by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience

Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

Beyond the Silhouette: Reading Domes through Section, Support, Material and Use

A dome is a roof or vault of double curvature that covers a space. Many domes are made by rotating a curve around a vertical axis, but the category is broader than a hemisphere on a circle. Domes can be shallow, pointed, bulbous, ribbed, lobed, faceted, oval or polygonal. They can be formed from concrete, brick, stone, earth, timber, metal, reinforced concrete or a triangulated lattice. [1] [3] [15] [16]

The Pantheon's columned portico stands before the tall brick rotunda and the dark curve of its exterior dome under a deep blue sky.
The Pantheon in Rome at dusk, photographed by Nicholas Hartmann in May 2026, with the cylindrical rotunda and shallow exterior dome rising behind the portico. Nhartmannphotos, Pantheon portico and dome, Rome; CC BY-SA 4.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

That breadth is why a list of silhouettes is not enough. A rounded exterior may conceal a second inner shell. A drum can hide the transition from a square room. Decorative ribs can sit on a continuous surface, while a geodesic dome is a network of members and joints. To identify a dome reliably, read its plan, section, material, support and construction phase together. [2] [14] [17]

Domes also have many histories. Roman concrete, Byzantine pendentive construction, Persian brick shells, Ottoman mosque complexes, Mughal mausolea, Renaissance double shells and modern lattice structures are not stages in one inevitable sequence. Each belongs to particular materials, workshops, patrons, communities and uses. [23] [26] [29] [32] [38] [45]

Contents

  1. What Makes a Dome
  2. Plan and Section
  3. Support Transitions
  4. Masonry Behaviour
  5. Materials and Construction
  6. The Pantheon
  7. Hagia Sophia
  8. Persian Brick Domes
  9. Ottoman Prayer Halls
  10. Shrines and Muqarnas
  11. South Asian Adaptations
  12. Florence Cathedral
  13. Modern Framed Domes
  14. Light, Sound and Use
  15. Recommended Books
  16. Watch Dome Systems
  17. Fabric and Condition
  18. Evidence Table
  19. Field Checklist
  20. Frequently Asked Questions
  21. Discussion
  22. References

What makes a roof a dome

Double curvature is the starting point. If two principal curves across a surface are both convex upward, architectural vocabularies commonly call the result a dome. A sphere supplies the familiar example, but a dome can use other curvature or a non-circular plan. [1] [15] [16]

A hemispherical dome approximates half a sphere. A segmental or saucer dome has less rise. A pointed dome rises through curves that meet more sharply at the crown. A bulbous or onion-like profile swells outward before narrowing. These names describe visible profile; they do not reveal the material, number of shells or support system.

Other labels describe organisation. A ribbed dome has pronounced members dividing its surface. A coffered dome has recessed panels. An umbrella, lobed or gadrooned dome is divided into curved segments. A double-shell dome has distinct inner and outer surfaces, often connected by ribs or walls. A geodesic dome uses a triangulated lattice rather than a continuous masonry shell. [17] [35] [45] [46]

One building can belong to several categories at once. Florence Cathedral is octagonal in plan, pointed in profile, ribbed in organisation, brick-and-stone in material and double-shelled in section. [35] The useful question is not `Which single type is it?` but `Which axis does each label describe?`

Read plan and section before silhouette

Four invented diagram groups pair a dome plan and section, compare five profile relations, distinguish direct circular, pendentive-like, squinch-like and lattice support, and separate coherent masonry, an inserted ring, detached finish and crack-water evidence.
Original identification diagrams, not a measured building and not to scale. They separate plan, inner and outer profiles, drum and transition; compare profile without assigning material; distinguish continuous masonry from framed lattice systems; and keep condition evidence separate from diagnosis. No named monument, copied plan or section, survey, sacred image, inscription, heraldry, proprietary strengthening detail, force magnitude or engineering result is reproduced.

Text alternative for the diagram

Panel one pairs an invented circular plan inside a square support bay with a section through inner and outer shells. It labels intrados, extrados, crown or oculus, base ring, drum, transition, pier or wall and foundation. Panel two compares invented hemispherical, segmental, pointed, bulbous and double-shell profiles and warns that outline does not determine material or load path. Panel three compares a dome directly on a circular wall, a curved pendentive-like transition, a stepped squinch-like transition and a triangulated rib or lattice system. Panel four separates coherent jointed masonry, an inserted ring or tie, detached finish and crack plus water evidence. Prompts require material, joints, movement, moisture, repair, source and certainty. Every diagram is invented, unmeasured and not to scale.

A plan records the space beneath the dome and the line at which the shell is supported. Mark whether that support is circular, polygonal, square, rectangular, oval or irregular. Then locate piers, walls, arches and openings. A dome above a round rotunda has a different transition problem from one raised above four arches enclosing a square bay. [2] [3]

In section, trace the intrados, the inner surface seen from below, and the extrados, the upper surface beneath the covering. Their separation gives the visible shell depth, although hidden voids and fills may complicate it. Mark the crown, any oculus, the shell base, the drum, transition zone, supporting arches, piers or walls and the foundations. [3] [16]

An oculus is an opening near the crown. A lantern is a small structure that may rise above the crown or oculus and admit light. A drum is a vertical or polygonal wall that raises and supports the dome. Windows in a drum can illuminate the interior, but they also divide the supporting fabric into piers or wall strips. [1] [16]

The inner and outer profiles deserve separate lines. An exterior roof can be steeper for weathering or visibility while the interior remains lower. A cavity may contain stairs, ribs, ties or later reinforcement. Photography from the pavement can record outline, but it cannot establish that concealed section. [2] [20]

Direct support, drums, pendentives and squinches

A dome can sit directly on a circular wall, as at a rotunda, or rise on a circular or polygonal drum. When the room below is square or rectangular, builders need a transition between the corners and the dome base. Two important families are pendentives and squinches. [24] [25]

A pendentive is a curved triangular surface between supporting arches. Four pendentives can continue the geometry upward from a square of arches to a circular base. A squinch bridges a corner with an arch, niche, corbelled courses or related construction, progressively creating a polygon on which a dome can stand. [3] [22] [40]

Those concise definitions are only a map. Both families have regional variants, combined forms and long histories. Muqarnas can articulate a transition or form complex vault surfaces, but it is not simply another name for every squinch. [34] The dedicated Pendentives and Squinches page owns the full comparison; here the point is to locate the transition before interpreting the shell above.

How a masonry dome carries load

A masonry dome works in three dimensions. Under gravity, forces can travel along meridional paths running from crown to base and around circumferential paths at each level. Their magnitude and whether circumferential action is compressive or tensile depend on geometry, thickness, openings, self-weight, support restraint and cracks. [15] [17] [21]

The lower parts of some idealised domes tend to spread. Thick walls, piers, buttresses, surrounding vaults, rings, chains or ties can restrain that movement. A half-dome can participate in a larger composition. Ribs may stiffen, divide or help construct the shell, yet some are chiefly decorative. None of these roles should be assigned from a distant photograph. [14] [18] [19]

Cracking changes the problem. Meridional cracks can reduce circumferential continuity and divide a shell into arch-like strips; settlement or earthquake damage can alter contact and support conditions. That does not mean every visible crack proves imminent failure. Mapping, measured geometry, material investigation and monitoring are needed before structural assessment. [18] [19] [20]

Thrust-network and limit-analysis methods can test possible equilibrium states, but their force paths are analytical constructions. They depend on geometry, loads, material assumptions and boundaries supplied by the investigator. [14] [21] The diagram on this page therefore labels components and observations without giving force magnitudes or a safety verdict.

Materials and ways of building

Concrete can form a comparatively continuous shell in formwork. Brick and stone domes are assemblies of units and mortar whose coursing, bonding and joints matter. Timber domes use frames and connections beneath boards, plaster or coverings. Iron and steel enabled skeletal domes with glazed or sheet enclosures; reinforced concrete enabled thin shells with materially different tensile and compressive behaviour. [13] [17] [47]

Construction sequence matters as much as final form. Masonry may require centring, partial support, carefully bonded rings or staged closure. Brick courses can be radial, horizontal or arranged in patterns that help control work during erection. The small herringbone-brick dome preserved by Florence's cathedral works is instructive, but its date and original purpose are uncertain; it cannot prove one universal Renaissance procedure. [37]

Double shells introduce another layer. Inner and outer surfaces may be connected by ribs, rings or walls, with passages between. A lantern adds weight and openings near the crown. Later chains, steelwork, grout or concrete can alter how old fabric responds, so every visible intervention needs a date and material description. [2] [7] [35]

Construction history includes more than a famous designer. Masons, bricklayers, stonecutters, carpenters, plasterers, metalworkers, painters, labourers, surveyors, patrons and institutions all shape a dome. UNESCO's Taj Mahal record explicitly names dome builders within a much wider workforce. [38] A responsible account keeps those collective processes visible.

The Pantheon: concrete, rotunda and oculus

The Pantheon in Rome is an exceptional case of Roman concrete construction. Its dome covers a cylindrical rotunda whose thick brick-faced concrete wall contains relieving arches, recesses and passages. Concrete aggregate becomes lighter toward the crown, while coffers articulate the inner surface and an open oculus supplies direct light. [23]

The dome and rotunda create a geometrically concentrated interior. Moving sunlight from the oculus changes the room through the day, while the building's use shifted from an imperial Roman monument to the church of Santa Maria ad Martyres. [23] These histories matter alongside structure: the form was not produced only to demonstrate mechanics.

Concentric rows of deep square coffers curve around the bright circular oculus at the centre of the Pantheon dome.
The Pantheon's coffered interior dome and open oculus, photographed by T. Le Berre in February 2019. T. Le Berre, Interior oculus of the Rome Pantheon; CC BY-SA 4.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

The Pantheon should not be made the inventor of all domes. Earthen, brick, stone and timber traditions existed in different regions, and later builders did not merely copy its concrete technique. Its value here is narrower: it shows how a hemispherical inner profile, oculus, coffering, graded material and massive circular support can work as one documented building.

Hagia Sophia: a dome over arches and pendentives

Hagia Sophia in Istanbul presents a different relation. Its central dome rises above four arches and pendentives, while great piers and half-domes participate in the spatial and structural composition. The arrangement concentrates support at important points and opens much of the surrounding wall to light. [24] [25]

A broad central dome rises over pink and pale masonry, smaller half-domes, buttresses and four slender minarets beneath a blue sky.
Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, photographed by Arild Vågen in March 2013, with the central dome, subsidiary half-domes, buttressing and minarets visible in the layered exterior. Arild Vågen, Hagia Sophia, March 2013; CC BY-SA 3.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

The current form is the result of history, not one untouched act. The sixth-century dome suffered partial collapse after earthquakes and was rebuilt with a changed profile. Later repairs, buttressing, mosaics, plaster and changing use continued to alter the monument. [24] [25] [27]

Descriptions that say the dome floats or hangs from heaven belong to visual and sacred experience; they are not literal structural explanations. The gold surfaces, windows and concealed bulk make the shell appear lighter than its supporting system. [24] Recording and conservation have required scaffolding, material analysis, photogrammetry and close inspection of mosaic detachment. [27]

A circular gold-toned dome with radiating bands and Arabic calligraphy is encircled by bright windows above decorated curved corner surfaces.
The central dome of Hagia Sophia, photographed by Christophe Meneboeuf in June 2010, with its ring of windows and decorated supporting zones visible from below. Christophe Meneboeuf, Dome and pendentives of Hagia Sophia; CC BY-SA 3.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

Hagia Sophia has served Christian, Islamic, museum and again mosque contexts. UNESCO treats it within a historic urban landscape that also includes Ottoman mosques and living neighbourhoods. [26] Comparative Byzantine conservation research shows why surveyed material, connections and seismic context must remain specific to each church. [22] [42] Any account of the dome should respect changing custody instead of freezing the building at one date.

Persian brick domes and the Great Mosque of Isfahan

The Great Mosque of Isfahan grew through many campaigns. Its brick hypostyle halls contain numerous small domes, while two major Seljuq dome chambers frame a history of patrons, prayer, movement and later decoration. Different soffit patterns, ribs and oculi make the roof a record of experimentation rather than one repeated type. [28] [29]

A square opening frames a star-like rib pattern and concentric brick courses within darker surrounding brick vaults.
Intersecting ribs and patterned brick infill in a dome at the Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, photographed by Amir Pashaei in 2019; the Commons source identifies the image as HDR. Amir Pashaei, Ribbed vault of Jameh Mosque of Isfahan; CC BY-SA 4.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

Persian mosque architecture used square or polygonal dome chambers, iwans, squinch zones, brick patterning and, in later periods, double shells and extensive tile. These combinations developed through local craft and pre-Islamic as well as Islamic histories; they should not be described as a decorative branch of Byzantine architecture. [29] [41]

Tile, stucco and brick can belong to different phases. The Metropolitan Museum's history of Persian tiles traces changing techniques and surviving architectural contexts, while the Safavid overview places coloured mosque domes within patronage and artistic networks. [51] [52] Surface brilliance is historical fabric, not evidence that the tile itself forms the load-bearing shell.

Ottoman domed prayer halls

Ottoman architects developed domed mosque compositions within an imperial workshop, endowment and urban system. At Süleymaniye, the central dome, pendentives and half-domes organise a large prayer hall within a broader social and religious complex. [31] [32]

A lead-covered central dome and smaller roof volumes rise between four tall minarets against a bright blue, cloud-filled sky.
Selimiye Mosque in Edirne, photographed by Ahmet Baris ISITAN in September 2011, with its central dome and four minarets seen from the courtyard. Ahmet Baris ISITAN, Edirne: Selimiye’s dome and four minarets; CC BY-SA 3.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

Comparison with Hagia Sophia is relevant, but a sentence about influence is not a full explanation. Sinan and his collaborators reworked scale, support, light, subsidiary spaces and mosque use for Ottoman patrons and communities. The Historic Areas of Istanbul record places Byzantine and Ottoman monuments together as evidence of exchange across Europe and Asia, not as a ranking. [26]

Rüstem Pasha Mosque offers another scale and setting, where a domed interior, Iznik tile and dense commercial surroundings meet. [50] The mosque's visual identity depends on patronage, prayer and surface craft as well as the roof profile.

Shrines, qibla bays and muqarnas

Domes occupy different places in Islamic buildings. A dome can emphasise the bay before a mihrab, mark a mausoleum, cover a shrine or organise a central prayer hall. The Metropolitan Museum's survey stresses regional variety rather than one required mosque plan. [30]

The Dome of the Rock is a shrine and pilgrimage site, not a congregational mosque. Its dome, inscriptions, mosaics, tile and octagonal setting were interpreted and restored by successive rulers and communities. [33] Calling every famous Islamic dome a `mosque dome` would erase those functions.

Muqarnas consists of tiered, niche-like cells that can mediate between surfaces or create domed and semi-domed effects. [34] Its geometry, material and structural role vary. Some muqarnas is load-bearing masonry; some is applied or suspended decoration. A photograph needs joint and substrate evidence before deciding which.

South Asian adaptations and Mughal mausolea

Early Sultanate buildings in northern India show builders negotiating arches, domes, squinches, reused material and established local stone craft. [40] The result is not a clean replacement of one tradition by another. Imported ideas, local expertise, patronage and available material met in specific projects.

The Taj Mahal's central mausoleum carries a bulbous outer dome within a carefully ordered garden and funerary complex. White marble, inscriptions, pietra dura, subsidiary sandstone buildings and the labour of craftspeople from across the Mughal realm define the monument as much as its silhouette. [38] [39]

Its dome should be identified through plan, inner and outer profile, supporting walls and material rather than treated as a generic `onion dome`. The building was commissioned as a tomb; its paradise imagery, cenotaphs and Qur'anic inscriptions belong to Mughal funerary and Islamic contexts. [39]

Other South Asian domical ceilings can be corbelled through successively projecting rings. Their carved concentric appearance may resemble a continuous dome from below, yet their joint geometry differs. The correct label follows construction evidence, not the visual habit of calling every rounded ceiling a shell.

Florence Cathedral and the double shell

Florence Cathedral's dome was built from 1420 to 1436 in an octagonal opening planned long before construction began. The official cathedral resource describes inner and outer shells joined through ribs, a cavity containing stairs, herringbone brickwork and a later lantern. [35]

A vast red-tiled octagonal dome with white ribs rises behind the marble cathedral façade beside the richly patterned bell tower.
Florence Cathedral's terracotta-clad dome and white stone ribs, photographed by Mariordo in April 2024 between the cathedral façade and Giotto's Campanile. Mariordo, Brunelleschi’s dome and Giotto’s bell tower, Florence; CC BY-SA 4.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

Filippo Brunelleschi's role is central, but the project also depended on earlier decisions, the Opera del Duomo, guild government, workshops, machines and a large labour force. [35] [36] `Brunelleschi built the dome alone` is as misleading as describing its visible white ribs as the whole structure.

The interior and exterior tell different stories. The steep tiled outer shell creates the city's landmark profile, while the inner shell carries a vast painted Last Judgment from a later campaign. [35] Material, structure, access route and imagery occupy distinct layers.

From iron roofs to geodesic lattices

Nineteenth-century metal framing allowed domed interiors and glazed enclosures whose visible finish could conceal an iron skeleton. The British Museum Reading Room used cast iron, concrete and glass to create an interior recalling the Pantheon while relying on modern fabrication. [47]

Twentieth-century geodesic domes changed the structural category again. The Fuller Dome Home is a documented three-frequency lattice of triangular panels, while the Climatron used aluminium and rigid glazing to enclose a controlled greenhouse environment. [45] [46] [47] Here the `shell` is a network of members, panels and joints rather than bonded masonry.

Geodesic should not mean `the final and strongest dome`. Member slenderness, joints, bracing, cladding, wind, snow, corrosion and foundations still govern performance. The Chicago Architecture Center's short taxonomy is useful for first orientation, but simplified civilisational and strength claims require the more exact evidence above. [48]

Light, sound, worship and civic use

Domes concentrate attention upward, but use changes their meaning. An oculus can project moving daylight, a ring of windows can make a dome appear visually detached, and a lantern can create a bright crown. [23] [24] [49] These effects are experienced differently in a rotunda, church, mosque, mausoleum, bath, library or greenhouse.

A pale ribbed dome rises above curved triangular pendentives, painted roundels, grey stone arches and a square Renaissance chapel interior.
Brunelleschi's Old Sacristy at San Lorenzo in Florence, photographed by Sailko in July 2016, with its dome, pendentives, roundels and chapel fittings retained. Sailko, Old Sacristy, San Lorenzo, Florence; CC BY 3.0. JPEG prepared; no crop or retouch.

Acoustics are equally specific. Curved surfaces can focus, scatter or prolong sound depending on profile, scale, finishes, openings and furnishings. A dome is not automatically an acoustic amplifier. Measurements and the occupied room matter more than a rule based on shape.

Sacred meanings cannot be universalised. Christian mosaics, Islamic inscriptions, royal emblems, funerary programmes and abstract tile belong to particular communities and phases. [24] [30] [33] [38] Continuing worship affects visitor routes, lighting, maintenance, interpretation and respectful access.

Watch: Domes in Roman and Byzantine Systems

Compare the Pantheon’s concrete rotunda and oculus with Hagia Sophia’s dome, pendentives, semidomes and light, keeping form connected to material, support, history and use.

Read fabric before condition

Begin with geometry, then identify material. Record unit size, joint direction, mortar, ribs, coatings, metal and the relation between inner and outer surfaces. Look for changes in tooling, colour, bond and alignment that may indicate replacement or repair. [2] [6] [7]

Map cracks by path, width, displacement and date. Note whether they follow joints, openings, ribs or transitions. Record water entry, staining, salts, detached plaster, corroding metal and blocked drainage without assuming one cause. Mortar repair must follow analysis and compatibility rather than a visually neat but harder replacement. [4] [5] [6] [12] [13]

Tumacácori's burnt-adobe sanctuary dome demonstrates why intervention history matters. Repeated coatings trapped moisture, later investigations exposed cracks and historic access features, and conservation returned to compatible lime-based work. [43] [44] That case does not prescribe treatment elsewhere; it shows why material, water and earlier repairs must be read together.

Compare observations with dated drawings, photographs and monitoring. Point clouds provide valuable surface geometry but do not reveal every void, bond or concealed tie. [18] [20] Structural and conservation decisions belong to qualified teams using measured evidence.

Domes: Five Evidence Tests

Classify plan, profile, shell, transition, material and phase separately before interpreting the whole.

EvidenceWhat it can establishWhat else to verify
Plan and profileCircular, polygonal or irregular plans combine with hemispherical, segmental, pointed or bulbous sections.An exterior silhouette may conceal a different inner shell.
ShellSingle, double, ribbed, coffered and lattice organisations describe different evidence.Inspect cavities, ribs, rings, ties and later reinforcement.
TransitionDrums, pendentives, squinches, arches and walls connect the dome to its support bay.Trace those elements onward to piers, walls and foundations.
MaterialConcrete, brick, stone, timber and metal require different units, joints and sequences.Surface finish does not reveal concealed structure.
ConditionCracks, water, detached finish and inserted ties document change.Map and monitor before qualified structural or conservation assessment.

A field checklist

  1. Draw the plan beneath the dome and mark its support polygon or circle.
  2. Sketch inner and outer profiles separately.
  3. Locate crown, oculus, lantern, shell base and drum.
  4. Identify direct support, arches, pendentives, squinches, piers, walls and foundations.
  5. Classify profile, construction and material on separate lines.
  6. Record ribs, coffers, ties, chains and reinforcement without guessing their role.
  7. Distinguish structural shell from plaster, tile, mosaic, paint and roofing.
  8. Map cracks, displacement, moisture, salts, metal staining and detached finishes.
  9. Separate original, altered, restored and reconstructed phases.
  10. State what is unknown and seek authorised inspection before diagnosis. [2] [8] [11]

High-level access, maintenance routes and visitor adjustments should protect both people and significant fabric. Accessibility can often be improved through carefully planned, reversible work, but each sacred or historic place requires consultation with its community and custodian. [9] [10]

Frequently Asked Questions

A dome is a double-curved roof or vault covering a space. It is often a surface of revolution, but it need not be hemispherical or circular in plan. [1] [15]

Useful types describe different things: hemispherical, segmental, pointed and bulbous describe profile; ribbed, coffered, double-shell and geodesic describe organisation or construction. A complete description can use more than one type.

It depends on geometry, material and support. Masonry domes use three-dimensional compression and circumferential action constrained by walls, piers, rings, ties or adjoining vaults; framed domes rely on members and joints. Survey and analysis are required for a real building. [14] [17] [21]

Usage varies, but `dome` is the broad roof or vault form, while `cupola` often means a smaller domed or roofed structure, sometimes a lantern above another roof. [1] [15]

Read plan and section. Trace the shell to a drum, circular wall, arches, pendentives or squinches, then follow those elements to piers, walls and foundations. Record materials, joints, cracks and later reinforcement, and do not infer safety from silhouette. [2] [18]

Discussion

Which dome most clearly shows why silhouette, section, support, material and use must be read together?

Reader Insights

Geometry

What are the plan, inner profile, outer profile and shell organisation?

Support

How do drums, arches, pendentives, squinches, walls and piers connect?

History

What do material, phase, sacred or civic use and repair records add?

Join the Conversation

Share a documented dome below, noting its plan, section, material, transition, date, condition and evidence limits.

References

  1. Getty Research Institute. “Art & Architecture Thesaurus.” View source
  2. Historic England. “Understanding Historic Buildings: A Guide to Good Recording Practice.” View source
  3. Columbia University. “Art Humanities Architectural glossary.” View source
  4. National Park Service. “Common Problems with Brick Masonry.” View source
  5. National Park Service. “Preservation Brief 2: Repointing Mortar Joints.” View source
  6. National Park Service. “Glossary of Historic Masonry Deterioration Problems and Preservation Treatments.” View source
  7. National Park Service. “Preservation Brief 35: Understanding Old Buildings.” View source
  8. Parks Canada. “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places.” View source
  9. Historic England. “Easy Access to Historic Buildings.” View source
  10. National Park Service. “Preservation Brief 32: Making Historic Properties Accessible.” View source
  11. Historic England. “Conservation Principles.” View source
  12. Historic England. “Practical Building Conservation: Stone.” View source
  13. Historic England. “Practical Building Conservation: Earth, Brick and Terracotta.” View source
  14. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Thrust Network Analysis.” View source
  15. Cambridge University Press. “Domes, in The Stone Skeleton.” View source
  16. National Park Service. “Best Practices in Stone Building Preservation Management.” View source
  17. Buildings. “Masonry Dome Behavior under Gravity Loads Based on Support Condition.” View source
  18. Applied Sciences. “Seismic Assessment of Historical Masonry Buildings at Different Scale Levels.” View source
  19. Materials. “A Brief Overview on Crack Patterns, Repair and Strengthening of Historical Masonry Structures.” View source
  20. Applied Sciences. “Structural Health Monitoring and Management of Cultural Heritage Structures.” View source
  21. Applied Sciences. “Semianalytical Lower-Bound Limit Analysis of Domes and Vaults.” View source
  22. Getty Conservation Institute. “Conservation and Seismic Strengthening of Byzantine Churches in Macedonia.” View source
  23. Smarthistory. “The Pantheon, Rome.” View source
  24. Smarthistory. “Hagia Sophia, Istanbul.” View source
  25. Smarthistory. “Innovative architecture in the age of Justinian.” View source
  26. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Historic Areas of Istanbul.” View source
  27. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Hagia Sophia conservation mission record.” View source
  28. Smarthistory. “The Great Mosque of Isfahan.” View source
  29. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Masjed-e Jāmé of Isfahan.” View source
  30. Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Islamic Art in the Metropolitan Museum: historical context.” View source
  31. Smarthistory. “Mimar Sinan, Süleymaniye Mosque, Istanbul.” View source
  32. Metropolitan Museum of Art. “The Art of the Ottomans before 1600.” View source
  33. Metropolitan Museum of Art. “The Dome of the Rock.” View source
  34. Smarthistory. “Muqarnas, an introduction.” View source
  35. Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore. “Brunelleschi Dome.” View source
  36. Smarthistory. “Filippo Brunelleschi, Dome of the Cathedral of Florence.” View source
  37. Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore. “Florentine craftsmen, dome with herringbone bricks.” View source
  38. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Taj Mahal.” View source
  39. Smarthistory. “The Taj Mahal.” View source
  40. Smarthistory. “The Qutb complex and early Sultanate architecture.” View source
  41. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Persian Mosque.” View source
  42. Getty Conservation Institute. “Conservation and Seismic Strengthening of Byzantine Churches in Macedonia — PDF.” View source
  43. National Park Service. “Preservation History of San José de Tumacácori Mission Church, Part II.” View source
  44. National Park Service. “Earthen Architecture — Preservation Techniques.” View source
  45. Library of Congress, Historic American Buildings Survey. “Richard Buckminster Fuller and Anne Hewlett Fuller Dome Home.” View source
  46. Library of Congress, Historic American Buildings Survey. “Climatron, Missouri Botanical Garden.” View source
  47. National Park Service. “St. Louis Mid-Century Modern Architecture: The Matter of Materials.” View source
  48. Chicago Architecture Center. “Dome.” View source
  49. Smarthistory. “Brunelleschi, Old Sacristy, San Lorenzo.” View source
  50. Smarthistory. “Mimar Sinan, Rüstem Pasha Mosque.” View source
  51. Smarthistory. “The Safavids, an introduction.” View source
  52. Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Persian Tiles.” View source