by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Published on September 28, 2026
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

About the painting

Piet Mondrian's Composition II of 1929 belongs to the National Museum of Serbia in Belgrade. It is a painting of sharply unequal coloured and white areas held together by broad black divisions. Its name can easily be confused with other Mondrian works called Composition II, or with the red, blue and yellow painting in Zürich that appears so often in search results. This Belgrade canvas has its own firm identity: 1929, RKD catalogue number B212, National Museum inventory Istr. 43.[1][2]

The painting also has a history beyond its image. The National Museum records it in Belgrade from 1931, notes its place in the permanent display from the 1950s and devoted a 2014–15 exhibition to how people have interpreted and responded to it. Looking at the exact arrangement, and then at this documented history, gives the work more individuality than its spare title suggests.[3][4]

At a glance

  • ArtistPiet Mondrian (1872–1944)
  • TitleComposition II
  • Date1929
  • CollectionNational Museum of Serbia, Belgrade
  • Museum inventoryIstr. 43
  • Catalogue raisonnéJoosten B212
  • Belgrade historyIn the museum's care from 1931; included in its permanent display from the 1950s, according to the museum[1][3][4]

Where this painting sits in Mondrian's career

Works
1908191719291943

Contents

  1. What does the painting show?
  2. Why is the title so easy to confuse?
  3. When did it come to Belgrade?
  4. How has the museum presented it?
  5. Where does it fit in Mondrian's art?

What does the painting show?

Composition II contains no landscape, person or pictured object. Mondrian arranged horizontal and vertical black divisions around fields of red, blue, yellow and white. The red field begins well inside the upper part of the square rather than occupying the whole width; blue is confined to a smaller area low on the left; and a little yellow sits close to the lower right. In a small reproduction, the black area immediately above the yellow is especially easy to overlook. The National Museum's image and the matching, public-domain-marked Commons reproduction make those relationships visible.[2][5]

Piet Mondrian, Broadway Boogie Woogie
Compare Mondrian’s Broadway Boogie Woogie. Image: Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

The black bars are not a background grid of equal squares. Their positions create coloured and white areas of different sizes. Some intervals feel broad and open, while others become narrow accents. The red attracts the eye first, but the small yellow and blue areas prevent a reading that stops there. A useful way to look is to follow one black line to the picture's edge, return to the red, then notice how much space separates it from the blue. The balance depends on these particular distances, rather than on a mirror image across the centre.

White matters as much as the three primary colours. It keeps the bars apart and gives the coloured planes different amounts of room. Nor do red, blue and yellow act as a code with a fixed meaning attached to each one. A claim that the blue stands for a specific feeling or that the red depicts a real object would require evidence the museum's object identification does not provide. Here the sounder interpretation starts with the differences among sizes, directions and colours that a viewer can see.

It is worth returning to the lower right after a first look. The yellow area is small, but the neighbouring dark block and the surrounding white make it distinct. If that accent were enlarged or removed, the overall balance would change. Mondrian's economy of means makes such a tiny decision consequential. The same can be said of the width and placement of the black divisions. Their exact relations are part of this painting's identity, even though many works of the period use a similar vocabulary.

Why is the title so easy to confuse?

Mondrian repeatedly used descriptive titles such as Composition and numbered versions of them. The RKD catalogue places several similarly named paintings alongside the Belgrade work in its 1929–30 sequence. It lists a 1929 Composition no. II in the Museum of Modern Art in New York as B209, the Belgrade Composition II as B212, and a 1930 Composition with red, blue and yellow in Kunsthaus Zürich as B217. These entries point to three different objects, not three names for one canvas.[1]

The distinction matters because an image search or a short caption may omit the collection and catalogue number. The Zürich painting is the 1930 work made at the request of architect Alfred Roth, later donated to Kunsthaus Zürich. That patron, date and donation history belong to B217. They should not be carried over to the Belgrade painting simply because both employ red, blue, yellow, white and black.[1][6]

Likewise, the older page titled Composition II on this site pictures a different Mondrian composition. A shared title is not enough to identify the Belgrade work. For this page, the strongest short identification is National Museum of Serbia, Istr. 43, B212, 1929. It connects the painting to the museum's own record and to the catalogue sequence, even when a reproduction is small.[1][2]

Watch: Piet Mondrian

See his studio, the move toward geometric abstraction and the rhythms of his New York paintings.

When did it come to Belgrade?

The National Museum's 2014 annual report says the painting has been in its care since 1931. The report adds that the institution at the time was the Museum of Contemporary Art in Belgrade. The museum's publication notice describes the work more broadly as part of its foreign-painting collection since the 1930s. These statements are compatible: one supplies a year, the other a decade.[3][4]

The available museum documents do not give a full acquisition narrative on the cited pages. They do not by themselves establish the exact chain of ownership before 1931 or a purchase price. What they do establish is that the painting entered a Belgrade museum very early in its life and remained significant enough to become a sustained point of reference there. The museum says it appeared in the permanent display from the 1950s. That is a history different from the Zürich canvas, which Alfred Roth donated to Kunsthaus Zürich in 1987.[3][6]

The gap between painting date and museum arrival is short: Mondrian dated the work 1929, and the museum reports possession from 1931. Yet those two facts alone do not tell us how viewers initially understood the composition or where it hung in each intervening year. The later exhibition devoted to its reception is valuable precisely because the story of a painting includes what subsequent institutions and artists made of it, as well as the circumstances of its creation.

How has the museum presented it?

From 27 November 2014 to 22 February 2015, the National Museum mounted Piet Mondrian: The Case of Composition II. Its annual report says the exhibition concentrated on the painting's reception. It brought together artistic and curatorial projects that had treated Composition II as a point of reference, along with archival and documentary material about the work's life in the museum. The report describes approximately thirty artistic exhibits, photographic presentations, television material and scanned documents available on screens.[4]

The exhibition's authors were Jelena Dergenc and Simona Ognjanović, who also wrote study texts for its catalogue. The museum's separate publication notice describes the catalogue as bilingual, in Serbian and English. The notice is evidence that such a catalogue exists; it does not mean that every argument in the book has been consulted here. The public museum records are sufficient to establish the exhibition's subject and the painting's importance to the institution, without assigning unverified interpretations to its curators.[3][4]

An exhibition about reception asks a different question from a standard account of Mondrian's style. It asks what later viewers, artists and museums did with the picture. The work's clear divisions and few colours make it easy to recognise and quote, but repetition can also flatten the specificity of the original. The Belgrade exhibition's archival dimension offered a way to recover that specificity: a single canvas had a location, inventory identity and history of display, even as its visual language travelled widely.[4]

Where does it fit in Mondrian's art?

The 1929 date places this painting within Mondrian's mature abstract work. By then he had moved well beyond the landscapes, trees and Cubist paintings of earlier decades, using straight divisions and a limited palette to explore relations of unequal parts. The Belgrade composition is neither an early step toward abstraction nor a late New York painting. Its relative stillness makes a useful comparison with the more broken and rhythmic lines of Broadway Boogie Woogie from the 1940s.[1][7]

That comparison does not make the 1929 work a rigid formula. The image has uneven intervals, small accents and a particular distribution of colour. Mondrian made numerous compositions in this period, and the RKD sequence makes their variety visible. The Belgrade painting deserves attention as one of those individual solutions, with a documented life in Serbia that sets it apart from the similarly titled canvases in New York and Zürich.[1]

Mondrian artworks directory

98 artworks

NameDateMedium
Red Amaryllis with Blue Background1907–1930Artwork
Apple Tree in Blue1908-1909Painting
Apple Tree, Pointillist Version1908-1909Painting
Apple Tree in Blue with Wavy Lines I1908Painting
Avond (Evening): The Red Tree1908-1910Painting
Beach with Five Piers at Domburg1909Painting
Beach with One Pier at Domburg1909Painting
Beach with Three or Four Piers at Domburg1909Painting
Broadway Boogie Woogie1942-1943Painting
Broekzijder Mill in the Evening1906Painting
Portrait of Carolus Marinus Johannes Willem van RijnendisputedPainting
Chrysanthemum (Cleveland, C46)1906–1942?Artwork
Chrysanthemum (C47)c. 1906–1907?Artwork
Church Tower at Domburg1911Painting
Composition 10 in Black and White1915Painting
Composition 81914Painting
Composition A1919–20Painting
Composition B (No.II) with Red1935Painting
Composition C (No.III) with Red, Yellow and Blue1935Painting
Tableau II (1921, B129)1921Painting
Composition in Colour A1917Painting
Composition in Oval with Color Planes I1914Painting
Composition in White and BluePainting
Composition in White, Black and RedPainting
Composition No 1, Gray, Red1935Painting
Composition No.10Painting
Composition No IIPainting
Composition No. III, with Red, Blue, Yellow, and BlackPainting
Composition No.IV / Composition 6Painting
Composition Trees 21912-1913Painting
Composition with Red, Blue and Yellow1930Painting
Duinlandschap (Dune Landscape)1911Painting
Dune IVPainting
Dune Sketch in Bright Stripes1909Painting
Farm Near DuivendrechtPainting
Five Tree Silhouettes along the Gein with Moon1907-1908Painting
Flowering (Blossoming) Apple Tree1912Artwork
Flowering Trees1912Artwork
Gladioli in a BottleArtwork
GladiolusArtwork
Gray Tree1911Painting
Haystack with Willow Trees1897Painting
H.H. van Aalst-Haagedoorn1910Painting
Lighthouse at Westkapelle in Brown, 19091909Painting
Lighthouse at Westkapelle in Orange, Pink, Purple and Blue, circa 19101910Painting
Lighthouse at Westkapelle in Pink, 19091909Painting
Lighthouse at Westkapelle with Clouds, 1908-19091908-1909Painting
Portrait of Louise Charlotte Mathilde van den BoschdisputedPainting
Lozenge Composition with Yellow, Black, Blue, Red, and Gray1921Painting
Portrait of Ludwig Wilhelm Schöffer1905Painting
New York City (1942, B301)1942Painting
Ocean 51915Painting
Oostzijdse Mill along the River Gein by Moonlight1903Painting
Oostzijdse Mill in Moonlight1907Painting
Oostzijdse Mill with Extended Blue, Yellow and Purple Sky1907Painting
Oostzijdse Mill with Panoramic Sunset and Brightly Reflected Colours1907-1908Painting
Oranges and Decorated Plate1900Artwork
Pointillist Dune Study, Crest at Centre1909Painting
Pointillist Dune Study, Crest at Left1909Painting
Pointillist Dune Study, Crest at Right1909Painting
Portrait of Egbert KuipersPainting
Red, Blue, Yellow CompositionPainting
Red, Yellow and BluePainting
RhytmusPainting
Sans TitrePainting
Sea toward Sunset1909Painting
Seascape1909Painting
Self Portrait (1900)1900Painting
Self Portrait (1918)1918Painting
SerigraphPrint
S.J.C. van Aalst1910Painting
Stammer Mill with Streaked Sky1905-1907Painting
Still Life with Apples, a Pot with Flowers and a Metal PanArtwork
Still Life with Gingerpot 21912Artwork
Still Life with Gingerpot I1911Artwork
Sun, Church in Zeeland, Zoutelande Church Facade1909Painting
Tableau 2Painting
Tableau IPainting
Tableau No 2 Composition No V1914Painting
Tableau No. 2/Composition No. VIIPainting
Tableau No IV Lozenge Composition with Red, Gray, Blue, Yellow, and BlackPainting
Tableau (Yellow, Black, Blue, Red and Grey)Painting
The Red MillPainting
Three Haystacks in a Field1907Painting
Trafalgar SquarePainting
The Tree A1913Painting
Truncated View of the Broekzijder MillPainting
Two Arum LiliesArtwork
Two Chrysanthemum Blossoms1899-1900Artwork
Victory Boogie Woogie1942-1944Painting
View from the Dunes with Beach and Piers, Domburg1909Painting
View of WinterswijkPainting
White Phloxes1899-1900Artwork
Willow Grove: Impression of Light and Shadow1905Painting
Windmill in SunlightPainting
Woods near Oele1907Painting
Yellow Chrysanthemums in a Ginger Pot1898Artwork
Composition II (1929, Belgrade)1929Painting

Frequently asked questions

Is this the famous red, blue and yellow Mondrian painting in Zürich?

No. The Belgrade Composition II is B212, dated 1929, in the National Museum of Serbia. The Zürich Composition with Red, Blue and Yellow is B217, dated 1930, in Kunsthaus Zürich. RKD gives separate entries and institutions for them.[1]

Where is the original Composition II ?

The painting discussed here belongs to the National Museum of Serbia in Belgrade, inventory Istr. 43. Its current display location should be checked with the museum before a visit.[1][2]

When did the museum acquire it?

The museum's annual report says it has held the painting since 1931. Its publication notice gives the broader phrase “since the 1930s.” The cited public records do not set out the complete earlier ownership chain.[3][4]

Why did the museum make an exhibition about one painting?

Its 2014–15 exhibition explored how artists, curators and the institution itself had responded to Composition II. It combined later artistic projects with archives and other material about the work's life in Belgrade.[4]

Discussion

Which small area changes the balance of this Belgrade painting most for you?

Reader Insights

Close Looking

Follow the black bars from the upper left to the blue and yellow corners. Where does your eye stop?

Balance

Which smaller field seems to answer the red most strongly, and does that change after a second look?

Compare the Works

How does this Belgrade painting differ from the separately catalogued 1930 Zürich painting?

Join the Conversation

Share what you notice in this painting below.

References

  1. RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History, Piet Mondrian: 1929–1930 (B206–B225), entries B209, B212 and B217. View source.
  2. National Museum of Serbia, “Piet Mondrian, Composition II, 1929,” object page. View source.
  3. National Museum of Serbia, “Piet Mondrian: The Case of Composition II,” bilingual catalogue notice. View source.
  4. National Museum of Serbia, 2014 annual report, p. 46. View source.
  5. Wikimedia Commons, “Piet Mondrian Belgrade.jpg,” reproduction and public-domain marking. View source.
  6. Kunsthaus Zürich, collection record for Composition with Red, Blue and Yellow, inventory 1987/0028. View source.
  7. The Museum of Modern Art, “Major Mondrian Retrospective Opens at the Museum of Modern Art,” 1995, pp. 2–4. View source.
  8. Lead image credit. Piet Mondrian, Composition II, 1929. National Museum of Serbia, Belgrade; inventory Istr. 43.