The Park

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About The Park

Gustav Klimt's The Park is Museum of Modern Art object 10.1957, an oil painting measuring 110.4 × 110.4 centimetres. MoMA dates it “1910 or earlier.” Current specialist scholarship uses the more specific 1909 and identifies the setting as the park of Schloss Kammer on the Attersee.^[1][3]

Foliage occupies almost the entire square. Fine touches of green, blue and yellow build a canopy that can seem like a continuous wall, while a near trunk at the right and a dark hedge below resist easy movement into depth. Only a small opening between trunks allows the lake to appear.^[3]

The concise museum title does not make the location generic. Historical evidence uses Schlosspark, and the Gustav Klimt Database calls the canvas Park von Schloss Kammer am Attersee. These are naming layers for one painting, not separate views or states.^[2][3]

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• Current titleThe Park
• Historical titleSchlosspark
• Specialist titlePark von Schloss Kammer am Attersee
• Date“1910 or earlier” in MoMA's current record; 1909 in the Klimt Database
• MaterialsOil on canvas
• Dimensions110.4 × 110.4 centimetres
• SignatureNo exact signature transcription is provided by the current MoMA record
• Object number10.1957
• CreditGertrud A. Mellon Fund
• First documented exhibitionVenice Biennale, 1910
• Museum acquisitionPurchased by MoMA from Galerie St. Etienne in 1957
• Current accessOn view, MoMA Floor 5, as checked 10 August 2026^[1]

From Schlosspark to The Park

MoMA's present title, The Park, is deliberately economical. A label noted when the museum acquired the canvas used the German Schlosspark, meaning castle park. Current Klimt scholarship expands that identification to Park von Schloss Kammer am Attersee—Park of Schloss Kammer on the Attersee.^[2][3]

The changing titles alter the amount of information offered to the viewer, not the physical object. The Park begins with vegetation. Schlosspark establishes a designed estate landscape. The specialist title connects it to a particular castle complex and to Klimt's group of Kammer paintings.

That connection prevents confusion with several nearby works. Pond in the Park of Schloss Kammer is a separate canvas organised around reflective water and bank-side foliage. Avenue to Schloss Kammer is the signed 1912 Belvedere painting in which rows of trees create a forceful approach towards the building. The numbered Schloss Kammer canvases concentrate on façades, water and reflection.

The Park owns a different encounter: the viewer is placed close to vegetation that obstructs rather than announces the estate. The castle itself does not need to appear for the historical park identity to remain meaningful.

Date: 1910 or Earlier, Probably 1909

MoMA currently dates the painting “1910 or earlier.”^[1] The wording gives a secure upper limit without claiming a precisely documented day or season.

The Gustav Klimt Database dates it 1909 and places it with two park subjects made during Klimt's Kammer period. That position is supported by its presentation at the 1910 Venice Biennale and by comparison with the adjacent castle and park works.^[3]

When MoMA announced the acquisition in 1957, it used the broader range “between 1903–1910.” The museum noted that Klimt's landscapes were difficult to date and relied on labels attached to the stretcher for the Venice presentation and Schlosspark title.^[2]

These conventions all concern one canvas. They do not describe an early version, later repainting or duplicate park. The current public baseline should begin with the holder's cautious “1910 or earlier,” then explain why specialists commonly position it in 1909.

No date inscription, technical test or surviving letter retained here fixes the work more narrowly. The first exhibition provides a latest possible date; scholarship supplies the probable chronology.

The MoMA Canvas

The physical object is an oil on canvas measuring 110.4 centimetres in both directions.^[1] Its square is slightly larger in MoMA's exact metric conversion than the rounded 110-centimetre format often associated with Klimt's landscapes.

Object number 10.1957 and the Gertrud A. Mellon Fund credit secure the museum identity. The number joins the canvas to its 1957 acquisition; it is not a Klimt catalogue number or a date embedded in the painting.

MoMA's current public record does not transcribe a signature. This should not be turned into a claim that the work is unsigned. Without an exact institutional or conservation entry, wording and placement should remain unstated.

The listed medium is simply oil on canvas. Blue or yellow highlights are paint effects, not evidence of precious metal. “Mosaic-like” can describe how small marks form a larger visual field, but it does not add glass, stone, gold leaf or another substance.

The museum image supports sustained attention to what is visible. It does not disclose an underdrawing, ground preparation, pigment analysis or hidden first composition. Technical findings published for Avenue to Schloss Kammer belong to that canvas and cannot be transferred here.

A Canopy That Occupies the Square

Most of The Park is foliage. There is no wide sky above it and no distant building to provide an immediate scale. Countless short marks gather into masses whose edges are difficult to isolate.^[1][3]

The canopy is not uniform. Areas of lighter green open against darker passages; blue touches cool and deepen some clusters; yellow marks make others appear lit. Direction and density shift across the surface, preventing the foliage from becoming a mechanically repeated pattern.

From nearby, individual strokes assert themselves. From farther away, they cohere as leaves and crowns. The viewer moves between those two modes without permanently resolving them. Paint remains visible as paint even when the park returns.

The upper field can initially seem almost boundless because no single trunk explains all the foliage. Rather than construct a set of neatly separated trees, Klimt lets neighbouring crowns meet and overlap. Their combined mass is stronger than any one specimen.

This reverses the hierarchy expected from a conventional estate view. The feature that would ordinarily identify the property—the castle—is absent, while its vegetative surround becomes monumental. Even the lake is reduced to a supporting interval. The result is not an anonymous decorative screen, however, because the uneven light, layered trunks and narrow glimpse of water keep returning the painted field to a particular outdoor environment. Recognition arrives through minor spatial clues rather than through a landmark.

This does not make the canvas a botanical inventory. The retained institutional records do not identify every species, count the trees or map their planting. The reader can analyse changes in colour and mark without assigning a name to each leaf.

The Right-Hand Trunk and Lower Hedge

The most forceful solid form stands near the right edge. A trunk rises close to the viewer, cutting across the foliage and marking the near plane. It acts less like a guide into the park than a barrier at its threshold.^[3]

Below the canopy, dark-green shrubs form a hedge-like band. This band blocks an open passage through the lower part of the composition. Trunk and hedge work together: one is vertical and localised, the other horizontal and spread, but both deny effortless recession.

The lower area nevertheless contains enough distinctions to prevent complete closure. Slimmer trunks appear beyond the hedge, and changes in green suggest ground, shadow and intervals between plants. The park has depth, but it must be inferred through obstructions.

This makes the spatial experience unlike the Avenue. In that painting, aligned trunks and a central opening pull the eye forward. Here the near trunk interrupts lateral movement while the hedge arrests entry. One work stages approach; the other stages restricted access.

No psychological code is required. The barrier need not stand for secrecy, anxiety or exclusion in Klimt's private life. Its first significance is pictorial: it keeps a nearly continuous canopy tied to a layered place.

The Small Lake Aperture

Between a few trunks, a light interval reveals the Attersee. The Klimt Database describes the lake as shining through only hesitantly.^[3] Its area is small, but it changes the identity of the entire lower zone.

Without that glimpse, the painting might be read as a dense stand of trees with no geographic clue. The water connects foliage to the Kammer lakeside while simultaneously showing how little of the wider setting Klimt chose to disclose.

The aperture is not a miniature version of On Lake Attersee. It does not turn water into the dominant field or invite analysis of wave, horizon and island. Here water is an interruption within vegetation—a distant cool opening framed by trunks and hedge.

Nor should it become the reflective pond of the separate park painting. The retained specialist identification associates this opening with the lake beyond the trees. Pond in the Park of Schloss Kammer owns the closer encounter between bank foliage and reflective surface.

The small interval helps the canvas hover between surface and scene. It provides atmospheric distance exactly where the surrounding vegetation threatens to eliminate it.

Observation and Ornament

The Klimt Database describes the dense crowns as a vibrating, mosaic-like wall of colour and sees the painting as a union of flat ornament with Impressionist observation.^[3] The formulation is useful because neither term is sufficient alone.

Observation preserves unequal light, irregular clusters, separate trunks and a glimpse of water. Ornament appears in the tendency of small marks to spread across the square and in the way foliage resists conventional modelling.

Calling the work Impressionist without qualification might imply that changing atmospheric light is its only concern. Calling it decorative might ignore how specific spatial cues continue to operate. Klimt uses observed vegetation to create an assertive surface, then uses small breaks in that surface to recover place.

The near approach to abstraction also needs restraint. The upper field can be scanned as blue, green and yellow incidents before it resolves into leaves. Yet trunk, hedge, lake and ground remain active. The painting intensifies ambiguity between representation and surface rather than abandoning representation.

There is no basis for turning each colour into a fixed symbol. Dark green does not automatically mean death, blue spirituality or yellow transcendence. Colour first establishes differences of density, light and distance within the park.

Klimt's Square Viewfinder

MoMA's 2025 label explains that Klimt used a viewfinder made from cardboard with a square opening while working outdoors. The device helped him frame selected portions of the landscape.^[1]

That method provides responsible context for the equal-sided format and radically cropped canopy. It shows how a landscape painter could treat selection itself as a major act rather than merely record a complete panorama.

The label does not establish that the exact surviving cardboard was held at a known point for The Park. No object-specific photograph, marked plan or traced projection is retained. The viewfinder should therefore be presented as documented working practice, not as a mechanical reconstruction of this canvas.

Selection is visible even without recovering the tool. The canopy continues beyond every edge, the near trunk is cut by the frame, and the estate's architecture is excluded. Klimt makes a bounded square feel like one intense portion of a much larger environment.

Schloss Kammer and the Limits of Topography

From 1908 Klimt stayed at Villa Oleander near Kammer and produced several views of Schloss Kammer and its surroundings. The Klimt Database places The Park and Pond in the Park of Schloss Kammer in 1909, alongside his continuing study of the estate and lake.^[3]

Historical Schlosspark evidence secures the general setting. It does not identify the exact trees, hedge or standing point. No retained cadastral plan or contemporary photograph allows the composition to be walked back to one coordinate.

The painting itself makes that limitation unsurprising. It omits the castle and withholds a broad horizon. Vegetation supplies most of the identity, while only the small water interval links it openly to the lakeside.

Claims based on optical devices must also remain separate from nearby works. Scholarship proposes precise distant viewpoints and telescope use for some castle façades. That does not prove a telescope, boat or boathouse position for this close park canopy.

The site is specific enough to distinguish the work and broad enough to preserve uncertainty. Schloss Kammer's park is the subject; a reconstructed footprint is not available.

The Venice Biennale of 1910

MoMA's 1957 acquisition release recorded a label on the stretcher indicating that the painting had been exhibited at the Venice Biennale in 1910.^[2] The current Klimt Database independently identifies Venice as its first presentation.^[3]

The stretcher label is documentary evidence attached to the object. It should not be mistaken for a painted date or title applied by Klimt on the front.

Venice gives the chronology an important boundary. The canvas had to exist by the exhibition, which supports MoMA's “1910 or earlier.” Specialist comparison then places its creation in the preceding summer of 1909.

Klimt's Venice display included landscapes, portraits and allegories. That wider setting can orient the event, but reviews or catalogue remarks about another work cannot be assigned automatically to The Park. Its firm contribution is the identified object and date of public presentation.

From Klimt to Emilie Flöge

MoMA's provenance begins with the artist in Vienna and then Emilie Flöge.^[1] The record does not publish the date or terms of transfer.

It would therefore be unsafe to call the painting a documented gift, inheritance of a specified date or coded statement about their relationship. Ownership is secure; its private meaning remains open.

In 1928 the Neue Galerie in Vienna acquired the canvas from Flöge.^[1] This was the historic Vienna dealership associated with Otto Kallir, not the later New York museum that shares the name.

The 1928 transaction supplies a firm chronological anchor a decade after Klimt's death. MoMA does not state a price or explain whether the gallery acquired the work directly for stock, on behalf of a buyer or under another arrangement. “Acquired” should not be expanded beyond the published chain.

Galerie St. Etienne and MoMA's 1957 Purchase

MoMA next records Galerie St. Etienne in Paris in 1939 and Galerie St. Etienne in New York in 1940.^[1] The entries trace the same gallery enterprise across cities but do not provide shipping details, transaction terms or a stated persecution claim for the painting.

The dates fall within a period of displacement and war, yet chronology alone cannot establish seizure, forced sale or an emergency export. No such mechanism is identified in MoMA's current provenance. The responsible account preserves the listed movement without inventing its circumstances.

The Museum of Modern Art purchased The Park from Galerie St. Etienne in 1957 using the Gertrud A. Mellon Fund.^[1] The work appeared in MoMA's Recent Acquisitions exhibition from November 1957 to January 1958.^[1][2]

The acquisition release recorded the historic title and Venice label while acknowledging uncertainty about date. MoMA's current object page has since refined the physical dimensions and adopted “1910 or earlier,” showing how a museum record can change without changing the canvas.

The 1978 Sale and Repurchase

MoMA's provenance contains an unusual two-step episode. Serge Sabarsky Gallery purchased The Park from the museum in 1978. MoMA then repurchased it from Sabarsky in the same year.^[1]

The current record gives no price, exact interval or reason. It should not be described as a restitution, accidental deaccession, curatorial reversal or financial manoeuvre without direct evidence.

Both transactions matter because they interrupt a simplified claim of continuous MoMA ownership after 1957. They do not imply that two canvases changed hands or that the painting was absent for a long period.

After repurchase, object number 10.1957 continued to identify the work in the collection. The provenance preserves both movements rather than smoothing them into uninterrupted custody.

Current Display at MoMA

MoMA marked The Park “New on view” on Floor 5 when the collection record was checked on 10 August 2026.^[1] That is the strongest current access statement and should remain dated because museum rotations can change.

The object page also identifies the painting in installation photographs from the museum's Vienna Secession presentation, which ran from July 2023 to 16 September 2025, and in earlier collection displays.^[1] Those records document recent visibility but do not replace the live Floor 5 status.

Why The Park Matters

The Park makes a particular landscape almost disappear inside the means used to paint it. A wall of coloured touches dominates, yet the near trunk, lower hedge and small lake opening prevent complete detachment from place.

Its title history follows the same movement between general and specific. MoMA's The Park invites direct looking; Schlosspark and Park von Schloss Kammer am Attersee restore the estate and lakeside context. None is sufficient alone.

The chronology also rewards graded certainty. Venice in 1910 is documented by the stretcher label. MoMA responsibly says “1910 or earlier.” Specialist research makes 1909 the most persuasive working date without turning it into an inscription.

The ownership chain is unusually clear in outline and appropriately restrained in detail: Klimt, Emilie Flöge, Neue Galerie Vienna, Galerie St. Etienne in Paris and New York, MoMA, a brief Sabarsky transaction and MoMA again. The missing terms should remain missing.

What holds the canvas together is not a secret programme but a visual problem. The viewer faces foliage that seems closed, searches its shifting marks, and finally discovers just enough water and depth to recognise the park beyond the surface.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

1. Museum of Modern Art, “Gustav Klimt, The Park, 1910 or earlier,” object 10.1957; current title, date, medium, dimensions, fund credit, 2025 viewfinder label, installation history, complete published provenance and dated Floor 5 display. View source. Accessed 10 August 2026.
2. Museum of Modern Art, “Recent Acquisitions,” press release, 1957; broad historical dating, Schlosspark label and stretcher-label evidence for the 1910 Venice Biennale. View source. Accessed 10 August 2026.
3. Gustav Klimt Database, “Gustav Klimt at His Zenith: 1907–1909,” section “Views of Kammer Castle on the Attersee”; specialist 1909 date, Park von Schloss Kammer am Attersee identity, canopy/trunk/hedge/lake analysis, adjacent park-pond distinction and first presentation in Venice. View source. Accessed 10 August 2026.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Death and Life

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

The Three Ages of Woman

Water Serpents I