photographs record the overall arrangement and tonal structure of the canvas. They show where Hygieia stood, how the human bodies overlapped, where the skeleton appeared and how open mist opposed the crowded stream. Because Klimt kept revising the painting, different photographs can document different states.^[3][5]

Drawings bring individual figures closer. They record a sleeping baby, a pregnant nude, wrestling men, old bodies, the skeleton, Hygieia and the floating woman in many alternatives. They show what Klimt tested; they do not all belong to one final arrangement.^[2][9]

Printed images offer further evidence. A 1903–04 heliogravure records a stage between the first public version and the final revision. A later portfolio records the mature composition. The 1931 Hygieia collotype is especially valuable because it supplies historic colour information for that detail.^[5][7]

The original painted surface is gone. No modern replica can restore its exact brushwork, colour relationships, metallic effects or scale as experienced under exhibition lighting. The surviving materials allow a close reconstruction of structure and development, but they also require restraint.

The Composition as a Whole

Medicine was strongly asymmetrical. Most of its human bodies accumulated on the right. The left opened into a pale atmospheric field occupied by one floating woman. Between the two, gestures reached across the gap.^[1][2]

This was not a crowd assembled on the ground. Bodies appeared to rise, drift or turn within a vertical current. Klimt used overlap to make the group feel larger than the painted field: figures entered and disappeared at its edges, as if the canvas showed one portion of an endless procession.^[9]

The format intensified that movement. At more than four metres high and only about three metres wide, the painting pulled the eye upward. The intended ceiling position would have complicated gravity further. Figures already suspended in uncertain space would be seen above viewers in the Great Hall.

Hygieia interrupted the current. She stood near the lower centre and faced outward, her body organised into a stable, column-like presence. The contrast between her frontal clarity and the overlapping crowd made her visible from a distance.

Yet she was not a foundation supporting the others. The stream continued behind and above her. Her symbolism named medicine, while the composition reserved most of its area for conditions medicine confronts.

The Stream of Humanity

The Albertina describes children, pregnant women, young and old people, men and women, and wrestling bodies inside the stream. Many have closed eyes. A skeleton at its upper edge reminds the viewer that death belongs to the same current as birth.^[2]

The figures are physically close but psychologically inward. One torso hides another. Heads lean or turn away. Some bodies seem to sleep or dream, while others struggle. The density creates contact without community: proximity does not guarantee that one person can relieve another's condition.

Albertina scholarship calls this group “Suffering Humanity.” The phrase is useful because the bodies do not illustrate separate diseases. Klimt did not paint a clinical inventory in which each symptom could be diagnosed. Pain, exhaustion, desire, age and vulnerability are made collective.^[9]

That abstraction does not make the bodies generic. Klimt's drawings began with individual models and exact poses. A bowed old man carries a different weight from a sleeping infant; the interlocked wrestlers create another kind of tension. The final current joins observed differences without erasing them.

The stream connects Medicine with Klimt's earlier Faculty Painting Philosophy. There too, naked humanity passed through stages from birth to decline. In Medicine, however, the group became larger and more intensely corporeal. The question shifted from humanity before cosmic mystery to humanity exposed to suffering and death.^[3][9]

The Floating Woman and the Newborn Child

The left side's isolation gives the floating nude unusual importance. She is separated from the crowd by open mist, yet a man's arm reaches out from the human mass towards her. Her own arm extends back, helping to close the visual circuit.^[2]

A newborn child floats near her feet, wrapped in a fine cocoon-like envelope. Albertina's study account interprets the woman as giving birth and embodying the continuation of humanity. Her body projects outward while also seeming to dissolve into the surrounding atmosphere.^[2][9]

Klimt worked on this figure over several years. Early studies test frontal and profile positions, extended arms and different degrees of weightlessness. The length of this search suggests that her task was not simply to fill an empty side. She had to appear connected to the stream without becoming another member of its crowd.^[9]

The surviving 1897–98 oil study already contains a floating nude to the upper left. The Israel Museum describes the figure's dreamlike face and the picture's swirling theatrical movement. In the later painting, the separation became more severe and the current more crowded.^[6]

Birth is therefore not represented as a secure beginning on a horizontal timeline. Mother and child are suspended in the same uncertain space as the dying. A reaching gesture joins them to humanity, but no ground stabilises the event.

Two Readings of the Floating Woman

The figure's ambiguity is preserved in the different emphases of two institutional accounts. The Albertina's study history connects the woman with childbirth and the continuation of humankind. MedUni Vienna describes her inclined, outstretched posture as submission to illness and death.^[1][9]

These readings are not mutually exclusive. The newborn at her feet supports the first, while her weightless body, closed relation to the mist and proximity to the mortal stream support the second. Klimt placed generation in a posture that can also suggest surrender.

The reaching arms prevent either interpretation from becoming complete. A male arm emerges from the crowd and touches or approaches the woman; she extends an arm towards the bodies in return. The connection can be read as rescue, attraction, circulation or the pull of life back into the collective current.

Because the original has vanished, precise descriptions must also acknowledge the photograph's limits. Tonal evidence secures the broad relationship among body, mist and crowd. It cannot settle whether a lost colour accent made the woman appear more vital, spectral or threatened.

The best reading keeps birth and mortality together. She does not stand outside the stream as a simple mother emblem, nor does she become only a victim of death. Her suspended body makes continuation itself precarious.

Pregnancy and the Skeleton

One of the most discussed figures is the naked pregnant woman within the stream. Her body gives pregnancy a direct physical presence rarely admitted into official monumental decoration at the time. She is not draped as a remote fertility goddess; the condition is carried by a recognisable human body.^[1][9]

The skeleton appears close enough to make mortality inseparable from emerging life. Its function is not to predict the death of one named mother or child. It places every beginning under the general condition of ending.

Klimt explored pregnancy and age together on paper. One sheet pairs a naked pregnant woman with the upper body of an old man bent in grief. The juxtaposition anticipates the painting's refusal to separate life's stages into comforting compartments.^[9]

Contemporary scandal can make the pregnant nude seem like the sole cause of outrage. The record is more complex. Her reproduction contributed to the confiscation of a Ver Sacrum issue on public-morality grounds, but objections to Medicine also concerned its entire view of the faculty: suffering and death outweighed scientific triumph.^[3]

The figure matters because she joins those two anxieties. She challenged decorum, and she made the limits of medical authority visible at the very point where new life begins.

Hygieia

Hygieia is the only figure who directly meets the viewer's gaze. Her face, posture and ornament separate her from the trance-like stream. The body is frontal, the garment columnar and the arms arranged with ceremonial economy.^[1][2]

In Greek tradition Hygieia is a daughter of Asclepius and a deity of health. She is invoked with Asclepius in the ancient Hippocratic Oath. Her name gives modern languages words associated with hygiene, but Klimt's figure belongs to cult and myth rather than a portrait of a contemporary physician.^[1]

The snake around her arm is the serpent of Asclepius, a medical symbol whose movement contrasts with her stillness. It bends towards the bowl she holds. The two attributes make her identity readable even within an unfamiliar composition.

The Albertina interprets the liquid as water from Lethe, the river of forgetfulness associated with entry into the realm of the dead. It also relates the surrounding closed eyes to the ancient practice of temple sleep, in which sufferers sought healing through dreams at a sanctuary.^[2] Those readings deepen the boundary between cure, sleep and death, but they should remain attached to the institution's interpretation rather than treated as labels written on the lost canvas.

Hygieia's historic colour impression survives through a detail collotype published in Max Eisler's Gustav Klimt: Eine Nachlese in 1931. Red and gold make the figure radiant and materially unlike the bodies behind her.^[7] This detail is direct evidence for her reproduced appearance; it does not establish the exact hues of every other passage.

Her expression is difficult to classify. She does not appear consoling, alarmed or absorbed in treatment. The frontal gaze can seem impassive, proud or ritualised. That emotional distance is central to the painting's force. The goddess represents health without performing a cure before us.

Snake, Bowl and Gesture

Klimt had considered Hygieia from the commission's earliest years. A circa-1894 study showed her sitting on a cloud with a bowl and coiling snake. By the 1897–98 oil sketch she had become more rigidly frontal, wearing a mistletoe wreath and holding the faculty's attributes near the lower edge.^[3][6]

The final figure grew still more ornamental. Photographic and reproductive comparisons show that Klimt replaced the earlier laurel wreath with a floral headdress and added gold details during later revision.^[3]

These changes did not merely decorate a settled personification. Ornament altered Hygieia's relation to the stream. Her hard-edged frontality pressed towards the surface, while the crowded bodies remained atmospheric and overlapping. She became closer to an icon or officiant than a participant in the event behind her.

The angled arm gesture helps produce that effect. In the drawings, Klimt tested the folds of the garment and the simple turn of the hands. The bowl is displayed rather than actively offered to a particular patient. The snake drinks, but humanity receives no visible medicine.^[9]

This is why Hygieia cannot be dismissed as a conventional label pasted onto a pessimistic picture. Her grandeur is real. Klimt grants medicine a powerful emblem, then asks what that emblem means when mortality remains in view.

The Erotic and the Painful

The bodies in Medicine do not divide neatly into sufferers and lovers. A kneeling woman, wrestling men, intertwined figures and the floating nude bring sensuality into the same field as age and death. Klimt treats Eros and mortality as concurrent forces rather than opposite subjects.^[1][3]

For contemporary viewers, this mixture could seem especially inappropriate. A medical faculty might accept anatomical nakedness under scientific discipline or ideal nudity under allegorical convention. Klimt's bodies appeared vulnerable, desiring and psychologically withdrawn without submitting to either framework.

The charge of pessimism emerged from this lack of resolution. Sexuality continues life, but it does not defeat death. Medicine addresses suffering, but the painting does not show a cure. The stream carries ecstasy and pain together.

It would be too simple to call the work anti-medical. Hygieia remains visually commanding, and the patient observation of bodies depends on a culture deeply interested in human physiology and psychology. The painting is critical of triumphal representation more clearly than it is hostile to knowledge.

More Than 200 Drawings

Beginning in 1894, Klimt made more than 200 drawings now associated with Medicine. The Albertina's figure is dynamic: it reflects current catalogue relationships and may change as scholarship develops. It is not a documented total Klimt himself assigned to the project.^[2]

The sheets range from first ideas and individual studies to compositional and transfer drawings. They make the long span of work visible. Every major type—the goddess, floating woman, pregnant body, wrestlers, child, elderly figures and skeleton—was tested separately.^[2][9]

Klimt often drew several possibilities on one sheet. Five small studies of a sleeping baby investigate slight changes of curl and repose. Wrestling bodies become interlocking geometry. A rhythmic line gives the skeleton movement rather than treating it as a static emblem.^[9]

Some later drawings change technique. A seated male nude related to the 1903 state uses red chalk and presents a meditative back. Albertina scholarship cautiously notes that Klimt used red chalk relatively often, perhaps in view of the painting's dominant red as then recorded.^[9] The drawing's colour is secure; its exact relation to the lost canvas remains interpretive.

The studies also resist sensationalism. A pregnant nude that shocked print censors appears in the studio as a problem of weight, contour and human condition. The old and sick are observed without caricature. Klimt's radicalism depended on patient looking.

The 1897–98 Oil Sketch

The Israel Museum holds the only surviving oil study for one of Klimt's destroyed University paintings. At 74.7 by 54.8 centimetres, it is much smaller than the original but preserves an important transitional conception of Medicine.^[6]

Hygieia stands in the lower foreground with bowl and wreath. Above and beside her, figures turn in a broad vortex. A gaunt woman and a skull emerging from dark drapery make sickness and death explicit. The floating nude appears within a more theatrical atmosphere than in the later composition.^[6]

The sketch shows Klimt between decorative traditions. Sweeping motion and dramatic light recall Baroque ceiling painting, while Hygieia's frontal stiffness and encircled head anticipate the flatter, more ornamental solutions of his Secession years.^[6]

When the study was presented to the artistic commissions in 1898, Klimt was asked to clothe the floating nude or replace her with a male figure. The request reveals that bodily decorum was disputed before the public scandal of 1901.^[6]

Klimt did not simply enlarge the sketch. He retained its principal tensions while rebuilding the crowd, sharpening the asymmetry and altering Hygieia. The surviving oil therefore documents a stage of invention, not a miniature copy of the destroyed final work.

From the 1901 Exhibition to the 1907 Painting

The first public presentation took place at the Vienna Secession in 1901. The canvas was installed as the exhibition's principal attraction in a slightly tilted, box-like setting. This staging gave viewers a more direct encounter than the intended high ceiling would have allowed.^[3]

Klimt revised the work after its debut. Photographs record a second and third state by 1903, when all three Faculty Paintings were shown together and catalogued as unfinished. Figures, ornaments and tonal relationships continued to change.^[3]

A Belvedere heliogravure dated 1903–04 largely records the state shown at the 1903 Klimt exhibition. It must not be mistaken for the original painting: it is an 88.6 by 61.2 centimetre print that fixes one phase in monochrome.^[5]

Later reproductions show the final version completed by 1907. Klimt increased gold ornament and altered Hygieia's headdress. These revisions brought Medicine closer to the decorative brilliance associated with his mature work while preserving the vulnerable human current.^[3]

The changing object complicates familiar dates. “1901” names the scandalous first public state. “1903” can name an important exhibited revision. “1907” identifies final completion. No single date should erase that history.

Beyond the First Vienna Exhibition

The 1901 Secession presentation dominates the painting's reputation, but Medicine did not remain confined to the argument in Vienna. Its movement through exhibitions changed both its audience and its physical framing.

In June 1901 the painting appeared at the eighth International Art Exhibition in Munich's Glaspalast. An exhibition photograph shows it opposite the entrance in a neutral, box-like setting that separated the tall canvas from patterned wallpaper. The Klimt Database describes it as the presentation's outstanding attraction.^[3]

This setting matters because the painting was still being judged without its intended ceiling. A framed, slightly tilted or isolated canvas meets a viewer as an autonomous work. Its crowd and Hygieia can be examined frontally rather than glimpsed overhead within a coordinated architectural scheme.

Klimt sent Medicine to Prague in 1903, and later that year the Vienna Secession displayed it beside Philosophy and Jurisprudence. The joint exhibition identified all three as unfinished, so international circulation and public criticism occurred while the works were still changing.^[3]

The final versions appeared together in Vienna and Berlin in 1907. By then Medicine had lived several public lives: scandalous state commission, Secession centrepiece, travelling modern painting and revised member of a lost ceiling ensemble. Its reception cannot be reduced to the first hostile headlines.

The Scandal of 1901

The reception of Philosophy the previous year had made the next painting a test of the entire commission. Medicine intensified the conflict and carried it into parliament.^[3]

More than twenty representatives directed an interpellation to the Imperial-Royal Minister of Education. Critics argued that the painting failed to honour the Viennese School of Medicine and presented the discipline as powerless before illness and death. Its nudity, pregnancy and eroticism attracted moral outrage.^[3]

The sixth issue of Ver Sacrum reproduced studies and an image of the painting. Authorities confiscated it for violation of public morality, particularly in connection with the naked pregnant figure. Censorship spread the dispute from a monumental canvas to printed circulation.^[3]

Supporters saw something different. Klimt had declined “schoolmasterly” translation and converted an abstract faculty into human experience. The painting did not list achievements because it addressed the condition that makes medicine necessary.

The hostile and supportive positions agree on the essential fact: Hygieia did not preside over a triumph. The painting defined medical knowledge through the suffering it encounters and the limits it cannot abolish.

Why the Painting Troubled Physicians

Vienna's medical establishment had strong reasons to expect celebration. The nineteenth-century University had become associated with influential clinicians, researchers and teaching traditions. An official ceiling could have turned that history into progress embodied.

Klimt instead removed named doctors, instruments, laboratories and scenes of successful care. Viewers met naked bodies without profession or rank. The stream included the entire human span, making every observer a potential participant rather than a spectator admiring institutional achievement.

Hygieia's mythic status sharpened the issue. She belongs to healing, but also to ritual, snake symbolism and ancient religion. The Albertina's Lethe and dream-sleep interpretations bring her close to forgetfulness and death as well as cure.^[2]

This did not make the painting irrational. It challenged a narrow definition of reason. Medicine can explain, prevent and heal many conditions while remaining unable to make human life invulnerable. Klimt monumentalised that boundary.

What Happened to Medicine

Klimt withdrew from the University commission in 1905 and recovered the three paintings after repaying the advances he had received. Medicine remained with him until Koloman Moser acquired it between 1910 and 1912. After Moser's death, the family sold it in 1919, and patrons enabled it to enter the Austrian Gallery.^[1]

During the Second World War it was taken with the other Faculty Paintings to Immendorf Castle. The castle and stored artworks were destroyed by fire in May 1945. Retreating SS units are often said to have started the blaze, although the Medical University appropriately presents that agency as alleged.^[1]

The painting's museum ownership distinguishes it from Philosophy and Jurisprudence, which had been confiscated from the Jewish Lederer family. All three shared the final depot and destruction, but not the same preceding provenance.

Reconstruction and the MedUni Façade

In 2005 a black-and-white reproduction of Medicine was installed in its intended ceiling position at the University of Vienna. It shows the structure at architectural scale while openly marking the original's absence.^[1]

In 2021 Google Arts & Culture and the Belvedere produced a digital recolourisation using historical descriptions, comparisons with surviving Klimt paintings, expert guidance and machine learning. The historic Hygieia detail supplied direct colour evidence for one area. Elsewhere the result is a researched hypothesis rather than recovered fact.^[4]

On 13 November 2024 MedUni Vienna unveiled a large replica based on the reconstruction on the façade of the Anna Spiegel Research Building at its General Hospital campus. The display connects the lost allegory with a functioning medical institution and makes the composition visible from public space.^[8]

Its setting reverses the original failure without pretending to undo it. Klimt's canvas still does not survive, and the façade is not the University Great Hall ceiling. The replica gives Medicine a new civic life precisely because its reconstructed status can be stated.

What Medicine Means

The painting can be called pessimistic, but the word is not sufficient. The stream includes birth, contact and erotic vitality as well as suffering. Hygieia remains brilliant and attentive. What disappears is the promise that any one faculty can convert the whole cycle into triumph.

Klimt's central contrast is between representation and power. Hygieia represents medicine unmistakably. Yet representing health is not the same as commanding life. The bodies behind her remain subject to time.

The work's candour also has an ethical dimension. Infancy, pregnancy, age and physical distress are not pushed outside the ceremonial field. The people most likely to disrupt an ideal image of knowledge become the image's substance.

The viewer stands where a patient might stand: addressed by an emblem of health while aware of vulnerable bodies. Hygieia's gaze does not promise rescue. It makes us acknowledge that medicine's dignity begins in facing what it cannot finally remove.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Accessed August 2026.

1. Medical University of Vienna, “The Medicine by Gustav Klimt,” object dimensions, composition, ownership, destruction, surviving colour evidence, reconstruction and current display. View source.
2. Albertina Museum, “The Faculty Painting of Medicine,” more than 200 associated drawings, Hygieia, Lethe, temple sleep and the stream of humanity. View source.
3. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Golden Knight and Femmes Fatales,” creation, versions, 1901 staging, parliamentary response, censorship and final revisions. View source.
4. Google Arts & Culture and Belvedere, “The Klimt Color Enigma,” surviving colour clues and the expert-guided machine-learning reconstruction method. View source.
5. Belvedere, Vienna, “Medicine,” 1903–04 heliogravure recording an intermediate state, medium and dimensions. View source.
6. The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, “Compositional Sketch for Medicine,” 1897–98 oil study, dimensions, provenance and relation to the 1898 committee review. View source.
7. Gustav Klimt | Wien 1900 Foundation, “Hygieia — Detail from the Faculty Painting Medicine,” 1931 colour collotype, medium and object record. View source.
8. Medical University of Vienna, “Unveiling of the Façade Medicine,” 13 November 2024 installation, location and replica status. View source.
9. Albertina Museum, “Klimt's Studies for the Faculty Painting Medicine,” model studies, figure development, drawing media and relationship between Medicine and Philosophy. View source.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Death and Life

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

The Three Ages of Woman

Water Serpents I