The Dancer

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About The Dancer

A young woman stands within a room that refuses to behave like ordinary space. Her upper body is bare, patterned fabric gathers around her, an anemone bouquet rises at one side and flowers form a halo-like field behind her head. Table, wall, robe and blossom seem to exchange places. Near the bottom, the illusion breaks: charcoal construction remains exposed where Gustav Klimt had not finished painting.

The Dancer is a late oil canvas, dated 1916–17 by Neue Galerie New York and held in a private collection. Its unfinished lower third gives unusually direct evidence of Klimt's movement from drawn outline towards saturated paint. The developed upper area is not proof that the whole work was complete; the visible charcoal is not damage.^[1][2]

Its identity is also layered. Albertina now identifies the dancer represented in a closely related drawing as Johanna Jusl, a member of the Hofoper ballet. Separately, testimony and scholarship propose that Klimt created the work by transforming an unsatisfactory posthumous portrait of Ria Munk. No cited forensic examination has yet recovered or confirmed a complete Ria portrait beneath the present surface.^[3][4]

Those propositions answer different questions. Jusl concerns the visible dancer. Ria concerns a possible earlier commission or image. Keeping them apart allows the surviving painting to remain what it visibly became: a standing dancer absorbed into one of Klimt's most spatially unstable late interiors.

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• TitleThe Dancer^[1]
• Date1916–17 according to Neue Galerie; also catalogued circa 1916/17 or circa 1916–18^[1][4][7]
• StateUnfinished; the lower third retains visible charcoal construction^[1][2]
• MediumOil on canvas, with charcoal drawing exposed in the incomplete area^[1][2]
• DimensionsApproximately 180 × 90 centimetres^[6][7]
• Current ownershipPrivate collection^[1]
• Visible dancerAlbertina's current record identifies Johanna Jusl, a dancer in the Hofoper ballet, through the related 1916–17 study^[3]
• Possible earlier identityA posthumous Ria Munk portrait may have been reworked into the present composition; concrete forensic confirmation remains pending^[1][4][6]
• Related drawingAlbertina inventory 32860, graphite on paper, 49.6 × 32.4 centimetres, signed GUSTAV KLIMT, 1916–17^[3]
• Not the same object asthe Stoclet figure Expectation, Lady with a Fan, or the separate unfinished Portrait of Ria Munk III
• 1922 exhibitionShown at the opening of the New York Wiener Werkstätte branch on Fifth Avenue; Neue Galerie calls it the first Klimt painting to travel to the United States^[1]
• Current accessNo permanent public display is established as of 9 August 2026; the painting remains privately owned^[1][6]

What “Unfinished” Means Here

Neue Galerie explicitly labels The Dancer unfinished. It states that the lower third remains incomplete and that portions of Klimt's preliminary charcoal drawing can still be seen.^[1]

The designation applies to the whole object, even though face, torso, flowers and much of the surrounding colour are highly developed. A painting can be visually compelling and substantially worked while still falling short of the state its artist would have called finished.

Klimt died on 6 February 1918. Because he left no final instruction for this canvas, the exposed lower area cannot tell us exactly what colours, patterns or adjustments he would have added. It records a working condition, not a recoverable future.

Nor should incompletion be confused with later loss. Charcoal showing through the lower support is not paint rubbed away from a previously completed passage in the account used here. It is construction that Klimt had not yet fully covered.

Charcoal Before Oil

Neue Galerie describes Klimt beginning with a charcoal outline on the primed canvas and then filling details in oil, initially concentrating on the face.^[2] The Dancer makes that transition visible within one support.

At the bottom, line establishes position and boundary with relative economy. Higher up, oil accumulates into flesh, flowers, cloth and an interior whose parts increasingly merge. The contrast helps explain how Klimt could build elaborate surface from a drawn armature.

It would be unsafe to turn this evidence into a universal sequence for every painting. A surviving unfinished canvas shows one late working situation; it does not prove that Klimt always completed faces first or followed identical stages without revision.

Here the process has a particular compositional effect. As paint density increases upward, the dancer seems to enter ornament. The unfinished lower area keeps body and ground more separable, while the developed zone makes their boundaries increasingly difficult to hold.

A Figure Both Exposed and Enclosed

The dancer presents her bare upper body towards the viewer, but the pose does not place her in empty space. Pattern, flowers and furniture press close around her, and the wrap below the torso participates in the room's colour.

Neue Galerie calls the garment a kimono and describes it as a link between the anemone bouquet and the flower aureole.^[1] “Kimono” is its institutional term; in direct visual description, the securely visible fact is a richly patterned robe or wrap gathered around the lower figure.

Nudity does not identify profession, sexuality or private intimacy. The title and Albertina's dancer identification supply performance context, but the canvas does not depict a named stage role, theatre or choreography.

The body's stillness is striking. Movement belongs less to a captured dance step than to the surrounding relations among cloth, bouquet and spatial planes. “Dancer” identifies the woman while the painting makes the environment perform.

Face and Flower Halo

The face is one of the most resolved areas. It emerges from a ring or aureole of flowers that functions like ornament, backdrop and extension of the figure at once.^[1]

A halo can invite sacred comparison, but these blossoms do not identify the dancer as a saint. They intensify her visual prominence and blur the edge between coiffure, floral field and room.

The concentrated face also demonstrates the method Neue Galerie describes. Modelling and colour have advanced furthest where recognition is strongest, while the lower body remains less resolved.^[2]

That imbalance is not evidence that Klimt intended a disembodied portrait. It records interrupted labour. The finished-looking face draws the viewer into an image whose lower support immediately reveals that completion was uneven.

The Anemone Bouquet

A dense bouquet of anemones occupies the table beside the dancer. Neue Galerie treats it as one pole in a floral chain: bouquet, patterned garment and mosaic-like aureole connect foreground to figure and background.^[1]

Ordinary perspective would keep cut flowers on a horizontal tabletop clearly in front of a vertical wall. Klimt weakens those distinctions. The bouquet rises into the same chromatic field as the flowers around the head, and the table's plane can be hard to maintain.

The anemones do not require a fixed symbolic translation. They may carry cultural associations with transience or love, but the object-specific evidence used here supports their formal work more securely: colour concentration, rhythmic repetition and spatial linkage.

Flowers also complicate portraiture. Instead of framing the body from a respectful distance, they compete with it for attention. The dancer becomes the most recognisable form within a surface that continually threatens to disperse her.

An Interior That Turns

The Klimt Database identifies The Dancer as an unusual late interior. Rather than setting the figure against a single ornamental carpet, Klimt introduces objects and planes that flip between horizontal and vertical.^[4]

The bouquet may appear securely in front, then seem to climb into the background. Fabric can belong to the woman's clothing and to the larger field. Floral motifs flatten furniture, wall and body into neighbouring patches.

This is not failed perspective. Enough evidence of a room remains for the instability to be felt. If Klimt had eliminated depth entirely, there would be no spatial expectation to overturn.

The picture asks the viewer to switch repeatedly between recognition and surface. One moment there is a woman beside a table; the next, a vertical arrangement of flesh, flowers and pattern. Neither reading permanently defeats the other.

A Qualified Matisse Comparison

The Klimt Database says the ambivalent spatial arrangement recalls interiors by Henri Matisse.^[4] The comparison helps place the painting within a wider modern rethinking of rooms, textiles and flattened planes.

It does not establish that Klimt copied one Matisse canvas. No particular source object or direct statement is supplied. “Recalls” or “can be compared with” is therefore more accurate than “derives from.”

Both artists could make patterned surroundings compete with bodies and could allow tabletops or walls to lose ordinary depth. Klimt's solution remains specific: an unfinished vertical figure, a flower aureole and exposed charcoal at the base.

The comparison is most useful when it returns attention to the object. The interior is modern not because it resembles another painter in general, but because it makes perspective active and uncertain.

The Albertina Study

Albertina's Study for “The Dancer (Ria Munk II)” is dated 1916–17. It is graphite on paper, 49.6 × 32.4 centimetres, inventory 32860, and signed at lower right GUSTAV KLIMT.^[3]

The drawing provides a secure link to the visible dancer and to the reworking discussion. Its title retains the Ria Munk II association, while its descriptive record now identifies the dancer as Johanna Jusl.^[3]

This sheet is evidence for pose and visible identity, not an X-ray of the canvas. Graphite records a figure Klimt studied for the transformed composition. It cannot by itself reveal what paint may lie beneath the present image.

The distinction is particularly important because the object's history invites conflation. A study can belong to the act of overpainting or reconception without depicting the person supposedly present in the earlier state.

Johanna Jusl and the Visible Dancer

Albertina's record, last edited in May 2026, states that the dancer was Johanna Jusl, a member of the Hofoper ballet.^[3] This is the strongest current institutional identification for the visible figure used here.

It should remain attached to the drawing and the dancer who emerges in the final composition. The identification does not prove that Jusl was the sitter for a prior portrait, that she knew Ria Munk or that the painting records a particular performance.

Nor does her profession turn the image into documentary theatre history. No costume, role, stage scenery or dance notation is securely named. Klimt used a dancer's body and presence within a highly constructed interior.

The finding nonetheless changes responsible description. “Unknown dancer” is now too absolute; “Albertina identifies her as Johanna Jusl” preserves both the evidence and its institutional source.

The Ria Munk Commission

Maria “Ria” Munk died in 1911 at the age of twenty-four. Her parents, Alexander and Aranka Munk, commissioned Klimt to make posthumous portraits.^[5]

The first surviving effort, Ria Munk on Her Deathbed, dates from 1912. Correspondence shows that the commission troubled Klimt, and in 1913 he complained that the Munk portrait had become a painful problem because he could not achieve a likeness.^[5]

That chronology supplies the reason scholars have looked for later attempts. The parents wanted a commemorative likeness; Klimt continued working; at least one subsequent full-length portrait was not accepted as a successful solution.

The history should not be dramatised beyond the record. Ria's death and the family's grief explain the commission, not every flower, exposed body or spatial reversal in the eventual dancer composition.

Erich Lederer's Testimony

Erich Lederer, related to the Munk family, later attested that Klimt received a full-figure commission and transformed the unsatisfactory image into The Dancer. Lentos describes the visible dancer as hypothetically concealing an overpainted Ria portrait.^[6]

Neue Galerie similarly calls reuse of Klimt's second effort “one theory.”^[1] The Klimt Database considers a revised Ria portrait plausible but says concrete forensic investigation is still pending.^[4]

These formulations converge on possibility, not material proof. Testimony connects the canvas to the commission; format and chronology support the relationship; the present published evidence does not establish a complete hidden face, dress or colour scheme.

The responsible statement is therefore that The Dancer may have developed through the reworking of Ria Munk II. It is not accurate to announce that an X-ray has discovered a fully preserved portrait underneath.

Two Identities on Different Levels

Johanna Jusl and Ria Munk should not be treated as rival answers to one sitter question. They occupy different proposed moments in the object's making.

Jusl is the visible dancer identified by Albertina through a related graphite study. Ria is the subject of a posthumous commission that testimony says was overpainted or reconceived. One concerns the surface Klimt developed; the other concerns what may have preceded it.

This layered explanation also avoids calling the surviving image a failed portrait. Whatever its origin, Klimt gave the new dancer a distinct body, floral environment and spatial structure. The transformation is an artistic act, not merely concealment.

Until object-specific technical examination supplies more, the underlayer should remain hypothetical. The visible painting does not need a proved hidden portrait to justify close attention.

Not Portrait of Ria Munk III

Klimt made another full-length posthumous portrait in 1917, generally called Portrait of Ria Munk III. It remained unfinished and is a separate canvas.^[5]

That third portrait has its own ownership and restitution history. None of those events should be transferred to The Dancer merely because both works are connected to the Munk commission.

The distinction also clarifies state. Ria Munk III is unfinished as a recognisable portrait. The Dancer is unfinished in its lower third after a proposed transformation into a new subject. Their exposed working passages answer different questions.

Similar dimensions and upright formats support comparison, not identity. There are at least two physical canvases, not a single object with interchangeable current titles.

Not the Stoclet Expectation

The profile woman in the Stoclet dining-room ensemble is sometimes called The Dancer in English. She is more securely identified as Expectation and belongs to Klimt's 1905–11 design for a mosaic environment.

That figure stands in rigid profile with a highly patterned dress and was translated from Klimt's paper design into executed mosaic by specialist workshops. The accepted Expectation object is not the 1916–17 private oil canvas discussed here.

The title overlap is historical vocabulary, not evidence that Klimt repeated one dancer as the same work. Medium, date, pose, commission and architectural setting all separate them.

No Egyptianising source claim or Stoclet material should therefore migrate to this canvas.

Not Lady with a Fan

Lady with a Fan was labelled Tänzerin—Dancer—in a 1920/21 exhibition record, but it is another late oil painting. It shows an unknown sitter holding a fan before an East Asian-inspired field and is now catalogued under its own title.

The historical label can confuse searches, especially because both works are almost-complete or unfinished late images of women in patterned settings. Their objects, dimensions, poses and histories are separate.

The present Dancer is the tall circa-180 × 90-centimetre canvas with bare upper body, bouquet, floral aureole and unfinished lower third.^[1][6] Lady with a Fan is neither an earlier title nor a completed state of it.

Keeping the distinction brief protects what is unusual here: the interior's spatial reversal and the contested transformation from posthumous portrait to visible dancer.

The 1922 New York Exhibition

Neue Galerie states that The Dancer was the first Klimt painting to travel to the United States. It was shown when the New York branch of the Wiener Werkstätte opened on Fifth Avenue in 1922.^[1]

This was a posthumous presentation, four years after Klimt's death. It introduced an unfinished late canvas through an organisation associated with the Viennese design culture in which his patrons and colleagues had participated.

Exhibition does not establish ownership. The New York branch displayed the work; the source does not say it acquired the canvas or kept it permanently in the United States.

The event belongs to the painting's afterlife because it placed a surface still revealing Klimt's charcoal construction before an American audience unusually early.

Private Ownership and Dated Displays

Current Neue Galerie metadata says “Private Collection.”^[1] A Lentos publication for a 2023 exhibition described a private owner in France, but that is a dated lender statement rather than proof of the exact present location.^[6]

The work appeared at Fondation Beyeler in the Vienna 1900 exhibition of 2010–11, again listed as privately owned and shown courtesy of Neue Galerie New York.^[7] It was also included in Neue Galerie's Austrian Masterworks display from 28 February to 2 September 2019.^[8]

Past loans demonstrate that the painting can enter public exhibitions. They do not create a permanent gallery home or reveal a current owner.

As of 9 August 2026, no continuous public access is established by the sources used here. Anyone hoping to see the canvas should look for a newly announced loan rather than assume it hangs at Neue Galerie.

How to Look at The Dancer

Start at the bottom, not the face. Find the charcoal and comparatively empty support. This is the clearest evidence that the work remained unfinished when Klimt died.

Move upward and watch drawing become paint. Fabric acquires pattern, the torso gains modelling and flowers thicken around the head. The transition is gradual rather than a simple line dividing sketch from completion.

Then locate the bouquet and try to hold the tabletop horizontally. Notice how quickly blossoms connect it with the vertical background and the dancer's clothing.

Finally separate what is known about identity. The visible dancer is institutionally identified as Johanna Jusl; the possible Ria Munk portrait belongs to an earlier, unconfirmed layer of the work's history.

A Transformation Left Open

The Dancer is unfinished, but it is not formless. Klimt established a powerful relation among the standing woman, bouquet, floral aureole and interior before work stopped.

The exposed charcoal lets viewers see construction; the painted upper field shows how completely that construction could be absorbed into colour. The same canvas therefore holds analysis and splendour side by side.

Its possible earlier function deepens that condition. A posthumous portrait may have been transformed into a dancer, yet the evidence does not allow the prior image to replace the visible subject in imagination.

What survives is an open transformation: Johanna Jusl's dancer emerging from paint, Ria Munk remaining a cautious historical possibility beneath or before it, and an interior whose planes keep changing even where Klimt brought them close to resolution.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Accessed August 2026.

1. Neue Galerie New York, “Gustav Klimt, The Dancer (1916–17),” current title/date, unfinished state, oil medium, private ownership, floral/interior description, Ria-reworking theory and 1922 New York exhibition. View source.
2. Neue Galerie New York, “Gustav Klimt,” late unfinished object and charcoal-to-oil working-method account. View source.
3. Albertina, Vienna, “Study for The Dancer (Ria Munk II),” 1916–17 graphite sheet, dimensions, signature, inventory, relationship to reworking and current Johanna Jusl identification. View source.
4. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Final Years,” circa-1916/17 identity, Ria hypothesis with forensic examination pending, late-interior structure and qualified Matisse comparison. View source.
5. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Munks,” Ria Munk commission, 1912 deathbed portrait, Klimt's 1913 likeness difficulty and separate unfinished 1917 third portrait. View source.
6. Lentos Kunstmuseum Linz, The Journey of Paintings room guide, 1916/17 date, 180 × 90-centimetre dimensions, dated private-owner record and Erich Lederer/reworked-portrait evidence at its stated hypothetical level. View source.
7. Fondation Beyeler, Vienna 1900: Klimt, Schiele and Their Times press dossier, circa-1916–18 date convention, oil medium, 180 × 90-centimetre dimensions, private status and 2010–11 loan. View source.
8. Sotheby's Museum Network / Neue Galerie, “Austrian Masterworks from Neue Galerie,” 28 February–2 September 2019 display and comparative charcoal-to-oil description of the late unfinished canvas. View source.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Death and Life

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

The Three Ages of Woman

Water Serpents I