Bust of a Lady

Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

About Bust of a Lady

Gustav Klimt's Bust of a Lady is small enough to be held in two hands, yet its face has the concentrated force of a public image. The woman looks outward from a field of finely worked hair and broad folds. White vertical hatching crosses the pale face; blue sharpens the pupils and shadows; red isolates the slightly open mouth; brown, black and white construct the surrounding garment. Sparse colour does not decorate a finished outline. It determines how the head advances and withdraws.^[1]

Exact identification matters because the title is generic. The work discussed here is the 1897/98 drawing Damenbrustbild von vorne, catalogue number Strobl 3318. It measures 45 by 32 centimetres and is made with brown, black, red and blue chalk on paper, heightened with white. It is not either of the later frontal female busts sold under nearly identical German and English titles by Christie's and Sotheby's.^[1][5][6]

The sitter is unknown, and no need exists to invent her. This is an autonomous portrait drawing rather than a documented study for a painting. Its history—from Anton Loew's direct acquisition, through a Koloman Moser-designed bedroom ensemble, later folding and restoration, a provenance settlement and a 2019 auction—shows how an unnamed face could become a carefully valued independent object.^[1][2][4]

At a Glance

• ArtistGustav Klimt
• Exact German titleDamenbrustbild von vorne
• Common English titleBust of a Lady
• Date1897/98
• Object typeAutonomous portrait drawing
• MediumBrown, black, red and blue chalk on paper, heightened with white
• Dimensions45 × 32 centimetres
• Catalogue numberAlice Strobl 3318
• SitterUnidentified
• Early ownerDr Anton Loew, acquired directly from Klimt
• Later interiorOne of six Klimt drawings framed for the Eisler-Terramare bedroom designed by Koloman Moser
• ConservationRestored in 2016 to its original unfolded sheet size
• Recent saleIm Kinsky, Vienna, lot 426, 17 June 2019
• 2019 result€712,000 including fees and Austrian VAT; hammer/highest bid €560,000
• Current accessBuyer, present location and public display not confirmed as of 9 August 2026^[1][2]

Which Bust of a Lady?

This object is secured by four linked facts: 1897/98, Strobl 3318, a 45-by-32-centimetre sheet and the four coloured chalks heightened with white. Im Kinsky published those details when the drawing appeared as lot 426 in June 2019.^[1]

Its German title means a bust portrait of a lady seen from the front. English sources might shorten that to Bust of a Lady, Bust Portrait of a Lady from the Front or Portrait of a Lady, Frontal View. Translation changes do not create another object, but the words alone cannot identify this sheet.

Christie's, for example, catalogued a different Brustbild einer Dame von vorne around 1916–17. That later work is pencil on simili Japan paper, measures 57 by 37.3 centimetres and bears the catalogue number Strobl 3707. It once belonged to Klimt's brother Georg before entering another private chain.^[5]

Sotheby's listed yet another Brustbild einer Dame von vorne (Portrait of a Lady, Frontal View) as lot 3 in a London evening sale in February 2009. The title's reappearance in a separate auction is enough to demonstrate the danger of relying on translation without date, medium or catalogue number.^[6]

The 1897/98 sheet is therefore neither a late pencil drawing nor a fragment of an unfinished portrait painting. Its coloured-chalk material, Loew provenance and early Secession-era handling give it a distinct identity.

The Exact Sheet and Its Materials

Im Kinsky describes brown, black, red and blue chalk on paper, heightened with white. Every part of that formulation is object-specific. The support is paper, not canvas. The drawing is not generally catalogued as an oil, watercolour or gold work. Its white is applied heightening, not untouched paper alone.^[1]

The combination matters because Klimt did not use all four colours evenly. Brown lays in portions of the outer garment. Black and blue articulate shadow. Red concentrates the mouth. Blue makes the pupils unexpectedly acute. White travels across face, hair and folded cloth in different scales.^[1]

The auction essay calls brown chalk comparatively unusual in Klimt's practice. That observation belongs to this early drawing and its immediate context; it should not be turned into a lifetime rule that he never used brown elsewhere.

Colour also remains drawing rather than paint pretending to be precious material. No gold leaf, silver, platinum, textile attachment or jewel is identified. The sheet generates intensity through chalk, pressure, overlap and exposed support.

Forty-Five by Thirty-Two, Not Two Versions

The present dimensions are 45 by 32 centimetres. Alice Strobl's catalogue had recorded 41 by 28.5 centimetres because it measured the opening of a former passepartout after the sheet edges had been folded inward during reframing.^[1]

Conservation in 2016 reopened those folds and returned the work to its original full size. The larger measurement does not describe an addition, reconstructed border or second drawing. It describes more of the same physical sheet becoming visible again.^[1]

This distinction changes how the image is seen. A mat opening can tighten the field around a face and suppress the relation between head, garment and paper edge. Recovering the full dimensions restores breathing room and shows more clearly how broadly the outer chalk lines spread around the central visage.

The conservation history is also evidence of changing use. A sheet first valued as an autonomous image later became part of an interior, was reframed and folded, and eventually returned to a fuller presentation. Its material life did not stop when Klimt finished drawing.

An Unidentified Woman

No current object record names the sitter. “Lady” is a catalogue category, not a recovered social identity. The drawing does not establish whether she commissioned the work, belonged to Klimt's patronage circle or posed as a professional model.^[1]

Im Kinsky's scholarship places the sheet among autonomous female portrait drawings in which many women remain unknown. It argues that Klimt explored types, character and atmosphere rather than pursuing only the named identities familiar from his large society portraits.^[1]

That account should not erase the represented person's specificity. Unknown to today's catalogue is not the same as imaginary, interchangeable or unimportant. Particular decisions—the parted mouth, fixed pupils, hair arrangement and layered clothing—produce a singular presence even when biography is missing.

Nor can the face support a private diagnosis. Words such as hypnotic, melancholy or introspective appear in scholarship around related Symbolist types, but the woman's mental state cannot be read securely from frontal pose and large eyes. The drawing controls our encounter; it does not disclose her inner life.

A Face Made Both Flat and Luminous

The head is almost rigidly frontal. Instead of using smooth tonal modelling to build a rounded face, Klimt places fine white vertical strokes across the light surface. These marks illuminate while also reminding the viewer that the face is a worked plane.^[1]

Blue accents in the pupils intensify the outward look. They are tiny in area but decisive because the rest of the face is comparatively pale. Black and blue hatching presses into shadow around the features, while the red mouth makes a second point of colour below.^[1]

The resulting expression feels immediate because the eyes and mouth are so precisely located. At the same time, the vertical hatching prevents illusion from becoming seamless. We see a woman and a structure of chalk marks together.

This tension belongs to Klimt's changing portrait language in the later 1890s. Likeness remains possible, but it no longer requires every surface to imitate flesh continuously. Linear rhythm can create presence as strongly as conventional shading.

Hair, Wrap and Enclosure

A large, finely structured mass of hair surrounds the face. Its accumulated lines differ from the more widely spaced white strokes of the folded garment. The head appears enclosed between dense texture and flowing cloth.^[1]

The garment has been described as a wrap, cape or outer covering. Those are useful visual terms, not a documented fashion identification. No surviving textile, designer or garment label is linked to the drawing.

Brown chalk sketches portions of the clothing, while broad white lines follow folds and edges. The marks do not fully close the form. Cloth appears through direction and repetition rather than through a complete inventory of seams and fastenings.^[1]

The contrast between hair and wrap makes the face seem island-like, as the auction essay observes. Yet the surrounding forms also connect it to the sheet. Rather than floating free, the face is held in place by textures that expand outward and change pace.

What the Four Colours Do

Black supplies structural depth, especially where hair and shadow thicken. White lifts surfaces and creates linear shimmer. Brown extends clothing with a softer tonal weight than black. Red and blue act as concentrated signals rather than broad fields.^[1]

This distribution complicates the idea of a monochrome portrait drawing. The sheet is not richly coloured in the manner of a painting, but neither is colour incidental. Remove the blue pupils or red mouth and the hierarchy of attention changes immediately.

Klimt also plays the colours against different kinds of line. Some strokes hatch in parallel; others sweep around folds; still others sit as minute accents. Material variety and graphic variety cannot be separated.

The economy helps explain why the drawing could function independently. It does not look like a quick memorandum awaiting completion elsewhere. Face, hair, garment and edge relations have been brought to a deliberate balance within the sheet.

Autonomous Drawing, Not a Known Painting Study

Im Kinsky explicitly distinguishes the work from the spontaneous studies with which Klimt prepared a contemporary painted portrait such as Sonja Knips. The bust belongs to a group of autonomous female portrait drawings that Klimt developed as complete works on paper.^[1]

“Autonomous” does not mean that no experiment occurred. The coloured chalks test how little material is needed to sustain an intense likeness. It means that the sheet is not catalogued as a subordinate step towards an identified canvas.

This was an important change in status for drawing around the formation of the Vienna Secession. Klimt Database research notes that he moved among different graphic idioms according to purpose: atmospheric tonal portraits, severe linear illustrations and loose preparatory sketches. A drawing's function shaped its degree and kind of finish.^[3]

The bust should therefore be approached as an object with its own visual argument. Comparing it with paintings can clarify chronology, but no missing oil portrait is required to justify its existence.

The Secession-Era Portrait Drawing

The date 1897/98 places the sheet at the moment when Klimt helped found the Vienna Secession and was intensifying his engagement with Symbolism and international modern art. Im Kinsky describes this period as a flowering of his autonomous female portrait drawing.^[1]

Klimt Database scholarship identifies black chalk, occasional red chalk and soft pencil among the means used in adjacent atmospheric ladies' portraits. It relates their diffuse light and hatching to Georges Seurat, Eugène Carrière and Fernand Khnopff.^[3]

Those names offer comparisons of method, not a chain of direct copies. No single Seurat, Carrière or Khnopff work is documented as the template for Strobl 3318. Klimt's sheet belongs to a shared modern problem: how a face can emerge through broken tone, soft illumination and selective line.

Im Kinsky also compares the mask-like frontality of this type with Klimt's nearly contemporary Tragedy, Pallas Athene and Nuda Veritas. The relation concerns staring eyes, frontal construction and Symbolist intensity. Their mythological figures, inscriptions and materials do not migrate into the anonymous bust.^[1]

Anton Loew and Direct Acquisition

Dr Anton Loew acquired the drawing directly from Klimt. Loew was a physician, collector and supporter of modern Viennese art. His collection also included important paintings, but possession of this sheet does not establish that he commissioned it or that it portrays a member of his family.^[1][2]

The work later belonged to Anton's daughter Gertrud, known as Gertha Loew and subsequently Gertrud Baruch von Felsőványi. She is the named sitter in Klimt's separate 1902 oil portrait. There is no basis for transferring her identity onto the woman in this drawing.^[1][2]

Keeping the two objects apart is essential. One is an anonymous 1897/98 coloured-chalk bust; the other is a signed, narrow full-length oil of Gertrud from 1902. Shared ownership history is not evidence of shared model identity or a preparatory relationship.

The direct acquisition nevertheless shows that Klimt's autonomous drawings circulated among serious patrons. They were not merely studio residue discovered after his death.

Six Klimt Drawings in a Moser Bedroom

Gertrud married Johann Arthur Eisler von Terramare in February 1903. By 1904 the couple lived in an apartment at Haus Ölzelt on the Schottenring. Koloman Moser designed its furnishings, which the Wiener Werkstätte executed as one of the young collective's important early commissions.^[2]

Moser incorporated six Klimt drawings into the bedroom by giving them frames coordinated with the furniture. The bust was one of this group, five sheets of which survive. Drawing, frame, furniture and room became related without losing their separate authorship.^[1][2]

This installation changed the experience of the work. The frontal face was no longer encountered as an isolated sheet or portfolio item; it participated in a designed domestic environment. Repetition across several female portraits could form a rhythm around the room.

Klimt did not thereby co-design every piece of furniture, and Moser did not redraw the woman. The importance of the setting lies in coordination. Modern drawing was treated as substantial enough to shape the character of an interior.

Ucicky, the Foundation and the Heirs

Im Kinsky's provenance proceeds from Anton Loew to Gertrud Loew/Felsőványi, then to filmmaker Gustav Ucicky around 1941. Ursula Ucicky inherited it in 1961 and gave it to the Klimt Foundation in 2013.^[1]

The Nazi-era circumstances of the Loew family's losses require care. The auction record supplies a chain but not a fully reconstructed transaction for this exact drawing. It would be irresponsible to invent a seller, price, seizure order or voluntary-sale narrative.

The Foundation undertook provenance research into the Ucicky collection. Its public account says that five Klimt drawings for which provenance research had not reached a definitive verdict were assigned to the Felsőványi family as part of the 2014 just-and-fair solution. Im Kinsky records this sheet with the heirs under a restitution agreement.^[1][4]

The drawing and Gertrud's oil portrait were separate settlement objects. Their histories intersect through family ownership and the Ucicky/Foundation chain, but the bust is not a study for the painting and its 2019 sale is not the painting's 2015 or 2026 auction.

Exhibition, Restoration and 2019 Sale

The sheet appeared at the Gustav Klimt Center in Kammer am Attersee in 2012. It was later included in the Literature Museum's 2018–19 exhibition Berg. Wittgenstein. Zuckerkandl. Zentralfiguren der Wiener Moderne. These displays followed its 2016 restoration to the full unfolded dimensions.^[1]

Im Kinsky offered it in Vienna on 17 June 2019 with an estimate of €200,000 to €400,000. The hammer or highest-bid figure was €560,000. The published result was €712,000 including fees and Austrian VAT.^[1]

These amounts describe different stages of one sale. The estimate was a forecast range; €560,000 was the bid outcome before the full additions; €712,000 was the reported price including charges and tax. None is a timeless measure of the sheet's importance.

The public auction record does not name the successful buyer. No current museum holding or August 2026 exhibition has been confirmed in the retained sources. The responsible position is therefore limited: after the 2019 sale, present ownership, precise location and physical access are not publicly established.

Why the Drawing Matters

Bust of a Lady demonstrates how exact a generic title can become once object evidence is restored. Date, catalogue number, four chalk colours, white heightening, full sheet size, anonymous sitter and Loew provenance distinguish it from several later works with almost the same name.

Its visual power is equally specific. White hatching makes the face luminous and flat; blue fixes the pupils; red isolates the mouth; accumulated hair and broad cloth lines enclose the head. The result is neither an unfinished painting idea nor a conventional named commission.

The drawing's later life expands that independence. Anton Loew acquired it from Klimt. Moser made it part of a six-sheet bedroom ensemble. Conservation recovered its folded edges. Provenance research returned the heirs to its modern history, and the 2019 auction moved it into another, undisclosed phase.

An unidentified sitter need not be made fictional to hold attention. Klimt gave the sheet presence through material precision. The restraint required by its missing name is also what lets the drawing be seen on its own terms.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Accessed August 2026.

1. Im Kinsky, “Gustav Klimt, Lot 0426”: exact title, 1897/98 date, coloured-chalk medium, 45 × 32 centimetres, Strobl 3318, provenance, exhibitions, restoration, visual analysis and 2019 auction result. View source.
2. Gustav Klimt Database, “The Loew Family”: Gertrud Loew's marriage, Moser-designed apartment, six framed Klimt drawings, Wiener Werkstätte execution and family history. View source.
3. Gustav Klimt Database, “Cradle of Modernism”: autonomous late-1890s drawing, differing graphic functions, atmospheric ladies' portraits and Seurat–Carrière–Khnopff context. View source.
4. Klimt Foundation, “Provenance Research”: Ucicky-collection research, 2014 just-and-fair settlement and assignment of five drawings to the Felsőványi family. View source.
5. Christie's, “Brustbild einer Dame von vorne”: separate circa-1916/17 pencil sheet, simili Japan paper, 57 × 37.3 centimetres, Strobl 3707 and Georg Klimt provenance. View source.
6. Sotheby's, “Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale,” 3 February 2009: separate lot 3 under the title Brustbild einer Dame von vorne (Portrait of a Lady, Frontal View). View source.

More KLIMT Paintings

The Kiss

Adele Bloch-Bauer I

Death and Life

Hope II

Danae

Lady with a Fan

The Three Ages of Woman

Water Serpents I