Bill Duckett Nude at the Art Students’ League of Philadelphia by Thomas Eakins Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Page Created on / Page Updated on
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

Teaching and Anatomy: Introduction

Thomas Eakins approached art education as a practical investigation of how bodies occupy space. Anatomy disclosed structure beneath the skin; life drawing tested that knowledge against individual people; perspective located figures and objects within a measurable setting. Photography added another means of examining pose, movement, and the relation between a body and its surroundings. At the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, these interests became parts of an unusually integrated programme rather than isolated technical exercises.[1][2]

That programme was influential, but influence does not settle every question about its delivery. Eakins’s commitment to study from the nude brought valuable opportunities and serious disputes over consent, authority, and classroom boundaries. His departure from PAFA in 1886 belongs in the same history as his pedagogical innovations, without serving either as a melodramatic fall or as an inconvenience to be explained away. Teaching shaped his art, his relationships with students, and the institutions in which he worked; it must be judged with equal attention to method and responsibility.

At a Glance

  • Early preparationArt classes at PAFA alongside anatomy lectures and medical demonstrations at Jefferson Medical College [1][2]
  • Academy roleProfessor of drawing and painting from 1879 and director from 1882 until his departure in 1886 [1]
  • Core studiesAnatomy, dissection, work from living models, perspective, and mechanical drawing [1][2]
  • Classroom cameraA means of analysing pose and figure-ground relationships, not merely recording a finished arrangement [1][2]
  • Institutional breakPAFA asked Eakins to resign after disputes about his use of nude models and conduct during an anatomy class [1]
  • Later teachingWork with the Art Students’ League of Philadelphia and further lectures in Philadelphia and New York [1]

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Learning the Body
  3. A Curriculum of Looking
  4. Drawing Space Clearly
  5. The Camera in Class
  6. Authority and the 1886 Dispute
  7. After the Academy
  8. Knowledge in the Art
  9. A Demanding Legacy

Learning the Body

Eakins’s pedagogy began with his own education. Before leaving for Europe in 1866, he attended PAFA and followed anatomy instruction and clinical demonstrations at Jefferson Medical College. Paris then supplied sustained academic training in the figure, painting, and sculpture. When he returned to Philadelphia in 1870, he possessed several ways to understand form: observation of a living model, knowledge of bones and muscles, modelling in three dimensions, and the geometry of pictorial space.[2]

These were connected forms of evidence, not guarantees of truth. A dissected body can reveal attachments and structures that are difficult to see in life, but it cannot reproduce balance, breath, or a changing expression. A model provides those visible conditions, while perspective helps the artist test whether separate observations belong together coherently. PAFA’s account credits Eakins’s teaching era with greatly increasing attention to human anatomy, including cadaver dissection and study from the nude.[3] The claim is most useful when read as a change of emphasis within an institution, not as proof that one teacher alone invented American figure study.

The distinction matters because Eakins taught students to move between general structure and individual variation. An anatomical diagram identifies a typical arrangement; a person presents a particular build, posture, and distribution of weight. Art begins in the decisions required to reconcile those kinds of knowledge. That is why his curriculum belonged to drawing and painting rather than to medical training, even when some of its materials came from medicine.

His path from Jefferson’s demonstrations to an artist’s classroom is traced more fully in the biography. The connection should not be mistaken for a claim that he trained as a surgeon or turned painters into medical specialists. He borrowed investigative habits: look beneath an appearance, understand the mechanism of an action, and check a general rule against a specific case. In the studio, those habits served representation. A shoulder was studied so that its turn could be drawn convincingly, not so that a student could diagnose it.[1][2]

A Curriculum of Looking

At PAFA, Eakins pressed students beyond copying polished works or relying only on casts. Work from life made proportion a question to be answered in each pose. Dissection allowed a muscle’s visible action to be related to its position beneath the surface. Wax or plaster modelling could make a form available in the round. Such exercises asked students to verify what they thought they knew instead of repeating a conventional outline.[3]

The classroom was also a social setting governed by schedules, separate levels of experience, institutional rules, and unequal roles. Teachers selected problems and models; students were expected to look and make images; models’ bodies became the material of instruction. A photograph in the Philadelphia Museum of Art collection records Eakins with students at the Academy, giving the programme a collective setting rather than the appearance of a solitary master transmitting ideas to anonymous followers.[5] It cannot tell us that everyone in the room agreed with his methods. Institutional photographs show participation, not unanimity.

Students encountered this programme differently. Some valued its directness and later supported Eakins; others objected to particular practices or to the way he exercised authority. The historical record therefore resists a simple division between enlightened instruction and conservative opposition. Rigorous life study could enlarge an artist’s knowledge while a teacher’s decisions about exposure and participation could still violate expectations or boundaries. Both propositions can be true at once.

Nor was there one mandatory path from exercise to finished picture. A student might draw a model to understand contour, build a small form to test volume, or photograph a pose for later comparison. Each method made some information clearer and left other qualities unavailable. This plural structure helps explain why Eakins valued exact procedures without settling on one mechanical formula for art.[3]

Drawing Space Clearly

Eakins treated perspective as something an artist could reason through. The public description of his surviving drawing manual identifies lectures on linear perspective, mechanical drawing, reflections, and sculptural relief. He prepared a manuscript and illustrations for students, but abandoned publication after leaving PAFA; drafts now divided between the Academy and the Philadelphia Museum of Art were later brought together by editors.[4] The modern publication record establishes the project’s scope without requiring claims about pages that have not been consulted.

This range makes sense beside his pictures. A racing shell narrows sharply as it recedes, an oar crosses reflective water, and the curved ranks of an amphitheatre place many spectators above a central action. Perspective was not a decorative display of calculation. It let an artist test spatial relationships whose credibility supports the subject. The paintings guide follows those problems from the Schuylkill River to the surgical theatres.

Mechanical drawing also connected Eakins to a practical Philadelphia culture familiar with designed objects, instruments, and measured construction. Yet his pictures do not look like engineering diagrams. Geometry sets the conditions in which a figure can move or stand; light, colour, gesture, and selection create the human emphasis. Teaching perspective thus served observation without pretending that measurement alone could make a work of art.

The Camera in Class

By about 1880, photography had entered Eakins’s professional and domestic practice. The Metropolitan Museum of Art describes him using a wooden view camera, glass-plate negatives, and platinum printing, while expecting students to learn the medium’s technical demands. It characterises the camera as a teaching device comparable to anatomical drawing: a way to refine looking and explore complex relations between figure and ground.[6]

This did not make every photograph a preliminary sketch for a painting. The Met notes that only a small number of oils have direct photographic counterparts, with Swimming and Arcadia among the most prominent. Many camera studies instead examine a pose, a sequence, a group, or a person on their own terms. The photography and working-studies guide separates these functions and follows object-level attributions, since hundreds of surviving images are assigned to Eakins and his circle rather than automatically to him alone.[6]

PAFA’s survey of Eakins as photographer similarly places the medium within teaching, portraiture, family life, landscape, and sustained study of the nude. Its core collection came from Charles Bregler, a former student, and includes hundreds of prints and negatives. PAFA also stresses that photographs made at the Academy involved Eakins and members of his circle.[7] A shared studio, equipment, or model does not by itself establish who exposed a plate; responsible interpretation must preserve those distinctions.

The camera changed the duration of looking. A live pose ends, muscles tire, and gestures shift. A plate fixes one configuration that can be compared or revisited. But the image also reflects framing, timing, lighting, printing, and decisions about who was placed before the lens. Photography did not remove authority from the classroom encounter. It preserved the consequences of that encounter in an especially durable form.

Authority and the 1886 Dispute

In January 1886, Eakins removed the loincloth from a male model during an anatomy demonstration for a class that included women. Complaints reached PAFA’s board, and he was required to leave his directorial and teaching positions. Museum accounts variously use the language of dismissal, resignation, or forced resignation, but they agree on the institutional outcome and its connection to contested use of the nude.[1][3]

The episode should not be reduced to a quarrel over whether artists needed anatomical knowledge. It concerned the conditions under which a teacher made a body visible and the authority he assumed in doing so. A pedagogical purpose does not supply blanket permission. Students and models occupied positions with less institutional power than the director, and objections cannot be dismissed merely because the study of anatomy produced important art.

Nor does the conflict require treating life drawing itself as suspect. PAFA records that study from the model and other changes associated with Eakins’s era remained within its curriculum long after he left.[3] The durable educational practice and the disputed act are not identical. Separating them allows a more exact assessment: anatomical and observational training could be valuable, while a specific exercise of authority could still cross an important line.

Swimming makes the difficulty visible in another form. The Amon Carter Museum identifies the 1885 painting as a group portrait of Eakins and several male students and relates it to his ideal of a community devoted to life study. The same record notes both student support and unsettling accounts of aggressive pressure concerning nudity.[9] Formal balance on the canvas does not cancel those testimonies, just as controversy does not erase the painting’s carefully organised inquiry into bodies at rest, diving, and moving through water.

After the Academy

Eakins’s separation from PAFA broke a major institutional relationship, but it did not end his teaching. A group of students left the Academy and formed the Art Students’ League of Philadelphia, where he instructed during 1886–87; he also continued lecturing elsewhere in Philadelphia and New York.[1] Calling that group supportive is accurate. Treating it as representative of every student response would not be.

The Met’s Bill Duckett Nude, at the Art Students’ League of Philadelphia provides a precise object from this later setting. It is a platinum print of about 1889, object 43.87.20, and the museum identifies Duckett as a young companion of Walt Whitman. The title locates the study at the League, while the record states that Eakins made several photographs of him there.[8] No broader claim about Duckett’s views, motives, or relationship with the artist is needed to understand the image as a deliberate study of a seated figure.

The print is neither evidence that the League lacked boundaries nor proof that all post-PAFA teaching reproduced the earlier dispute. It establishes a continuing intersection of camera work, life study, and instruction. Its careful illumination and enclosed pose also show why a study could exceed a merely utilitarian function. The image preserves an individual person, not an interchangeable anatomical specimen.

Knowledge in the Art

Eakins’s anatomical education is most obvious in subjects where trained action matters, but it should not be used as a universal explanation. The Gross Clinic predates his PAFA directorship and draws on his own medical observation: surgeon Samuel D. Gross addresses students while doctors operate in Jefferson Medical College’s amphitheatre.[11] Knowledge of anatomy helped Eakins construct the action, yet the painting also depends on hierarchy, lighting, portraiture, and the controlled visibility of the patient.

The Agnew Clinic revisits medical instruction in 1889. Penn Nursing’s account identifies nurse Mary V. Clymer within the surgical team and places the operation in the history of changing medical and nursing practice.[12] Perspective arranges the amphitheatre, but arrangement also carries social meaning: surgeon, assistants, nurse, patient, and students occupy distinct positions. Technical command makes those relations legible; it does not make them neutral.

In portraits, anatomical knowledge operates more quietly. A sitter’s shoulders settle into clothing, hands bear weight or withdraw, and fatigue can register in the face. These effects are not demonstrations of named muscles. The portraits guide shows how sustained sittings, composition, and personal knowledge worked with bodily observation. Eakins’s strongest likenesses preserve character as an open question rather than presenting physiology as destiny.[10]

The same restraint is useful when considering influence. Students could absorb habits of close looking, modelling, or spatial construction without becoming replicas of their teacher. An institution could retain life study while rejecting his conduct. A photograph could serve instruction and still become an independent object. Eakins’s legacy lies partly in these separable possibilities, not in a single method transmitted unchanged.

A Demanding Legacy

Eakins made art education answerable to observed structure, lived posture, and intelligible space. His drawing project joined geometry to studio practice; his camera work expanded the evidence available to students; his anatomical programme refused vague formulas for the body. These were consequential contributions to Philadelphia teaching.[3][4][6]

They are best understood without converting innovation into exoneration. The 1886 dispute shows that seriousness of purpose does not remove obligations to students and models. The later League shows that support persisted, but not that opinion was unanimous. The artworks show anatomy becoming composition, not a licence for every pedagogical choice. Read this way, Eakins’s teaching remains valuable precisely because its achievements and its limits can both be examined.

Researched works directory

This searchable evidence census was assembled from public museum records and a reproducible Wikidata snapshot. It is not a catalogue raisonné, not a claim to complete oeuvre coverage, and not a substitute for the published catalogue literature, which was not used to claim absolute completeness.

275 artworks

NameDateMedium
A Singer (Mrs. W.H. Bowden)1906Painting
A Singer: Portrait of Mrs. W.H. Bowden1906Painting
A Street SceneDate unknownPainting
A street scene in Sevilla1870Painting
A Street Scene in Seville1870Painting
African-American Man1884Photography
An Actress (Portrait of Suzanne Santje)1903Painting
Anna Lewis1890Painting
Annie C. Lochrey Husson (Mrs. Louis Husson)1905Painting
Antiquated Music (Portrait of Sarah Sagehorn Frishmuth)1900Painting
Arcadia1883Painting
ArcadiaDate unknownSculpture
Arcadia: Figure Study, Female Nude1883Painting
Arcadia Sketch1883Painting
ArcadianDate unknownPainting
Archbishop Diomede Falconio1905Painting
Archbishop James Frederick Wood1877Painting
Archbishop James Frederick Wood (1813-1883)1876Painting
Archbishop William Henry Elder1903Painting
Arthur B. Frost1886Painting
Artist and His Father Hunting Reed Birds: Marsh Landscape Sketch1873Painting
B.J. Blommers1904Painting
Baby at Play1876Painting
Baseball Players Practicing1875Artwork
Benjamin Eakins G38Date unknownPainting
Bertrand Gardel (Sketch for The Chess Players)1875Painting
Between Rounds1898Painting
Billy Smith1898Painting
Billy Smith (Sketch for Between Rounds)1898Painting
Boy Reclining1883Painting
Carmelita Requena1869Painting
Charles Edmund Dana1902Painting
Charles Percival Buck1904Painting
Clara1890Painting
Courtship1878Painting
Cowboy Singing1892Painting
Cowboys in the Badlands1888Painting
Cowboys in the Badlands sketch 21888Painting
Delaware River Scene1881Painting
Delaware River Study1881Painting
Dr. Agnew (Dr. D. Hayes Agnew) (1818-1892)1889Painting
Dr. Agnew (Dr. D. Hayes Agnew) (1818–1892)1889Painting
Dr. Horatio C. Wood1886Painting
Dr. Thomas H. Fenton1916Painting
Drifting1875Painting
Eakins G1841916Painting
Ecorché: Relief of a Horse (Josephine)1882Sculpture
Edward W. Redfield1905Painting
Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand: Landscape Study of Fairmount Park1879Painting
Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand: Study of a Horse's Leg1879Painting
Fairmount Park (Sketch for The Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand)Date unknownPainting
Female Model1867Painting
Female Nude1884Painting
Female Nude from the Back1889Photography
Female Nude (Study)1881Painting
Fifty Years Ago (Young Girl Meditating): Study1877Painting
Figure Study: Masked Nude WomanDate unknownPainting
Figure Study: Nude Woman, Seated, with Arms Lowered (r)Date unknownPainting
Figure Study: Nude Woman, Seated, with Arms RaisedDate unknownPainting
[Four Sketches: Seated Man, Sleeping Dog, Two Vases(?)]Date unknownPainting
Frances Eakins1870Painting
Francis J. Ziegler1890Painting
Frank Hamilton Cushing1895Painting
Frank Jay St. John1900Painting
General E. Burd Grubb (1841-1914)1898Painting
Girl with a Fan; Portrait of Miss GutierrezDate unknownPainting
Harriet Husson Carville (Mrs. James G. Carville)1904Painting
Harrison S. Morris1896Painting
Hauling the Seine1882Painting
Head of a Man (Rutherford B. Hayes?)1877Painting
Hiawatha1874Painting
HiawathaDate unknownArtwork
Home Ranch1892Painting
Home Scene1871Painting
Homespun1881Painting
In the Studio1884Painting
Interior of a Woodcarver's Shop (Sketch for William Rush Carving His Allegorical Figure of the Schuylkill River)Date unknownPainting
James MacAlister (Sketch)1895Painting
John Biglin in a Single Scull1873Painting
John Biglin in a Single Scull1874Painting
Joseph R. Woodwell1904Painting
Kathrin1872Painting
Knitting1881Sculpture
Knitting1882Sculpture
KnittingDate unknownSculpture
Lafayette Park, Washington, D.C.1877Painting
Landscape1881Painting
Landscape1882Painting
Landscape Sketch1880Painting
Landscape (Sketch for Cowboys in the Bad Lands)1887Painting
Landscape Study: Cultivated Field and Tree1874Painting
Landscape Study: Shoreline with Trees1874Painting
Landscape with a Dog1874Painting
Letitia Wilson Jordan1888Painting
Louis Husson1899Painting
Major Manuel Waldteufel1907Painting
Masked nude standing1880Painting
Maud Cook (Mrs. Robert C. Reid)1895Painting
Mending the Net1881Painting
Mending the Net: Study of a FishermanDate unknownPainting
Miss Alice Kurtz1903Painting
Miss Amelia Van Buren1891Painting
Miss Eleanor S. F. Pue1907Painting
Miss Gertrude Murray1895Painting
Monsignor James P. Turner1906Painting
Mother (Annie Williams Gandy)1903Painting
Mrs. Gilbert L. Parker1910Painting
Mrs. Mary Arthur1900Painting
Music1904Painting
Nude man with beardDate unknownPainting
Nude Woman Standing1908Painting
Old Lady Sewing1879Painting
Portrait of a Little Girl1897Painting
Portrait of a Woman ReadingDate unknownPainting
Portrait of Adam S. Bare1903Painting
Portrait of Alfred ReynoldsDate unknownPainting
Portrait of Arthur Burdett Frost1886Painting
Portrait of Ashbury Wright Lee1905Painting
Portrait of Benjamin Eakins1894Painting
Portrait of Benjamin Eakins (Sketch for The Writing Master)1882Painting
Portrait of Blanche Hurlburt1885Painting
Portrait of Douglass Morgan Hall1889Painting
Portrait of Dr. Edward J. Nolan1900Painting
Portrait of Dr. Samuel D. Gross (The Gross Clinic)1875Painting
Portrait of Edward Taylor Snow1904Painting
Portrait of Elizabeth L. Burton1905Painting
Portrait of Florence Einstein1905Painting
Portrait of Henry O. Tanner1902Painting
Portrait of J. Harry Lewis1876Painting
Portrait of John B. Gest1905Painting
Portrait of Joshua Ballinger Lippincott1892Painting
Portrait of Leslie W. Miller1901Painting
Portrait of Lucy Lewis1896Painting
Portrait of Margaret Eakins in a Skating Costume1871Painting
Portrait of Mary Adeline Williams1899Painting
Portrait of Mary Adeline Williams1900Painting
Portrait of Mrs. Fairman Rogers (Study for The Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand)1879Painting
Portrait of Mrs. Frank Hamilton Cushing1895Painting
Portrait of Mrs. James Mapes Dodge (Josephine Kern)1896Painting
Portrait of Professor Benjamin H. Rand1874Painting
Portrait of Professor W. D. Marks1886Painting
Portrait of Rear Admiral George Wallace Melville1904Painting
Portrait of Walter S. Macdowell1904Painting
Porträt des Alfred Bryan Wall1904Painting
Porträt des David Wilson JordanDate unknownPainting
Porträt des John McLure Hamilton (1853- 1936)1895Painting
Professionals at Rehearsal1883Painting
Professor William D Marks1886Painting
Professor William Woolsey Johnson1896Painting
Pushing for Rail1874Painting
Rail Shooting on the Delaware1876Painting
Rear Admiral Charles Dwight Sigsbee G388-21903Painting
Rear Admiral George W. Melville1905Painting
Reclining Male Nude1887Photography
Reclining NudeDate unknownPainting
Retrospection1880Painting
Riter Fitzgerald1895Painting
Robert M. Lindsay1900Painting
Ruth (Ruth W. Harding)1903Painting
Saddle (Sketch for Cowboys in the Bad Lands)1887Painting
Sailboats Racing on the Delaware1874Painting
Sailboats Racing: Study of the Delaware River1874Painting
Sailing1875Painting
Salutat1898Painting
Seated Figures1886Painting
Self-portrait1902Painting
Seventy Years Ago1877Painting
Shad Fishing at Gloucester on the Delaware: Delaware River and Gloucester Pier1881Painting
Shad Fishing at Gloucester on the Delaware River1881Painting
Shad Fishing at Gloucester on the Delaware River: Study of a Woman's Head1881Painting
Ships and Sailboats on the Delaware1874Painting
Ships and Sailboats on the Delaware: Study1874Painting
Shoreline of the Delaware River, with Fishing NetsDate unknownPainting
Signora Gomez d'Arza1901Painting
Singing a Pathetic Song1881Painting
Sketch for Cowboys in the Bad Lands1887Painting
Sketch for Music (The Violinist)1904Painting
Sketch for Portrait of Dr. Jacob Mendez da Costa1893Painting
Sketch for Portrait of Leslie W. Miller1901Painting
Sketch for Portrait of Letitia Wilson Jordan1888Painting
Sketch for Portrait of Monsignor James P. Turner1906Painting
Sketch for Portrait of Mother Patricia Waldron1903Painting
Sketch for Portrait of Professor George F. Barker1886Painting
Sketch for Seventy Years AgoDate unknownPainting
Sketch for The Concert Singer1892Painting
Sketch for The Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand1879Painting
Sketch for The Gross Clinic1875Painting
Sketch for the Surrender of General Lee to General Grant at AppomatoxDate unknownPainting
Sketch for William Rush and His Model1908Painting
Sketch of a Landscape1882Painting
Sketch of a Man and Study of Drapery1882Painting
Sketch of Harry1892Painting
Sketch of Max Schmitt in a Single Scull1874Painting
Sketches for “Home-Spun”, (recto and verso)1881Painting
Sketches (Four on one panel)Date unknownPainting
Spinning1881Painting
Spinning1882Sculpture
Spinning: Sketch1881Painting
Starting Out After Rail1863Painting
Starting Out After Rail1874Painting
Study for Arcadia: Youth Playing Pipes1883Painting
Study for "Cowboys in the Badlands1887Painting
Study for "Negro Boy Dancing": The Banjo PlayerDate unknownPainting
Study for "Negro Boy Dancing": The BoyDate unknownPainting
Study for Portrait of John McClure Hamilton1895Painting
Study for Salutat1898Painting
Study for 'The Meadows, Gloucester'1882Painting
Study for "William Rush Carving His Allegorical Figure of the Schuylkill River1876Painting
Study of a Groom1879Painting
Study of a Nude Man1869Painting
Study of a Nude Man (The Strong Man)1869Painting
Study of a Seated Nude Woman Wearing a Mask1863Drawing
Study of a Young Woman1868Painting
Study of Dr Samuel David Gross1875Painting
Study of Horse for The Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand1879Painting
Swimming1885Painting
Taking the Count1898Painting
Taking the Count, study1898Painting
Taking Up Net1881Painting
Talcott Williams1889Painting
That's a New Game Down in Frisco": Study for the Central Standing Figure1878Painting
The Agnew Clinic1889Painting
The Art Student (James Wright)1890Painting
The Artist's Wife and His Setter Dog1884Painting
The Biglin Brothers Racing1872Painting
The Biglin Brothers Turning the Stake1873Painting
The Black Fan (Portrait of Mrs. Talcott Williams)1891Painting
The Bohemian (Portrait of Franklin Louis Schenck)1890Painting
The Brinton House1878Painting
The Cello Player1896Painting
The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull)1871Painting
The Chaperone1908Painting
The Chess Players1876Painting
The Concert Singer1890–1892Painting
The Courtship1878Painting
The Crucifixion1880Painting
The Dancing Lesson1878Painting
The Dean's Roll Call1899Painting
The Fairman Rogers Four-in-Hand1879Painting
The Fairman Rogers Four-In-Hand (A May Morning in...1899Painting
The Meadows, Gloucester1882Painting
The Model1908Painting
The Oarsmen (The Schreiber Brothers)1874Painting
The Oboe Player (Portrait of Dr. Benjamin Sharp)1903Painting
The Old-Fashioned Dress (Portrait of Helen Montanverde Parker)1908Painting
The Pair-Oared Shell1872Painting
The Pathetic Song1881Painting
The Pianist1896Painting
The Poleman in the Ma'sh1881Drawing
The Red Shawl1890Painting
The Spinner1876Painting
The Thinker: Portrait of Louis N. Kenton1900Painting
The Timer1879Painting
The Translator, Portrait of Monsignor Hugh T. Henry1902Painting
The Veteran (Portrait of George Reynolds)Date unknownPainting
The Writing Master1882Painting
The Young Man (Portrait of Kern Dodge)1898Painting
Thomas Eakins and John Laurie Wallace on a Beach1883Photography
Three Boys Wading in a Creek1883Photography
Trenton Battle Monument1893Sculpture
Two Pupils in Greek Dress1883Photography
Views of Harry1885Painting
Walt Whitman1887Painting
Whistling for Plover1874Painting
William H. Macdowell1884Photography
William H. Macdowell and Margaret Eakins in Saltville (or Clinch Mountain), Virginia1875Photography
William Hance Macdowell (1816-1906)1897Painting
William Rush and his Model1908Painting
William Rush and His ModelDate unknownPainting
William Rush Carving His Allegorical Figure of the Schuylkill River1876Painting
William Rush Carving His Allegorical Figure of the Schuylkill River1908Painting
William Rush Carving His Allegorical Figure of the Schuylkill River, Study1876Painting
William Rush's Model1908Painting
Wrestlers1899Painting
Young Girl Meditating1877Painting

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Thomas Eakins teach at PAFA?

He taught drawing and painting through a programme that emphasised the living figure, anatomy, dissection, perspective, mechanical drawing, and practical modelling. These elements were intended to work together: structural study informed observation, while perspective tested whether bodies and objects occupied coherent space.[3][4]

Why was anatomy important to Eakins?

Anatomy gave him a way to understand the structures that support weight and movement. He paired that general knowledge with direct observation because no diagram can supply the posture, proportions, or expression of a particular person. In his medical and athletic pictures, credible bodies support larger questions about action and authority.[2][11]

How did Eakins use photography in teaching?

The camera could preserve poses, support comparison, and sharpen attention to figure-ground relationships. Eakins also expected students to engage with its technical processes. It was one resource among life drawing, dissection, modelling, and perspective, and most surviving photographs were not simply templates copied into paintings.[6][7]

Why did Eakins leave PAFA in 1886?

He removed a male model’s loincloth during an anatomy class that included women, after broader tensions about his use of the nude. Complaints led PAFA’s board to require his departure. The educational importance of figure study does not resolve the separate issue of how he used institutional authority and observed classroom boundaries.[1][3]

Did Eakins stop teaching after PAFA?

No. A group of students established the Art Students’ League of Philadelphia, where he taught in 1886–87, and he continued lecturing at other institutions in Philadelphia and New York. This continuation demonstrates substantial support, but it should not be mistaken for agreement from every former student.[1][8]

Discussion

Use this evidence-led guide as a starting point for close looking rather than a final verdict.

Share an observation about Teaching and Anatomy or a source that adds useful context.

Reader Insights

Close Looking

Which work most clearly complicates the familiar image of Eakins as a strictly literal realist?

Context

Where do Philadelphia, Paris training, anatomy, photography or institutional life most productively alter your reading?

Open Question

Which source or surviving object would you investigate next?

Join the Conversation

Add your reading below, keeping observations specific and evidence clear.

References

  1. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Thomas Eakins: American Realist, accessed 30 August 2026.
  2. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Thomas Eakins: Exhibition Overview, accessed 30 August 2026.
  3. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, Fernando Orellana: His Study of Life, accessed 30 August 2026.
  4. Philadelphia Museum of Art, A Drawing Manual by Thomas Eakins, accessed 30 August 2026.
  5. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Thomas Eakins and Students at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, accessed 30 August 2026.
  6. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Thomas Eakins (1844–1916): Photography, 1880s–90s, accessed 30 August 2026.
  7. Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, PAFA Presents Thomas Eakins: Photographer, accessed 30 August 2026.
  8. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Bill Duckett Nude, at the Art Students’ League of Philadelphia, accessed 30 August 2026.
  9. Amon Carter Museum of American Art, Swimming, accessed 30 August 2026.
  10. Smithsonian American Art Museum, Thomas Eakins, accessed 30 August 2026.
  11. Philadelphia Museum of Art, Portrait of Dr. Samuel D. Gross (The Gross Clinic), accessed 30 August 2026.
  12. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Eakins and Clymer, accessed 30 August 2026.

More EAKINS Artworks

The Agnew Clinic image: gallery photograph by Miguel Hermoso Cuesta, cropped and perspective-corrected, under CC BY-SA 4.0.