Angelus Novus Paul Klee Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Published on June 19, 2020 / Updated on September 27, 2026
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

The 1920 picture and its later meanings

The figure looks straight out at us. Its broad head seems almost too large for its narrow body. Curved marks rise around the face; short arms or wings open at either side; birdlike feet rest below. Its mouth appears parted enough to show teeth. Paul Klee called this small work Angelus novus, a “new angel,” in 1920. Twenty years later Walter Benjamin would describe an “angel of history” looking back at catastrophe while a storm drives him toward the future. Benjamin was looking at Klee’s image, but the historical vision was Benjamin’s. To understand the work, we have to see the 1920 object before reading the 1940 text into every line.[1][2][3]

The picture has a second, less immediately visible life. Its surface is an oil-transfer drawing worked with watercolour. It was mounted over an older printed portrait whose edges still show. It travelled from a Munich dealer to Benjamin’s rooms, into exile, through a disputed wartime custody, to Gershom Scholem and the Israel Museum. Its fragility means that a reproduction has sometimes stood where viewers expected the original. Each part of that story changes what a viewer can reasonably claim to see. None supplies a simple answer to what Klee intended his angel to mean.[1][4][5]

Explore the details of Angelus Novus

Select a numbered area to examine its detail at high resolution.

Numbered guide to 5 visual details in Angelus Novus 1 2 3 4 5
1

Curled lines above the head

Detail 1: Curled lines above the head in Angelus Novus
2

Eyes and central face

Detail 2: Eyes and central face in Angelus Novus
3

Two raised hands

Detail 3: Two raised hands in Angelus Novus
4

Angular body and feet

Detail 4: Angular body and feet in Angelus Novus
5

Artist inscription and mount

Detail 5: Artist inscription and mount in Angelus Novus

Contents

  1. What is the work?
  2. Look at the angel before giving it a mission
  3. A portrait concealed in the mount
  4. Why Benjamin bought it
  5. The angel of history belongs to 1940
  6. Exile and a disputed route to Jerusalem
  7. Originals, facsimiles and changing audiences
  8. Seeing the picture again

What is the work?

The Israel Museum in Jerusalem identifies the work as oil transfer and watercolour on paper, 31.8 × 24.2 cm, inventory B87.0994. Klee’s annual work designation is 1920, 32, repeated by the Jewish Museum in New York. This is a work on paper, not an oil painting on canvas, nor an edition of prints. The Israel Museum credits its 1987 gift to Fania and Gershom Scholem and additional donors named in the institutional record.[1][6]

Its small scale matters. A visitor does not confront a monumental, winged being across a gallery. The figure occupies a sheet that can be held, mounted, moved and, as Benjamin did, hung in a room. The pale colour does not fill a grand heavenly background. Irregular dark edges and a fairly spare ground keep our attention near the inked form. The Jewish Museum’s audio description notices the wavering black outlines, large head and wings ending in almost handlike points. The visible features invite human and animal comparisons, but do not settle into either anatomy. The feet can seem avian; the wings can also seem raised arms. Teeth complicate any expectation of a serene guardian.[3][6]

Oil transfer explains why the line has a different character from a conventional ink drawing. Klee could place an oil- or ink-coated intermediate sheet between a model and the final support, then trace with a point. Pressure transferred pigment to the paper beneath, making both intended contour and incidental marks possible. Watercolour added another register of colour to the transferred line. This general account of Klee’s method is supported by MoMA’s technical discussion of his transfer drawings; the Israel Museum’s object label fixes the media for this sheet. Without a full object-level conservation report, the exact order and composition of every layer should not be reconstructed as fact.[1][7]

There is a separate pencil drawing of a similar bird-footed creature. In a 2026 lecture description, art historian Annie Bourneuf and the Jewish Museum distinguish that drawing, which Klee kept, from the oil-transfer and watercolour work he sent to an early solo exhibition. The two images are relevant to one another, but they are not two records of the same physical sheet. The famous Angelus novus bought by Benjamin is the watercolour and transfer drawing now held by the Israel Museum.[8]

Look at the angel before giving it a mission

The angel’s face is hard to make stable. Bätschmann describes the proportions as almost childlike and notices the exposed teeth; Bredekamp draws attention to the birdlike feet and scrolls of hair. These are observations and close readings by art historians, not words Klee wrote below the picture. The outline seems at once decorative and unsettled. Where does a wing end and a hand begin? Are the eyes startled, fixed, curious or simply made round by a few lines? The title gives the creature a name but no episode, destination or historical task.[2][3]

Benjamin’s celebrated description selected certain features: eyes, open mouth and spread wings. It did not record the feet, teeth or the paper’s material construction in the same way. His selective act is one reason the image became so productive for philosophy. A viewer can ask what the figure appears to look at, but the sheet does not paint a field of rubble before it. The ruins enter Benjamin’s prose. Likewise, the angel’s direction of travel, its wish to repair what has been destroyed and the storm named “progress” are not mechanically readable from Klee’s watercolour. They are the force of Benjamin’s argument.[2][3][9]

The distinction also protects the art from a retrospective biography of its maker. There is no established evidence that the figure portrays Hitler or records a specific episode of Klee’s depression. A Berlin museum’s 2008 press notice records that one interpretation in an exhibition saw a Hitler allegory; that is evidence of a later reading, without identifying Klee’s intention or supplying proof of a portrait. Klee’s angels can be playful, strange, vulnerable or threatening across his wider practice, and no single character should be imposed on this one without an argument.[2][10]

A portrait concealed in the mount

The dark material seen around the angel is connected to a remarkable physical discovery. Israel Museum conservator Michael Maggen reported that Klee mounted the sheet over another print, leaving only margins visible. Tests with infrared reflectography and thermography did not identify the buried image. The artist R. H. Quaytman compared the exposed parts with candidate engravings and matched them to Friedrich Müller’s 1838 engraving after Lucas Cranach the Elder’s portrait of Martin Luther. The full engraving was not exposed by taking the object apart. The identification comes from the surviving visible edges and comparison, not a claim that the complete print can be seen beneath the angel with the naked eye.[4][5]

Bourneuf’s account describes a three-part stack: the paper bearing Klee’s angel; the larger engraving to which that sheet was glued; and the cardboard with Klee’s date and title. At the margins, features such as robes, a date and an interlocked monogram helped Quaytman find the print. That makes the mount part of the object’s history, not a neutral modern border. It also opens questions that remain questions. Why would Klee choose a nineteenth-century reproductive engraving after a sixteenth-century Protestant portrait? Did its subject matter matter to him, or was the sheet useful as a support with suggestive visible details? Bourneuf connects the construction to debates about religious images after the First World War. That is an art-historical interpretation, not proof of a private intention of Klee’s.[4][5]

Benjamin’s later writing on religion and history makes the Luther portrait especially tempting to interpret. That temptation is not evidence he identified it. Wizisla, writing in the 2025 Berlin exhibition volume, cautions against assuming Benjamin knew the concealed image. The mount and the 1940 thesis can be studied together as later viewers have done, but the documentation presently examined does not make the hidden portrait a coded message to Benjamin.[5][11]

Why Benjamin bought it

Benjamin was interested in Klee before he owned Angelus novus. Taisa Palhares and Bätschmann draw on a letter to Scholem recording that Benjamin’s wife Dora gave him a different Klee work, Vorführung des Wunders, in July 1920. The later purchase was not his first encounter with Klee’s art. In late May 1921 Benjamin bought Angelus novus for 1,000 marks from dealer Hans Goltz in Munich. Klee and Benjamin did not meet, according to the Zentrum Paul Klee; what Klee thought of Benjamin’s later interpretations is unknown.[2][6][12]

Goltz had shown the work in 1920 without selling it. Benjamin left the newly bought sheet temporarily with Gershom Scholem in Munich. Völlnagel dates its move into Benjamin’s Berlin room to November 1921. A small mounted work could therefore become an everyday presence rather than an object seen only once at an exhibition. Scholem wrote a poem called “Gruß vom Angelus” for Benjamin, and a stanza of it later appeared above thesis IX. The poem’s angel is Scholem’s address to a friend; it is not a signed explanation from Klee.[11][13]

Benjamin considered naming a journal Angelus Novus. His German prospectus, drafted around 1922, envisaged poetry, philosophy, criticism and translation. It sought a kind of attention that could find a historical substance beneath short-lived novelty. Toward its close, Benjamin related the journal’s name to a Talmudic story of angels created for an instant and then disappearing. The projected periodical did not appear. The prospectus even notes that a journal’s physical form cannot directly present visual art; it is not a programme Klee wrote for this picture.[9][14]

Benjamin’s relation to the image changed over time. In his 1931 essay on Karl Kraus, the “new angel” enters a meditation on destruction and humanity. In his 1933 autobiographical writing Agesilaus Santander, composed after he had fled Germany, the figure hanging in the Berlin room becomes bound to separation and his own future. Bätschmann follows these phases in detail, and Rowley stresses that the 1933 angel was a picture Benjamin no longer had before his eyes. It would be misleading to read the 1940 thesis back into the 1921 purchase as if Benjamin had already formulated one permanent interpretation.[2][13][15]

The angel of history belongs to 1940

Benjamin wrote the text usually known as Über den Begriff der Geschichte (On the Concept of History) in 1939–40, under the pressure of war, fascism and exile. Thesis IX begins with Scholem’s verse. Benjamin then invokes a Klee picture and describes an angel who looks as if he is about to move away from something on which his gaze remains fixed. What we call a sequence of events becomes, for this figure, a single accumulating catastrophe. He would like to pause, wake the dead and repair the wreckage, but a storm catches in his wings and drives him into the future. Benjamin names that storm “progress.” The last phrase is central to his attack on reassuring accounts of history, not an art-historical caption for Klee’s studio intentions.[9][11]

The thesis gains force in the company of the surrounding theses. Benjamin is arguing over how history is told, whose suffering gets erased, and whether a comfortable belief in progress makes catastrophe easier to accept. Bredekamp emphasizes that Benjamin’s image is selective: Klee’s birdlike feet, teeth and hair have no explanatory role in thesis IX. The philosopher took a particular pictured figure and made it serve a historical argument. The picture did not have to contain a literal storm or ruins for that transformation to work. Conversely, noticing what he left out lets us return to Klee’s difficult little figure with fresh eyes.[3][9][11]

There are more speculative connections. Bredekamp proposes lines to earlier imagery of the winged eye and to the experience of aerial catastrophe; Bätschmann suggests relations with other Klee angels and even possible later artistic responses to Benjamin. Such proposals may illuminate how particular scholars read the work. They do not show that Klee deliberately painted Benjamin’s 1940 philosophy in 1920. Nor should the material interleaf be made the secret source of a thesis without evidence that Benjamin identified it.[2][3][5]

Exile and a disputed route to Jerusalem

Benjamin left Berlin in March 1933 after the Nazi rise to power, leaving the picture behind. Rowley says an unidentified friend brought it to him in Paris around 1935. The identity of the courier is not established in the account read here. On 27 July 1932, Benjamin had named Scholem as the future recipient of the work in a letter-like testament. Yet by 1939, poverty and the need to escape Europe led him to contemplate selling it to help pay for travel to the United States. Wizisla quotes his calculation of what the Klee could fetch against the cost of a passage. The sale did not occur. These documents show both attachment and the practical pressure of exile; they should not be flattened into a story of an artwork always meant to remain untouched.[11][13]

After Benjamin’s death at Portbou in September 1940, the exact wartime custody is disputed. A familiar account places the sheet with Georges Bataille and Pierre Missac among material protected in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris, then has Missac bring it to Theodor Adorno in New York in early 1947. Völlnagel presents that route cautiously, and Berlin museum material also names Bataille, Missac and Adorno. But Wizisla reports Rolf Tiedemann’s account that Gretel and Theodor Adorno repeatedly said Benjamin’s sister Dora arranged its delivery to them in 1941. If that recollection is accurate, the sheet may never have been in the Bibliothèque Nationale cache. Both variants cannot be treated as a single documented itinerary. The original letters or transfer records required to resolve them have not been examined here.[10][11]

The firm later anchors are clearer. Adorno fulfilled Benjamin’s wish that Scholem receive the picture. It reached Jerusalem, where Scholem and his wife Fania lived. Völlnagel dates its first Israel Museum display to 1982 and its transfer to the museum to 1987, after Scholem’s death; the owning museum identifies the 1987 gift and donor credit. Palhares gives 1972 for the sheet’s arrival in Jerusalem, a date worth checking against original correspondence. We can therefore say the Israel Museum holds it, without saying it is continuously on view there. A light-sensitive drawing may be stored, loaned briefly or represented by a facsimile.[1][5][11][16]

Originals, facsimiles and changing audiences

The original has travelled, but exceptionally. During a 2008–09 Berlin exhibition, the museum announced that the original returned to Jerusalem on 5 January 2009 for conservation and a facsimile replaced it. In 2025, the Israel Museum lent it to the Bode-Museum in Berlin for an exhibition marking eighty years since the end of the Second World War, shown from 8 May to 13 July. Those are documented loans, not proof that the work is normally on view in either city.[10][17]

The distinction became unusually visible in New York in 2026. The Jewish Museum’s exhibition opened on 20 March with an authorised copy because transport of the original was delayed. Its contemporaneous label said so plainly. Reporting in May indicates that the original subsequently arrived and was installed; a July account describes visiting after it had replaced the copy. The exact installation date remains to be established. That sequence matters more than an easy statement that “the original was in New York” for the entire run. Bourneuf’s lecture for the museum placed facsimiles and the protected original at the centre of her discussion of this artwork’s doubles. The famous image has circulated widely, while the paper object must be guarded against light and travel.[5][6][8][18]

Seeing the picture again

Read thesis IX, then look back at Klee’s sheet. Benjamin’s image of historical wreckage is hard to forget; that is part of its importance. But the eyes, teeth, feet, marks and layered paper still ask questions the thesis does not answer. We can watch a 1920 object become Benjamin’s treasured possession, a journal emblem, an exile’s possible means of escape, a philosophical figure and a museum object. Those later roles are real. They need not cancel the peculiar, undecided angel Klee made.[2][3][9]

For the method of the transferred line, see Klee’s materials and techniques and the drawings overview. The biography gives the artist’s 1920 context. Klee’s late work belongs to a different period; its political circumstances should not be presumed to explain this early angel.

Explore selected works from Klee’s much larger oeuvre. Titles without a link have an authenticated catalogue identity but no reviewed article yet.

Artworks directory

217 artworks

NameDateMedium
A Gate1939Painting and mixed media
A Woman for Gods1938Watercolour and mixed media
Ab Ovo1917Watercolour and mixed media
Above Mountain Summit1917Drawing and mixed media
Abstract Trio1923Drawing and mixed media
Acrobats1915Watercolour and mixed media
Actor's Mask1924Painting and mixed media
Ad Marginem1930Drawing and mixed media
Ad Parnassum1932Painting and mixed media
Adventurer Ship1927Drawing and mixed media
Affected Place1922Drawing and mixed media
After a Sketch from Zurich1914Watercolour and mixed media
After Drawing1919Print
After The Floods1936Watercolour and mixed media
All Souls' Picture1921Print
Ancient Harmony1925Painting and mixed media
Angel Applicant1939Drawing and mixed media
Angel Serves the Desired1920Print
Angel, Still Female1939Painting and mixed media
Angelus Novus1920Drawing and mixed media
Animal Terror1926Painting and mixed media
Arab Song1932Painting and mixed media
Archangel1938Painting and mixed media
Architecture1923Painting and mixed media
Architecture of the Plain1923Drawing and mixed media
Around the Fish1926Painting and mixed media
Arrival of the Air Steamer1921Drawing and mixed media
Asiatic God1924Painting and mixed media
Astrological Fantasy Portrait1924Drawing and mixed media
Athlete's Head1932Watercolour and mixed media
Aufgehender Stern1931Painting and mixed media
Autumn Flower1922Painting and mixed media
Bad Band1920Drawing and mixed media
Baroque Centaur1939Painting and mixed media
Before the Blitz1923Drawing and mixed media
Before the Snow1929Drawing and mixed media
Besessenes Madchen1924Watercolour and mixed media
Bird Garden1924Print
Bird Wandering Off1926Watercolour and mixed media
Blossoms in the Night1930Watercolour and mixed media
Blue-Bird-Pumpkin1939Painting and mixed media
Boats in the Flood1937Painting and mixed media
Botanical Theatre1934Drawing and mixed media
Boy in Fancy Dress1931Watercolour and mixed media
Broken Key1938Print
Brother and Sister1930Watercolour and mixed media
But the Red Roof1935Painting and mixed media
C - C = Fisch1931Watercolour and mixed media
Cacti1912Painting and mixed media
Camel (in Rhythmic Landscape with Trees)1920Drawing and mixed media
Captive Pierrot1923Drawing and mixed media
Castle and Sun1928Drawing and mixed media
Cat and Bird1928Drawing and mixed media
Cathedrals1925Watercolour and mixed media
Chalice of the Heart1937Painting and mixed media
Characters in Yellow1937Painting and mixed media
Chosen Site1927Mixed media
Christmas Picture1923Drawing and mixed media
City of Towers1916Painting and mixed media
Clarification1932Painting and mixed media
Collection of Figurines1926Painting and mixed media
Colorful Architecture1917Painting and mixed media
Comedians' Handbill1938Print
Comic Opera Singer1927Painting and mixed media
Composition1939Painting and mixed media
Composition with Figures1915Drawing and mixed media
Composition with the Yellow Half-Moon and the Y1918Watercolour and mixed media
Conch–Still Life II1939Watercolour and mixed media
Cosmic Composition1919Painting and mixed media
Crystal Gradation1921Drawing and mixed media
Dance of the Grieving Child1922Painting and mixed media
Dancing Girl1940Painting and mixed media
Das Licht und Etliches1931Mixed media
Death and Fire1940Painting and mixed media
Death for the Idea1915Print
Demon as Pirate1926Watercolour and mixed media
Diana1931Painting and mixed media
Diavolo Player1923Drawing and mixed media
Die Kapelle1917Watercolour and mixed media
Die Vase1938Painting and mixed media
Doctor1930Drawing and mixed media
Dredger and Sailboat1931Watercolour and mixed media
Ein Tor1939Painting and mixed media
Ein Weib fur Gotter1938Mixed media
Embrace1939Watercolour and mixed media
Episode before an Arab Town1923Print
Equals Infinity1932Painting and mixed media
Eros1923Drawing and mixed media
Error on Green1930Watercolour and mixed media
Evening Figure1935Drawing and mixed media
Falling Bird1919Print
Fermata1932Watercolour and mixed media
Fire Clown1921Watercolour and mixed media
Fire Full Moon1933Watercolour and mixed media
Fire in the Evening1929Painting and mixed media
Fish in the Harbour1916Watercolour and mixed media
Fish Magic1925Watercolour and mixed media
Flock of Birds1917Drawing and mixed media
Flora on Sand1927Watercolour and mixed media
Flower Myth1918Print
Flower Stand with Watering Can and Bucket1910Watercolour and mixed media
Flowering Tree (Abstraction with Reference to a Flowering Tree)1925Painting and mixed media
Flowers in Pots1923Print
Flowers in Stone1939Painting and mixed media
Forest Witch1938Painting and mixed media
Fright of a Girl1922Drawing and mixed media
Fruits on Red1930Drawing and mixed media
Full Moon1919Mixed media
Föhn Wind in Franz Marc's Garden1915Watercolour and mixed media
Garden in St Germain, The European Quarter near Tunis1914Watercolour and mixed media
Ghost Chamber with the Tall Door (New Version)1925Print
Ghost of a Genius1922Drawing and mixed media
Girl in Mourning1939Painting and mixed media
Glance of a Landscape1926Watercolour and mixed media
Gluht Nach1939Drawing and mixed media
Golden Fish1925Watercolour and mixed media
Goldfish Wife1921Watercolour and mixed media
Green Plant, Blood, Louse1924Drawing and mixed media
Hafenbild1918Mixed media
Hammamet with Mosque1914Watercolour and mixed media
Harbour with Sailing Ships1937Painting and mixed media
Hauptweg und Nebenwege1929Painting and mixed media
Heavenly and Earthly Time1927Drawing and mixed media
Heroic Fiddling1938Painting and mixed media
Heroic Roses1938Painting and mixed media
Heroic Strokes of the Bow—Mixed media
Highway and Byways1929Drawing and mixed media
Houses near the Gravel Pit1913Watercolour and mixed media
Howling Dog1928Painting and mixed media
In the Current Six Thresholds1929Painting and mixed media
In the Style of Kairouan1914Drawing and mixed media
Individualized Altimetry of Stripes1930Painting and mixed media
Insula Dulcamara1938Print
Interior with the Clock1913Watercolour and mixed media
Irma Rossa the Animal Tamer1918Drawing and mixed media
Journey in Corsica1927Drawing and mixed media
Landscape with Bluebirds1919Watercolour and mixed media
Legend of the Nile1937Painting and mixed media
Lemon Harvest1937Watercolour and mixed media
Likeness in the Bower1930Watercolour and mixed media
Limits of Reason1927Painting and mixed media
Little Hope1938Watercolour and mixed media
Magdalena before the Conversion1938Drawing and mixed media
Mask of Fear1932Painting and mixed media
May Picture1925Painting and mixed media
Monument in a Cemetery1922Watercolour and mixed media
Monuments at G1929Watercolour and mixed media
Municipal Jewel1917Watercolour and mixed media
Mural from the Temple of Longing Thither1922Print
Nach der Uberschwemmung1936Watercolour and mixed media
New Harmony1936Painting and mixed media
New House in the Suburbs—Mixed media
Old Steamboat1922Drawing and mixed media
On the Edge1930Drawing and mixed media
Once Emerged from the Gray of Night1918Drawing and mixed media
One Who Understands1934Painting and mixed media
Oriental Pleasure Garden1925Painting and mixed media
Park of Idols1939Watercolour and mixed media
Passing by Red Pillars1928Watercolour and mixed media
Persian Nightingales1917Drawing and mixed media
Popular Wall Painting1922Painting and mixed media
Prestidigitator1927Watercolour and mixed media
Rainy Day1931Watercolour and mixed media
Red and White Domes1914Watercolour and mixed media
Red Balloon1922Drawing and mixed media
Redgreen and Violet-Yellow Rhythms1920Drawing and mixed media
Refuge1930Watercolour and mixed media
Rhythmic Rythmical1930Painting and mixed media
Saint of the Inner Light1921Print
Scaffolding of a New Building1930Painting and mixed media
Scholar in Dealing with Stars1926Watercolour and mixed media
Seated Woman1930Drawing and mixed media
Senecio1922Painting and mixed media
Separation in the Evening1922Drawing and mixed media
Sinbad the Sailor1923Drawing and mixed media
Skeptically Smiling—Mixed media
Small House in the Garden City1928Watercolour and mixed media
Small Portrait of a Girl in Yellow1925Painting and mixed media
Southern Gardens1919Watercolour and mixed media
Static-Dynamic Gradation1923Drawing and mixed media
Still Life1927Painting and mixed media
Still Life with Gladioli1932Watercolour and mixed media
Strange Garden1923Drawing and mixed media
Stricken City1936Painting and mixed media
Strong Dream1929Watercolour and mixed media
Struck from the List1933Drawing and mixed media
Structural I1924Drawing and mixed media
Sumpflegende1919Painting and mixed media
Temple Gardens1920Drawing and mixed media
The Arrow before the Target1921Drawing and mixed media
The Barbed Noose with the Mice1923Watercolour and mixed media
The Flora of the Heath1925Watercolour and mixed media
The Goldfish1925Watercolour and mixed media
The Hour Before One Night1940Painting and mixed media
The Man in Love1923Print
The Mask with the Flag1925Mixed media
The Pathos of Fertility1921Print
The Rhine at Duisburg1937Painting and mixed media
The Way to the Citadel1937Painting and mixed media
Three Houses and a Bridge1922Watercolour and mixed media
Tightrope Walker1923Print
Tomb in Three Parts1923Watercolour and mixed media
Tomcat's Turf1919Watercolour and mixed media
Tower in Orange and Green1922Drawing and mixed media
Tree and Architecture - Rhythms I1920Watercolour and mixed media
Tree and Architecture - Rhythms II1920Painting and mixed media
Tropical Dawn with the Owl1921Mixed media
Tropische Dammerung1921Painting and mixed media
Twittering Machine1922Drawing and mixed media
Variations (Progressive Motif)1927Watercolour and mixed media
Ventriloquist and Crier in the Moor1923Print
Viaducts Break Ranks1937Drawing and mixed media
Villa R1919Painting and mixed media
Village Carnival1926Painting and mixed media
Vor dem Blitz1923Drawing and mixed media
Wald-Hexen1938Painting and mixed media
Young Forest1925Drawing and mixed media

Discussion

Klee's picture and Benjamin's later angel of history do different work.

The physical mount and the disputed custody history open further questions.

Reader Insights

Close Looking

Which visible features of Klee's angel did Benjamin select or leave aside?

Context

What evidence would help settle its wartime journey?

Open Question

How does knowing about the hidden print affect your reading of the mount?

Join the Conversation

Share the details or sources behind your reading.

References

  1. Israel Museum, From Picasso to Kentridge exhibition catalogue, pp. 26–27, object record B87.0994 (English), catalogue PDF, View source.
  2. Oskar Bätschmann, “Angelus Novus und ‘Engel der Geschichte’: Paul Klee und Walter Benjamin,” in Engel, Teufel und Dämonen (2006), 225–42 (German), full essay, View source.
  3. Horst Bredekamp, “Walter Benjamins Engel der Geschichte und Albertis Flugauge,” in Der Engel der Geschichte (2025), 24–31 (German), full chapter, View source.
  4. Michael Maggen, “Paul Klee’s Angelus Novus: Understanding the Artistic Technique,” conservation conference abstract (2016; English), abstract, View source.
  5. Annie Bourneuf, “Behind the Angel of History,” interview, Journal of the History of Ideas Blog (4 September 2023; English), interview. Her full 2022 book has not yet been read for this page, View source.
  6. Jewish Museum, Paul Klee: Other Possible Worlds (2026), exhibition page, checklist, audio description transcript (English).
  7. Museum of Modern Art, Paul Klee Centennial: Prints and Transfer Drawings (1979), 8–9, technical account of oil transfer (English), catalogue PDF, View source.
  8. Jewish Museum, “Of Angels and Doubles: Paul Klee’s Angelus Novus from Berlin to Jerusalem,” lecture description for Annie Bourneuf, 4 June 2026 (English), museum page, View source.
  9. Walter Benjamin, Über den Begriff der Geschichte, especially theses VII–X, original German text (1940), Zurich University of the Arts hosted scan. The scan’s OCR contains errors; the account above paraphrases the passage, View source.
  10. Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, press notice on the 2008–09 Angelus novus exhibition, including original/facsimile exchange and range of interpretations (German), notice PDF, View source.
  11. Erdmut Wizisla, “Die Tore des Paradieses öffnen sich nach außen,” in Der Engel der Geschichte (2025), 32–41 (German), full chapter; Jörg Völlnagel, “Wenn Engel reisen...,” ibid., 42–53, full chapter. Their custody chronologies conflict.
  12. Zentrum Paul Klee, “Cover Star Klee,” institutional guide (German; also available in English and French), German page, English page.
  13. Neville Rowley, “Der Engel der Geschichte,” in Der Engel der Geschichte (2025), 8–23 (German), full chapter, View source.
  14. Walter Benjamin, “Ankündigung der Zeitschrift Angelus Novus,” German transcription (1922), text; University of Turin, CoSMo, study of the unrealised journal. Text transcription not yet checked against critical print edition.
  15. Oskar Bätschmann, cited at 2; Neville Rowley, cited at 13. Both distinguish Benjamin’s earlier uses of the image from thesis IX.
  16. Taisa Palhares, “Walter Benjamin and the New Angel,” in Paul Klee, Centro Cultural Banco do Brasil exhibition catalogue, printed 276–81 / PDF 140–42 (Portuguese and English), bilingual catalogue, View source.
  17. Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, “The Angel of History,” Bode-Museum exhibition, 8 May–13 July 2025 (English), museum page, View source.
  18. Jewish Museum, March 2026 exhibition-copy label, PDF p. 28; ARTnews Japan, 12 May 2026 arrival report (Japanese); Jewish Currents, 21 July 2026 account (English).